INCIDENT: DEATH OF SIPHO BHILA

ADV PRIOR: ... the 9th of November 1998, the start of two weeks of amnesty hearings. Mr Chairman, you will notice from the bundles that have been prepared, that there are three incidents, I beg your pardon, four incidents involving the deaths of several deceased. The event that is going to be heard this morning is the death of one, Bhila and that involves the amnesty applications of Bosch, Rosslee and McCarter, also that of Taylor who is deceased and Wasserman, I beg your pardon.

Mr Chairman, may I possibly ask that the parties representing the applicants and the other interested parties put their names on record, as well as the Committee, thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Before that, have you put yours on record?

ADV PRIOR: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Mr Chairman, on behalf of the Amnesty Committee, the Evidence Leader, Advocate Paddy Prior, thank you.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, may it please you and the Honourable Members of the Committee, Louis Visser ...(inaudible).

MR VISSER: May it please you, Mr Chairman, Honourable Members of the Committee, I'm Louis Visser, instructed by Wagener and Muller. In the Bhila incident, Mr Chairman, I appear for number 3, A S Rosslee and number 6, L Wasserman.

Mr Chairman, you might have noticed, if I may be permitted to mention it now, you know that there are other incidents as well and it appears that there are two bundle 1's before you. It may be convenient if there is going to be cross-references, to refer to this as the Bhila bundle 1 and the other as Zandile bundle 1. If that would find pleasure with you, Mr Chairman.

And then lastly, may I be so bold as to ask, Mr Chairman, whether we might be allowed to discard such items of clothing as might be incompatible with the weather as we go along, Mr Chairman?

CHAIRPERSON: Certainly.

MR VISSER: Thank you.

MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman, my surname is Roussouw from the firm Ruth and Wessels. I'm appearing in the Bhila matter on behalf of applicant Bosch.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: May it please the Committee, Mr Chairman, Honourable Members, the name is van Schalkwyk of the Maritzburg Bar. In the Bhila matter I appear on behalf of the applicant, F McCarter as well as parties mentioned namely, Mhieza and Mgade.

MR NEL: Thank you, Mr Chairman, my name is Christo Nel, I have instructed Advocate van Schalkwyk, appearing for McCarter, Mhieza and Mgade. I'm also on record for the late Colonel Taylor and have been instructed so by his wife.

MR HUGO: Thank you, Mr Chairman, my name is Schalk Hugo, I appear on behalf of implicated parties, Mr M A Letsatsi, Mr V C Khumalo, Mr W B Maluleka and Mr P J Radebe, thank you, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Thank you, Mr Chairman and the Honourable Members of the Committee, my name is E Ngubane. I represent all the victims here, that is, Ntjale, Nxiweni, Vilagazi, Ndlovu, Ndwandwe and Bhila.

CHAIRPERSON: The Committee consists of myself, Andrew Wilson, Advocate Sigodi and Mr Malan.

ADV PRIOR: Mr Chairman, may I indicate at this stage that all the necessary and relevant Section 19 notices were sent out to implicated persons as well as to victims, hence the representation that we see today, thank you, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Who is going to begin?

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr Chairman, I believe I'm going to begin. I call the applicant, Mr Frank McCarter.

FRANK McCARTER: (sworn states)

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Thank you, Mr Chairman, may I proceed. May the applicant be seated? Thank you.

Mr McCarter, right in the beginning you have applied in terms of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, for amnesty in two occasions and have also completed the necessary application forms in this respect, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Your application form insofar as it relates to the Bhila matter, is contained in the bundle before the Honourable Committee, from pages 32 Mr Chairman and onwards, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Right at the outset, do you confirm the contents - if the Committee will bear with me for a moment, and you confirm the contents thereof, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: I confirm them, Mr Chairman.

EXAMINATION BY MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr McCarter, right at the outset then, would you please give the Committee a very brief background of your history and your work history, for want of a better description, with the South African Police Services.

Mr Chairman, we will be referring to page 6 of the application, that is on page 37 of the bundle before the Committee.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I joined the South African Police in 1976, initially stationed in Pretoria.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: At what unit were you stationed there?

MR McCARTER: In the Uniform Branch.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Would you sketch to the Committee the circumstance or perhaps I should say, what sort of unit was it that you had joined and what were the members like that were there?

MR McCARTER: It was charge office work and generally guarding cells and that sort of thing. I just might say that I'd come from an English-speaking background and I was thrown in in the deep end in Pretoria.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: You mentioned in paragraph B on 37 of the papers, that you were made aware of the communist threat and the ANC being regarded the enemy, would you care to elaborate on that?

MR McCARTER: Well 1976 was the time of the Soweto riots and that prior to that I'd not really taken much notice of any political activities or anything. It was only during '76 that I became more aware of the liberation struggle and that.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Was there any particular incident that stood out, that had an effect on you?

MR McCARTER: Well up until this point I was basically pretty much out of the political thing but at the end of 1976 was the so-called "Border Gate" incident where Constable Raap Britz and Sergeant Xhosa were wounded in a handgrenade attack. I happen to know these people personally, having gone through the border posts during school holidays and this had quite a profound effect on me.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Right. Would you proceed, where did you go to from there?

MR McCARTER: From there I went to Piet Retief where I was also station in the Uniform Branch. Thereafter I moved to Komatiepoort, and towards the end of 1977 I was transferred to the Security Branch.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: How do you find the Security Branch at that particular point in time, the circumstances there?

MR McCARTER: Well I found it was a step up from the Uniform Branch in that regard. I think the people were slightly better trained and it was more exciting I would say.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: You mention in the application that the branch was far more politically conscious than the Uniform Branch, would you elaborate on that?

MR McCARTER: Well we had to do with anything in combatting terrorism and that included the ANC/PAC and the various black ...(inaudible)

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr McCarter, before the short adjournment you were dealing with your joining the Security Branch, on page 37. Page 37, Mr Chairman and Honourable Members. You were explaining your statement in your application, that the Security Branch was far more politically conscious and I asked you elaborate when we ran out of power, would you please proceed with that?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, we attended various courses, lectures and had quite a bit of propaganda thrown at, anti-ANC/PAC and that sort of thing, propaganda thrown at us on these courses. The belief was firmly installed in us that the communist threat was real and serious.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: From Komatiepoort, where did you go?

MR McCARTER: In 1980 I joined Koevoet in Namibia.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: How long did you remain with Koevoet?

MR McCARTER: I was there for four years, Mr Chairman, where I had probably in excess of 80 contacts.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: What effect did that have on your beliefs?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, it only fortified my beliefs that SWAPO was communist inspired and it would be a disaster if South Africa also came under an ANC/SACP government.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: From Koevoet, after your return, where did you join or where did you go to?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I joined the Intelligence Section at headquarters in Pretoria.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: In essence what was your post at the Intelligence Section all about?

MR McCARTER: Well it was source recruitment and agent handling. During this period we also had to do a lot with ANC documents, SACP documents, which constantly propagated the overthrow of the South African Government at the time.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Did that have any specific effect on you?

MR McCARTER: Yes, it also just merely confirmed my beliefs at the time. I think after the 1985 Kabwe Conference of the ANC, the ANC became a lot more militant in its stance and the Setchaba and the various booklets reflected this stance.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Now in your application you mentioned that you were then transferred to Vlakplaas, would you just confirm that date that you went there.

MR McCARTER: 1986, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: To that extent, Mr Chairman, the application is incorrect when it says '88, I beg leave to amend that, '86.

How long did you remain at Vlakplaas?

MR McCARTER: For two years, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: And did you leave Vlakplaas towards the end of 1987?

MR McCARTER: Yes.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Where did you go to then?

MR McCARTER: To the Section C2 which was Terrorism Research and Identification.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: And finally, were you transferred to Pietermaritzburg in 1991?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: And are you still a member of the force?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: When did you leave?

MR McCARTER: At the end of last month.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr McCarter, we will now deal with the incident for which you have applied for amnesty and which is discussed here, that of Sipho Bhila. Did you set the incident on pages 33 and 34 of your application?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Would you proceed and basically read into the record what happened. We will interrupt you at stages to highlight certain aspects.

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: For the record, is that the case of the STATE vs DUDZILE CHARITY BABY BUTHELEZI AND 11 OTHERS I think, under Case No CC70/86?

MR McCARTER: That's as far as I recollect, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Alright, please proceed.

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Did you know him personally or did you have anything to do with him, any part of the investigation at any stage?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: When you refer to Major Andy Taylor, is this the late, well later Colonel Andy Taylor?

MR McCARTER: That is correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Yes, please proceed.

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: If you say "eliminate", what do you mean by that?

MR McCARTER: To kill him.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Yes, please proceed.

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: If I might just interrupt you there, who were these people? Steve Bosch, let's deal with him.

MR McCARTER: Steve Bosch and Adrian Rosslee were both Vlakplaas members who worked under my command on that particular trip.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: And Wasserman and Lembede?

MR McCARTER: They were both members of the Durban Security Branch.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Were there any other members present at that time?

MR McCARTER: Not that I recall of, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Right. You were talking about a vehicle, who drove the vehicle?

MR McCARTER: I'm not too sure, it wasn't me.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Please proceed.

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Now if I may interrupt you there, Mr McCarter, would you be able to identify that spot at all?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, it was dark and I didn't know the area at all.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Please proceed.

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: How many times did you shoot him?

MR McCARTER: Once, Mr Chairman, and Mr Rosslee also fired a shot into his head.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Yes, and then?

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: After that did you return to Durban?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Would in you summary say why was it that he was killed?

MR McCARTER: We were of the belief that it was in the interests of the safety of the State that he be killed and that had he carried on living he would have carried on with terrorist activities.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Now Mr McCarter, you have specifically on page 36 - Mr Chairman, 36, paragraph 10(a) of your amnesty application dealt with political objects sought to be achieved by this particular act that you have just related to, would you confirm that these are the political objects that you sought to achieve, as you set out in the ...?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Would you briefly sketch what these were.

MR McCARTER: Well the conflict between the liberation movement and the, liberation movements and the South African Government, and I felt that it was a situation of war and that we were perfectly justified in fighting this war.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Just for the record, you have referred in your amnesty application to certain submissions made by General J V van der Merwe, ex-Commissioner of Police to the Truth and Reconciliation Committee and you've also annexed that to you amnesty application.

MR McCARTER: That is correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Do you confirm that you agree with those submission?

MR McCARTER: I do, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Now if one can summarise the political object of this act that you've committed, how would you summarise it?

MR McCARTER: Well it was basically to prevent the ANC/SACP/COSATU alliance or SACTO alliance from violently overthrowing the government of the day and installing a communist government.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr McCarter, in paragraph 11(a) of your application - Mr Chairman, that would be found on page 39 of the application papers, you were asked: Were these acts or acts committed in the execution of an order on behalf of etc., would you just state your beliefs in this regard to the Committee?

MR McCARTER: I believed that these acts and omissions were carried out on instructions of the then South African Government and the South African Police. In this particular instance I received a direct instruction from Colonel Andy Taylor.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: You've also dealt in paragraph 11(a) with the Cosatu House incident which is not relevant here, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr McCarter, did you at any stage receive any benefit in any way financially or otherwise as a result of this act?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: You've said on page 7 of the application papers themselves - Mr Chairman, we'd be referring here to page 38 in the second to last paragraph, you've set out your views is you are to look back with the wisdom of hindsight, would you just repeat those for the Committee?

MR McCARTER:

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Is there anything else that you would like to add?

MR McCARTER: No, thank you, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: In essence therefore you confirm the contents of your application and in particular these aspects we've highlighted today?

MR McCARTER: I do, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: If I may just a moment, Mr Chairman. Thank you, Mr Chairman, that is the evidence in chief.

CHAIRPERSON: Who's the first questioner?

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: I'm prepared to go, Mr Chairman, if you will allow me.

Mr McCarter, this incident took place as I understand it, on the 22nd February 1987.

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: It's a long time again and if you have as bad a memory as I have I would imagine that it is difficult to recall all the detail today as you give evidence before this Committee, am I correct?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman. The only reason why I remembered the date was I had diarised it.

MR VISSER: Yes. Starting with the date, it is Mr Rosslee's recollection that as you said you were here on routine duties in Durban and that that was a stint which lasted from the 10th of February to the 27th of February, would that accord with your recollection?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: And the reason why I spoke about how well you remember the finer detail is, I want to put to you immediately that both Mr Rosslee and Mr Wasserman for whom I appear have grave difficulties in remembering certain finer detail. I therefore want to put to you some of the detail, perhaps you could shed light on those. Can we start with the question of you receiving the order from Colonel Andy, the late Colonel Taylor? Now would Rosslee be correct if he were to tell this Committee that his recollection is that this took place at CR Swart Square?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Now what he's hazy about is who were present at the time when Colonel Taylor gave you the order. He seems to recollect that he himself might have been present, would that accord with your recollection or would you say that his recollection is faulty?

MR McCARTER: I'm not too sure, I would assume that Mr Rosslee was there. The other people I can't recall.

MR VISSER: Yes, what he says is his recollection is it was the three of you, yourself, Colonel Taylor and himself. Not much turns on it but for the sake of a better understanding of the Committee, I'm just trying to clarify theses.

The next issue deals with what was discussed at the time. Clearly Mr Bhila was the subject which was discussed, that much is common cause. The question is, what might have prompted Colonel Taylor in giving the instruction that he should be killed? Now I have read in your application that you mentioned at page 33, in paragraph 1(iv), that's at the bottom of the page, that:

Now today you, and according to my instructions quite correctly stated that he wasn't charged in regard to that particular incident, he was in fact an accused in the Ramlakan case. The point arising here, Mr McCater, and I know this is a long introduction for a question but the point arising here is why you would have said Amanzimtoti in your application and why Mr Rosslee in his application at page, I'm sorry, not in his application but in a statement, a Section 204 Criminal Procedure Statement which we will hand in later, referred to the Mac Goo Bar bomb?

MR McCARTER: No, that's incorrect, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: That's incorrect yes, we know that now. The question is, just for the benefit of the Committee, can I put to you what appears to be the reason why you thought it was the Amanzimtoti bomb at the time and he might have thought it was something else, and that is with reference to the bundle with which we are working, the Bhila Bundle 1 at page 41. That is an affidavit in support of the application of the late Colonel Andy Taylor which he handed in to the TRC before his demise, and in paragraph 3.1 he in fact says that:

I'm informed and please tell me whether this accords with your perception of the matter, that Mr Bhila was in fact part of the same unit as was Mr Andrew Zondo who was the person who was not only accused but also convicted and sentenced in the Amanzimtoti bomb and that there was a very strong suspicion among the members of the Security Branch in Durban that Bhila was in fact also involved in that incident and that that might be the explanation as to why Mr, or rather Colonel Andy Taylor referred to the Amanzimtoti bomb and probably conveyed that to you on the day when he gave you the order at the CR Swart square. Now that is perhaps theoretical but insofar as an explanation can be given for a reference to the Amanzimtoti bomb, would you disagree with the one which I have suggested to you or would you be in agreement that on the probabilities that is what might have happened?

MR McCARTER: I'm in agreement with that, Mr Chairman. The fact - what I can recall was the Andrew Zondo trial, the Toti bomber as such, was separate to the other trial of Ramlakan Dudu Buthelezi and company but they were linked to some degree but the trials were separate and that's how I recall it and that is why I've written here, something to do with the connection with the Toti bomb.

MR VISSER: Yes, and ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: In his application he says that he was one of the accused in the Toti bomb, doesn't he Mr Visser?

MR VISSER: Yes, that appears to be incorrect, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: And that he was told, asked to kill him by somebody other than Mr Taylor.

MR VISSER: I'm sorry, what did you refer to now, Mr Chairman?

CHAIRPERSON: That Mr Wasserman asked him to do it.

MR VISSER: No, Mr Chairman. Which paragraph are you now referring to, Mr Chairman?

CHAIRPERSON: Page 24, paragraph 9(a)(iv), isn't that the incident?

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, the application of Rosslee is at page 24.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes.

MR VISSER: And he says:

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, and the next paragraph:

MR VISSER: Yes, but the confusion is, Mr Chairman, the fact that we know that Bhila wasn't an accused in that trial.

CHAIRPERSON: No, but the fact I'm asking you now, you've been putting it to him that it was Mr Taylor who told them at CR Swart Square.

MR VISSER: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: He is here saying isn't he, that Wasserman told them?

MR VISSER: Rosslee says that Wasserman said so, yes, but Taylor himself says that he told them. Well, it's implicit ...(intervention)

CHAIRPERSON: But Rosslee will say that the order was given by Taylor at CR Swart Square?

MR VISSER: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: That does not accord with his application.

MR VISSER: That may be so, but that will be his evidence, Mr Chairman. But thank you for pointing that out, yes. That is indeed so, Mr Chairman, that is his recollection but he will give evidence and this can be put to Rosslee at the time. I make no secret of the fact, Mr Chairman, that you will hear in this case, you will hear conflicting evidence about what finer detail did transpire and who were involved and who were present at various times.

Mr McCarter, if I then may continue, this routine duty which you referred in Durban, seems to indicate that you came down to Durban from Vlakplaas fairly regularly or is that an incorrect inference to draw?

MR McCARTER: No, that's correct, Mr Chairman, we came down on a regular basis.

MR VISSER: Why would that have been?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, at the time Durban was known in the Security Branch as "Bombay" and that wasn't because of all the Indians, it was because of the amount of bombs that had been going off in that period, and as a result of that myself and other members from Vlakplaas, which included the Askaris, the ex-ANC and PAC cadres, were in Durban to try and identify these possible bombers.

MR VISSER: Would it be correct or rather, would you think it's an overstatement to say that virtually all forms of the struggle of the past one could find occurring here in Durban during those years, 1987/1988? One had unrest, one had bombs, one had DLBs being lifted, there was labour unrest etc., isn't that true?

MR McCARTER: Durban was very active at that period.

MR VISSER: Very active. The shooting range which you referred to, was that an old South African Railway pistol shooting range?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: And I believe that on this range there was a brick building, a red brick building, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: And there may have been one or more car ports, would that be correct?

MR McCARTER: No, I can't recollect.

MR VISSER: You can't remember that. Now obviously the rest of the squad, if I may put it like that, must have been informed and instructed after your meeting with Colonel Taylor, would that be correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: For example Bosch?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Yes. Certainly Wasserman will tell the Committee that he was told about what was about to happen on the way to Winkelspruit when he stopped along the road having followed Colonel Andy Taylor in his motorcar, in Taylor's motorcar and Taylor there told him that Bhila was to be taken out. So his instruction came later, and I take it that of Mr Bosch came much later, according to his statement.

MR McCARTER: That's as far as I can recollect, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Yes, alright. Now Wasserman tells me that ...(intervention)

MR MALAN: Sorry, Mr Visser, can I just get that response or try to understand the answer of the applicant.

You said that's as far as you understood it, meaning that the instructions came at specific times or what are you confirming?

MR McCARTER: That the applicants, Wasserman and Bosch weren't present at the briefing by Colonel Andy Taylor.

MR MALAN: Now when did they receive their instructions or requests or whatever?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I can't recall exactly but it was on the particular day that Bhila had already been picked up.

MR MALAN: But that's really my question, why do you confirm something that you have no knowledge of?

MR McCARTER: That's how I understood but I can't recollect ...(intervention)

MR MALAN: Did you give them instructions?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Wasn't Bosch under your command?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Why didn't you tell him what he was supposed to be doing?

MR McCARTER: I must have told him later when we had actually been, when we were actually at the shooting range, Mr Chairman. I can't recollect the details but I won't argue with Mr Visser that Mr Bosch only received his instructions later.

MR MALAN: Well that's fine then, just keep your responses in that fashion, don't confirm something, simply say you can't deny it, please.

MR VISSER: Yes, as the Honourable Chairman pointed out, you would have been the one that would have filled Mr Bosch in, him being under your command and also from Vlakplaas, not so?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Must I repeat the question, Mr Chairman?

CHAIRPERSON: ...(inaudible)

MR VISSER: As the Chairman put to you, you would have been the one to inform Bosch, under normal circumstances, you being his senior officer and you both being from Vlakplaas?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Alright. Now at this shooting range, I'm going to ask you first of all to try to identify who all were at the shooting range and secondly I'm going to ask you whether you can remember in what order people who arrived there, who were there, had arrived. Now first of all, during the course of that day, who can you remember who were present at the pistol shooting range at Winkelspruit? Yourself was there ...

MR McCARTER: Myself, Steve Bosch, Adrian Rosslee, Lawrie Wasserman, Michael Lembede and Colonel Andy Taylor.

MR VISSER: Rosslee in his Section 204 affidavit indicated that he thought that a person by the name of Spyker was also present, can you recall today whether this person Spyker who was a member of the Security Branch Durban, whether he was present or can't you recall?

MR McCARTER: No, I can't recall, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Alright. Now Wasserman tells me - I'm sorry, Mr Chairman, Mr Chairman, Spyker's surname is Mhieza, I'm not quite sure how you spell it, or however one spells it.

CHAIRPERSON: ...(inaudible).

ADV PRIOR: ...(inaudible)

MR VISSER: Thank you, Mr Chairman, to my learned friend, Mr Prior.

Mr Wasserman informs me and he will give that evidence, that he himself and Colonel Taylor arrived at a time after you - well, they arrived at the pistol shooting range finding you and Bosch and Rosslee already there, would that be in accordance with your recollection?

MR McCARTER: I can't deny that, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Yes, alright. Now whether Spyker may or may not have been present at the shooting range, may I ask you - well, the answer is I suppose self evident but can you remember how many black members were present at the time when Mr Bhila was shot on the edge of the cliff?

MR McCARTER: Only Michael Lembede.

MR VISSER: Yes. That is the recollection of Mr Wasserman as well. Now just to deal with another incident, on the way there or on the way back there was a flat of the kombi, I think you referred to it, do you remember that?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Now as far as your recollection goes, was it on the way to the cliff where Mr Bhila was assassinated or was it after the time, that you had the flat?

MR McCARTER: It was on the way to the scene.

MR VISSER: Alright. Now in Mr Rosslee's application at page 25, he talks about having shot Mr Bhila plus minus seven times in the head - page 25, the second paragraph, Mr Chairman, the last sentence. Your evidence in your application form, as well as your evidence here today indicated that Rosslee fired once.

MR McCARTER: That's as far as I can recollect, yes, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Now I don't want to burden you with that part of the evidence of what Rosslee is going to testify to but I want to ask you is this, do you have any recollection on that evening whether something went wrong with the firearm that Mr Rosslee was using? Do you have any recollection of that at all?

MR McCARTER: I vaguely remember a stoppage with the firearm but not in detail, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: When you speak about a stopping, do you talk about a stoppage in the automatic mechanism of the pistol?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Alright. Now the firearms, can we just talk a little bit about the firearms. What type of firearms were they? Well first of all, was there only one firearm used by you and Rosslee or were there two used?

MR McCARTER: There were two firearms, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: What were they?

MR McCARTER: As far as I can recollect they were 6.35mm or .25s.

MR VISSER: Yes, Baby Browning?

MR McCARTER: Similar weapons.

MR VISSER: Similar, alright. And where did they come from, do you know?

MR McCARTER: From Vlakplaas, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Yes. Were they authorised issue in the sense of the normal regulations pertaining to the South African Police?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: So in effect both you and Mr Rosslee at the time when you used those firearms, were in illegal possession of those firearms?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: And would they be firearms that had been previously lifted or confiscated prior to this occasion or where would they have come from?

MR McCARTER: I'm not too sure, Mr Chairman, we received them at Vlakplaas sometime before then.

MR VISSER: Alright. Can you perhaps recall what happened to the firearm which Rosslee gave you after the event? Did you give it back to him or did you keep it with you?

MR McCARTER: I don't remember receiving a firearm but I can't deny it.

MR VISSER: You don't remember receiving the firearm, is that what you said?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Oh, I see, I'm sorry, perhaps I mustn't assume things.

Mr Rosslee said that he gave you one of two of these pistols which he had in his possession, you say that you can't remember? - to use on the occasion.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I'm not too sure. I recollect receiving the weapon when we were at Vlakplaas.

CHAIRPERSON: I see. So are you saying in effect that this was part of a pool of weapons which you were using?

MR McCARTER: More than likely, it's difficult to describe. We were given these weapons at Vlakplaas some, quite some time before this incident took place.

MR VISSER: Well Mr McCarter, I'm certainly not going to press you to attempt to remember.

At the time of the shooting you referred to a hood that was drawn over the head of Mr Bhila, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: My question to you is, was or was he not also handcuffed? And if you can't remember, please say so really.

MR McCARTER: I can't deny it or agree with it.

MR VISSER: Yes, alright. Because according to the recollection of Mr Rosslee, his hands were cuffed behind his back and he had a hood over his head at the time when he was shot.

Alright. Going on then, he is taken, that is Mr Bhila, is taken to the edge of the cliff, and you told the Committee that you shot him once in the head.

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Were you standing on his left side or his right side, in front of him or behind him and where in his head did you shoot him or can't you remember?

MR McCARTER: I shot him in the temple.

MR VISSER: In the temple, left or right?

MR McCARTER: On the right temple.

MR VISSER: So you were probably standing on his right?

MR McCARTER: On his right, yes.

MR VISSER: Was he standing upright or was he kneeling or ...?

MR McCARTER: He was seated on a rock, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Seated on a rock. That's incidentally as Mr Rosslee recalls it as well. Did he then fall down?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: And Mr Rosslee would have shot him when he was lying on the ground?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Why did - how did you come to put this bag over his head?

MR McCARTER: We didn't want for him to know where he was going. We put him under the impression that we were going to meet people.

CHAIRPERSON: But you were still helping him to get out of the country?

MR McCARTER: That was his impression.

CHAIRPERSON: That's what you had told him.

MR McCARTER: No, no, can I just clarify here, Mr Chairman. He was picked up by one of the Askaris on the pretext that he was leaving the country, however then we apprehended him or we intercepted the vehicle, then he was aware that he was now in our custody.

CHAIRPERSON: And that you were police?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Carry on.

MR VISSER: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

ADV SIGODI: May I just ask, where did you get this hood from that you put over Mr Bhila's head?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall that, Mr Chairman, I just know that there was a hood.

ADV SIGODI: And what kind of a hood was it?

MR McCARTER: Just a material sort of bag, almost like a prisoner's property bag that one keeps in the cells.

ADV SIGODI: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

And thereafter the body as you say, was disposed over the cliff?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: If I may Mr McCater, I want to take you back now to the pistol shooting range. You spent quite a considerable period of the day at the pistol shooting range with Mr Bhila, as I understand it?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: At least the whole of the afternoon?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Until it became dark?

MR McCARTER: That's correct.

MR VISSER: And then you left. Can you remember, and if you can't please say so, who gave directions as to where to drive?

MR McCARTER: This was Michael Lembede.

MR VISSER: Michael Lembede. He's the gentleman who was later killed, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Who was the Ernest that I heard you refer to in connection with making contact with Mr Bhila?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I don't like the word "Askari" but that's been used quite regularly so I'll use that word, he was one of the Askaris from Vlakplaas.

MR VISSER: And his job was simply to make contact with him, or is that as I understand your evidence, and nothing further?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, he was merely there to coerce Mr Bhila into our clutches.

MR VISSER: Were you already at the pistol shooting range when Mr Bhila arrived?

MR McCARTER: No, I was in the vehicle that intercepted Ernest and Mr Bhila.

MR VISSER: And did you thereafter go to the shooting range with Mr Bhila alone without Ernest?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Alright. What I want to ask you about your sojourn at the pistol shooting range is whether you can remember at all whether Mr Bhila was being interrogated at the time.

MR McCARTER: Not, that I can recall, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Yes. For the record, Mr Chairman, that accords with the evidence which Mr Wasserman will give but that would not accord with the evidence that Mr Rosslee will give. I will come to that.

Lastly Mr McCater, just in regard to your political objectives as you explained them to the Committee, you said something to the effect that you believed that the acts which you committed, the unlawful acts which you committed were in fact on the instructions of the South African Government. Well be that as it may, I don't want to quibble with you about that but did you in any event regard it that whatever you did was in fact and in effect in support of the South African Government?

MR McCARTER: Absolutely, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, I'm sorry that I was so long but I believe that is what I have for this witness, thank you.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman, Roussouw on record for applicant Bosch.

Mr McCarter, with reference to the shooting range, Mr Bosch will testify that the area in Durban was unknown to him and that this was either the first or the second, he's not sure, instance in which he was deployed here from Vlakplaas, would you confirm that?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman, Mr Bosch only came down to Durban on one or two occasions.

MR ROUSSOUW: In his application he mentions that the area where you waited, which we now know was the shooting range, he refers to it as a municipal park and that's clearly a mistake.

MR McCARTER: I understand that the place has now been converted into a municipal park.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr McCarter, when you arrived or rather, when you intercepted Bhila, who was with you in your vehicle?

MR McCARTER: As I recollect it was Rosslee, myself and Steve Bosch and Michael Lembede.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch states that he can't recall that and he's not sure whether Bhila was brought to the shooting range after he had already arrived there or whether he came there with you, he can't recall that. I'm just putting that to you to find out.

MR McCARTER: I won't deny that, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: What will you not deny?

MR McCARTER: That he is not sure of what transpired.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr McCarter, may I go back to the time when you received the instruction. Further to your evidence-in-cross by my learned friend, Mr Visser, Mr Bosch will testify that he was not present when the instruction was given by Mr Taylor, is that absolutely correct, do you confirm that?

MR McCARTER: I won't deny that, Mr Chairman.

MR ROUSSOUW: Coming to the time when he was informed of the purpose of the operation, Mr Bosch will testify that while you were waiting he was waiting with you at the shooting range, he was not informed at that time of what was to take place, can you confirm or deny that?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, it's a little bit inconceivable to me that I'd, that he wouldn't be informed at that time, by that time. I won't deny it but I can't think that I wouldn't have informed him or someone wouldn't have informed him.

MR ROUSSOUW: You've testified in cross-examination that you didn't give him the instruction, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, did I say I didn't give him, I can't recall that.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Chairman, I've got a note here ...(intervention)

CHAIRPERSON: Didn't the witness say in fact he was the person who would have probably have given the instruction?

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Chairman, my note was - in a question from Commissioner Malan, whether Mr McCarter gave instruction to Bosch and the applicant then said: "No, I must have told him while we were at the shooting range", that was his response.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, I didn't make notes but my recollection is that he made it quite clear that he would have been the one to give him, because I asked him, Rosslee and Bosch being the junior officers under his command he would have been the one to give instructions and he said yes.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr Chairman, if I may assist, my note was the question was: "You would have been the one to inform Bosch", by Mr Visser, and the answer was: "That's correct". That was the question and the answer.

MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

Mr McCarter however, the evidence from Mr Bosch will be that at the time while he was waiting with you at the shooting range, he had not yet been informed of what the purpose of keeping Mr Bhila there would be.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chair, I'm not in conflict with Mr Bosch but I find it rather inconceivable that I wouldn't have informed him at that period. I agree with him if he says that he wasn't there when Mr Bhila was initially picked up, but I find it a bit strange that I wouldn't have told him at some stage during the day.

MR ROUSSOUW: And Mr McCarter, his evidence will further be that after the ...[intervention]

MR MALAN: Sorry. Mr Roussouw, just to have clarity in my mind, what did you say Bosch will testify to, that at the shooting range when he arrived, he did not know the purpose of Bhila's detention there? Will he say when he learnt what the purpose was?

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Chairman, that is set out in his application and you will find it on page 16 of the bundle, where he says that after the body had been disposed of he was informed who Bhila, who the person was, he was never informed about the identity, he was just informed that this was an ANC terrorist and that he was involved in the bombing at the business complex at the Natal South Coast.

MR MALAN: Thank you.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr McCarter, can you confirm or deny that, that you informed Mr Bosch on the way back, after the body had been disposed of, what the purpose would be of the operation?

MR McCARTER: As I said, Mr Chairman, it's unlikely that I would have only informed him after the incident, but I'm afraid I can't confirm or deny.

MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman, I've got no further questions.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HUGO: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

Mr McCarter, just for your convenience, you might have heard that we're acting for Mr Letsatsi, Mr Khumalo, Mr Maluleka, Mr Radebe. Is it correct, or let me rather put it to you, that three of them were normal policemen and there was one Askari amongst them, Mr Khumalo, is that your recollection of what the state was at the time?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: Is it also your recollection that they were part of a bigger contingent of Vlakplaas policemen that travelled down to Durban and had spent there time here from the 10th of February to the 27th of February?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: And the contingent existed of a total amount of 11 policemen?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall the numbers but that would have appear about right.

MR HUGO: Mr McCarter, I think you've testified to that effect, just for clarity's sake, the first meeting that you had with Mr Taylor on the 20th of February, is it correct that none of the black policemen attended this meeting?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman, as I recall it it was just Rosslee and myself.

MR HUGO: You then subsequently gave an instruction to Mr Ramatala, to Ernest, to approach Mr Bhila, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: Now what made you decide to instruct Mr Ramatale specifically to approach Mr Bhila?

MR McCARTER: Mr Ramatale had intimate knowledge of the workings of the ANC and the MK and it would have looked a bit silly had I tried to approach Mr Bhila, proclaiming to be an MK member.

MR HUGO: To the best of your recollection, where was Mr Bhila living or staying at that time?

MR McCARTER: In Lamontville.

MR MALAN: May I just follow up? The question put by Mr Hugo was, why did you instruct Mr Ramatale specifically, and he referred to other black members also being present and you only said it would look silly if you would have approached him, but why Ramatale and not one of the others? I think that was the question.

MR McCARTER: I did say, Mr Chairman, that Mr Ramatale was intimate with the workings of the ANC and the MK.

MR MALAN: Were the other black members not?

MR McCARTER: There were at least three of them that were policemen who didn't have that background.

MR MALAN: Thank you.

MR HUGO: Now if Mr Ramatale was to approach Mr Bhila in Lamontville, who gave him the specifics as to where he was living, the specific address?

MR McCARTER: That would have come from Colonel Andy Taylor, he gave us the specifics.

MR MALAN: Mr McCarter, the question was, who gave Mr Ramatala the address?

MR McCARTER: That would have been me, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Thank you.

MR HUGO: When the instruction was given to Mr Ramatala by yourself, was anybody else present, any of the other black policemen?

MR McCARTER: To be honest, I can't recall.

MR HUGO: And if we just go back to the details and the specifics pertaining to the address, where did you get those specifics from?

MR McCARTER: That would have been from Colonel Andy Taylor.

MR MALAN: Do you remember that, Mr McCarter? Are you giving evidence or are you building some likelihood, some probability?

MR McCARTER: It could have only been Colonel Andy Taylor, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: My question was whether you remember it?

MR McCARTER: Not specifically, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: Well Mr McCarter, maybe I should put it to you at this point in time, that Mr Maluleka, one of our clients will say that they liaised with a person who was at that time in custody, a certain Stanley Mony who later became a member of Vlakplaas and he was then recruited or instructed by Mr Lambede to assist them in their approach to Mr Bhila, do you have any recollection of that?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: Mr Maluleka's version is further that Mr Stanley Mony was booked out of jail, if I may use that term, specifically with the purpose of approaching Mr Bhila and to try and win over his confidence to get him to co-operate, on the pretext that he would be taken out of the country. Can you recall that?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall that, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: Can you however tell the Committee what reasons did you give to Mr Ramatala for the prospective kidnapping that would take place, why should it have been done?

MR McCARTER: Purely for detention purposes, not legal detention but detention purposes in order to interrogate him.

MR HUGO: Can you just tell us once more, when the vehicle with Mr Bhila arrived at Lamontville, how many occupants were in that vehicle at the time?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall, Mr Chairman, but there - I can't recall.

MR HUGO: Well let me just put it to you for completeness sake, Mr Maluleka will say that he was just initially involved in this operation to the extent that if any arrests were made and if there was to be any opposition from Mr Bhila, that he would then carry out the arrest and after everything had gone according to plan he then left and he never went to Lamontville. Can you recall as to whether he was at Lamontville or not?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall Mr Maluleka but the members that went there went there merely in support of Mr Ramatala and after the operation had taken place they then left.

MR HUGO: And I take it what you are saying is that Mr Ramatala left after the vehicle had been intercepted and you had taken custody of Mr Bhila.

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: Then Mr McCarter, Mr Maluleka will also say that during the initial operation a Honda vehicle was used and this vehicle, well the two occupants of this vehicle was the said Stanley Mony and Ramatala, do you have any recollection of that?

MR McCARTER: I can't remember the vehicle but it was a hired vehicle.

CHAIRPERSON: Before you go on, can I go back for a minute, I'm a little confused. As I understood you you said Maluleka said he was not involved, he was just there to carry out the arrest if that was necessary. When things went off smoothly he left and did not go to Lamontville.

MR HUGO: Well Mr Chairman, maybe I should just put it a little bit clearer. There was an initial meeting point at Kentucky Fried Chicken where he was picked up, Mr Bhila.

CHAIRPERSON: Oh, he wasn't picked up at his home in Lamontville?

MR HUGO: No.

Just to get back to the hiring of the vehicle, can you remember who hired this vehicle, was it Vlakplaas members or was it the Durban Security Police that hired this vehicle?

MR McCARTER: I don't recall, Mr Chairman.

MR HUGO: Then Mr McCarter, we have also been furnished with a copy or just a short summary of the evidence that Mr Ramatala will be giving and we have also been furnished with an affidavit - copies of the affidavit haven't been made yet but they will be available fairly soon, let me just put it to you that in the summary Mr Ramatala says that:

Can we just have your reaction to this?

MR McCARTER: I would definitely - I can't confirm or deny it but I would have given them a reason for why he was being picked up and who he was.

MR HUGO: Well the question is really aimed at the number of people who attended this order group. Let me put it to you that my clients will say that they never attended this order group and it was never conveyed to them what the reasons would be. Can you deny that or can you confirm that?

MR McCARTER: I can't deny that, I can only remember speaking to Ernest Ramatala.

MR HUGO: I have no further questions, thank you, Mr Chairman.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR NGUBANE: Mr McCarter, you say that the Border Gate incident changed your life, at least your political thinking, is it correct?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, it had a profound effect on me ...(inaudible).

MR NGUBANE: By that time when this Border Gate incident took place, could you kill any member of the ANC or PAC for political reasons?

MR McCARTER: In hind - no, I doubt it, I wasn't conditioned at that stage.

MR NGUBANE: And immediately after this incident, the Border Gate incident, could you kill any member of the ANC or PAC for political reasons?

MR MALAN: He's already answered ....(inaudible). Has he not just answered the question and did he not say: " doubt it, I wasn't at that stage conditioned"?

MR NGUBANE: I had said prior to the Border Gate incident, now I said immediately after the Border Gate incident.

MR MALAN: My apologies, Mr Ngubane.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: With respect, Mr Chairman, that was not how the question was framed, but be that as it may.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I think my conditioning took place over a long period and I doubt whether, I wasn't even thinking about killing people after the Border Gate incident.

MR NGUBANE: At what stage did - can you tell us at what stage did you reach a stage where you could kill for political reasons?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, could I just get some clarity on this "political reason"? Is that merely because a person's a member of an organisation or is it because a person's armed with a weapon and shooting at me, can I just get some clarity on that?

MR NGUBANE: Before I give you clarity to that, is it not your case that you committed the murder of Bhila because you pursued a political objective?

MR McCARTER: My political objective was in keeping the South African Government in power at the time.

MR NGUBANE: Now at what stage did you then decide to kill in order to achieve a political objective?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, this was the once and only time that I was involved with an unarmed man.

MR NGUBANE: Did you decide to kill for political reasons when Taylor gave you instructions to kill?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, my understanding is that my political objective was to uphold the South African Government, keep them in power, and that was my political objective in killing Mr Bhila.

MR NGUBANE: Yes, that's what I want to clarify. At what stage did you reach that point that you could kill in order to achieve a political objective?

MR McCARTER: I'm afraid I can't say at what stage I reached that.

MR NGUBANE: Now the Border Gate incident, that involved Raap Britz and Sergeant Xhosa, how would you describe the relationship between you and them, were they your friends or just your colleagues or your acquaintances?

MR McCARTER: I'd been passing through that border post for many years whilst schooling and they were well-known to me, I wouldn't say they were friends but they were well-known to me and I think it was the fact that they had been wounded and it was people that were well-known to me.

MR NGUBANE: And did you feel like avenging on their behalf?

MR McCARTER: No, no, it was just a shock to me that brought the ANC and liberation movements into perspective.

MR NGUBANE: Now when you say at page 37:

Are you only referring to shock?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman, that people were now prepared to kill policemen.

MR NGUBANE: But shock, doesn't it occur for a short while and then you are over it?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I would say that was, it was an eye opener to me but I wouldn't say that that was the catalyst in me killing Mr Bhila, by no manner of means.

MR NGUBANE: And didn't you feel that the people that had attacked your colleagues had to be dealt with in some form or another?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, no, at that stage I'd just joined the police, I was 19 years old. I didn't have an opinion as to how other than the lawful arrest and incarceration.

MR NGUBANE: Now coming to the order by Mr Taylor, I didn't get you quite clearly, what was the order given to you by Mr Taylor?

MR McCARTER: It was to kill Mr Bhila.

MR NGUBANE: For what reason?

MR McCARTER: The fact that he'd been part of terrorist cell, that he'd been acquitted on terrorism charges and that he was likely to go back and resume his activities.

MR NGUBANE: And you being an ordinary policeman not full of avenge, you just decided to join in that conspiracy to kill?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, this - a decision to kill someone isn't taken lightly but due to the propaganda over all the years and that sort of thing, one's enemies were dehumanised and it wasn't - one didn't look at them as people but as an enemy. That is now speaking about members of the liberation movement.

MR NGUBANE: Well according to you earlier evidence, that occurred when Taylor told you, you started regarding these people as - you started thinking that you could matter at the time when Taylor told you about that, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, up until that time I'd been involved in probably 80+ contacts with the enemy, I'd been wounded, and if they were prepared to shoot at me I was prepared to shoot back and I did kill people in the course of my duties.

MR NGUBANE: In the course of duties before the murder of Bhila, had you been involved in some other murders?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, no murders.

MR NGUBANE: Now when Taylor told you that you should go and ...(intervention)

MR MALAN: Excuse me, Mr Ngubane, I'm not sure that I understand this question. Did you not say this was the only murder that you were involved in, an unarmed man?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman, that's the only murder I was involved in.

MR MALAN: Your answer was "up until the Bhila incident you weren't involved in any murders", but that wasn't the question, the question was whether you had been involved in killings.

MR McCARTER: Can I just - can we look at the record there because I understood that he asked me when I was prepared to kill.

MR MALAN: That's exactly, prepared to kill was the question.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, it's a very ambiguous question that because kill in the line of duty or murder. There's two different things here, can I just get some clarity on it?

MR MALAN: No, Mr McCarter, based on your evidence you murdered Mr Bhila in the line of duty, that was your understanding at the time, that's what you told us, that is the basis of your application.

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman, but he was unarmed.

MR NGUBANE: Thank you.

Are you suggesting that all the killings before Bhila, the Bhila incident, were done on armed people?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: I think it's common cause that Vlakplaas is notorious for killing political activists who were unarmed, are you seriously suggesting that during your stay at Vlakplaas you never killed anyone unarmed?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Now this was the first incident when you were going to kill someone who was unarmed, Taylor had told you that you should kill this man, you were an innocent policeman at that time, did you ask for greater details from Mr Taylor why this man should be killed?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, I took his word for it.

MR NGUBANE: Just on scanty details, you being a policeman who had never killed an innocent man, decided to kill?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I had a vague background of the trial and the circumstances, so it wasn't as if I was running completely uninformed.

MR NGUBANE: Yes, if you say vague, how vague were they, just tell us the details of the trial which you got from, those vague details which you got from Mr Taylor.

MR McCARTER: I've mentioned it there, Mr Chairman, that Mr Bhila was an accused in the Ramlakan - or I always understood it as the Ramlakan but I think it involved, he was called Buthelezi and he was acquitted there.

MR NGUBANE: But the Ramlakan case is not similar to the Sanlam Centre in Amanzimtoti, isn't it?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, as I understood it, it was part of one cell. Mr Zondo was trial'd apart, separately from the others.

MR NGUBANE: Well my question is not, is that those are two different incidents, do you agree?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: So the Ramlakan incident and the Sanlam Centre bombing are one and the same thing, is that your evidence?

MR McCARTER: They're linked, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Just answer my question, don't evade. There's a difference between something that's linked to another and there's a difference between the one and the same thing, you know that. Is the Ramlakan incident and the Amanzimtoti bombing one and the same thing?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, as I said, they were part of one unit, that's Andrew Zondo and the Ramlakan group. However for expediency's sake I understand that that was why the trial of Andrew Zondo was separated from the others.

MR NGUBANE: Let's get it straight now. When Taylor told you, did he tell you that this man Bhila was involved in something that was linked to Amanzimtoti or he said that this man was involved in the bombing of Amanzimtoti?

MR McCARTER: He was involved in, linked up to the thing, he wasn't involved in the bombing, the actual bombing was done solely by Andrew Zondo.

MR NGUBANE: Now in your application, page 33, why didn't you come out clearly? The first line you say:

Why didn't you come out clearly as to the reason why this man had to be eliminated?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, this was my initial statement. I don't think every applicant has put in the fullest details in his statement.

MR NGUBANE: So you didn't come out clearly because it was just the initial statement?

CHAIRPERSON: But he goes on doesn't he, to say in the paragraph why he had to be killed:

...and they had every reason to believe he would continue with his activities.

MR NGUBANE: Yes, I do agree, Mr Chairman, I was just interested in this incident, this Amanzimtoti incident and Ramlakan but I won't pursue that line of questioning.

Now this Ernest Ramatala, your Askari, you say that he is the person who picked up Bhila from Lamontville, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's how I have it, yes, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: When did his role end?

MR McCARTER: When Mr Bhila was handed over to us.

MR NGUBANE: Was he alone when he went to fetch Bhila from Lamontville?

MR McCARTER: As I recall he was, yes, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: You cannot recall the car which he used to fetch Bhila, is that right?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Didn't Ramatala go as far as Amanzimtoti, sorry as far as the area which you referred to as the area that has been changed to a park?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: When the motor vehicle that carried Bhila moved to Umbumbulo, was there any interference with its numberplates?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall, Mr Chairman, but it would definitely have had false plates. I won't put that down for a fact.

MR NGUBANE: And I take it that you can recall who must have changed those plates.

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Did you at any stage tell Ramatala that the numberplates of the motor vehicle were changed before you could go and kill Bhila?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chair, we didn't use the same vehicle as Mr Ramatala had used, we were travelling in one of these minibuses.

MR NGUBANE: No, I'm not referring to Mr Ramatala's vehicle, I mean the vehicle that was used to convey Bhila to where he was killed. Did you at any stage tell Ramatala that the numberplates of that motor vehicle were removed?

MR McCARTER: No, I didn't tell him that but it was common practice for the Security Branch to change numberplates on a regular basis, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: When you left to kill Bhila, did you know where you were heading to, you personally?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: At what stage did you know that the area was Umbumbulo?

MR McCARTER: I heard it mentioned.

MR NGUBANE: When was that, was it before the killing or after the killing?

MR McCARTER: I don't recall, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: And I take it you don't recall who mentioned it?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, but it must have been Michael Lembede.

MR NGUBANE: Was it mentioned once or twice or several times?

MR McCARTER: I've travelled that road subsequently, Mr Chairman, so the name is familiar to me.

MR NGUBANE: Well you have travelled that road subsequently, when was that? That was during the time when you were employed in Maritzburg?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: And on the day of the killing you only travelled on that road at night, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Do you know the name of the road - sorry, did you know the name of the road at that time or doesn't it ...?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall that, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Now subsequently, how did you identify that that road was the road that you used to travel and kill Bhila?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, from the shooting range it's a short distance to the turn-off to that road, onto the main road.

MR NGUBANE: Would you say - well, subsequently did you visit the shooting range?

MR McCARTER: No, I didn't visit the shooting range but one drives past there on a daily basis, well not a daily basis but regularly and one sees the turn-off there.

MR NGUBANE: And as a result of your driving past that road, you say that you can clearly recall that you went to Umbumbulo, is that right?

MR McCARTER: I don't say I went to Umbumbulo, we went on the Umbumbulo Road, the Eston Road.

MR NGUBANE: So you don't know the spot where Bhila was killed?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: And after the killing, did you at any stage discuss about the killing of Bhila with anyone?

MR McCARTER: I don't recall that, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: And when you made your application for amnesty, did it not occur to you to communicate with any of the people that were involved, to give you the direction where you had killed Bhila?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, our paths have drifted apart over the years.

MR NGUBANE: In other words, you had not contact with any other person who was involved in the killing?

MR McCARTER: I see Mr Wasserman, I've seen him quite a few times but the others I have no contact with.

MR NGUBANE: You said when you gave your background, after the killing you continued to be the member of the, is it the Security Branch or what is the unit you belonged to?

MR McCARTER: Up until the end '87 I was a member of Vlakplaas and then I went to the, I was still a member of the Security Branch up until 1996 but I worked in different sections.

MR NGUBANE: And the black members that were with you at the time of the killing, when did you lose contract with them?

MR McCARTER: Michael Lembede was shot later that year, I think round about April or May of that year.

MR NGUBANE: And Ernest Mhieza?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, Mhieza was not involved in that specific incident but I do know a Mhieza.

MR NGUBANE: Sorry, it's not Ernest Mhieza, sorry I withdraw that. Vuzi Mhieza, do you know him?

MR McCARTER: That's the same Mhieza I'm talking about, he worked a the Durban Security Branch but he was not involved in the killing of Bhila.

MR NGUBANE: If the Chair can just bear with me.

Now your evidence, can you remind me again who were the members, the black members that were involved in the killing of Bhila, especially when you were waiting there for it to get dark, can you recall that?

MR McCARTER: The only person I can recall is Michael Lembede.

MR NGUBANE: Mhieza, you didn't see him on that day?

MR McCARTER: I don't recall seeing him on that day, no.

MR NGUBANE: Spyker, do you know the gentleman called Spyker? Is he one and the same person as Mhieza?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Now at page 15, application by Mr Bosch, that's paragraph 2 he says that:

Is that evidence correct?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman. The only black member I recall was Michael Lembede, it was myself, Rosslee, Steve Bosch and Wasserman.

MR NGUBANE: Well Sir, I ask you to avoid the word recall, I'm just interested in something we are certain about now. I want you to be very definite whether this evidence by Mr Bosch is correct or it's incorrect.

MR McCARTER: Where he refers to Aubrey Mgade and Spyker Mhieza he is incorrect.

MR NGUBANE: Thank you, Mr Chair, I have no further questions.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ADV PRIOR: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

Mr McCarter, is it correct as you have testified the white members from Vlakplaas together with certain black members were in Durban from the 10th of February 1986, 87?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Just to get the record straight, we've heard from Mr Hugo that his four clients or the clients that he represents were there, Letsatsi, Khumalo, Radebe and Maluleka. We know Ramatala was there, do you confirm that there were others, Mthembu?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chair, I can't recall. On different occasions we sometimes had different people.

ADV PRIOR: One, Tulo, M Tulo? Apparently he's now deceased.

MR McCARTER: I remember his name but I don't remember whether he was there.

ADV PRIOR: T S Nobela?

MR McCARTER: I remember Steven Nobela but I can't recall whether he was there.

ADV PRIOR: We've heard about Lembede, Mhieza you say wasn't there, and Aubrey Mgade, do you remember him being there?

MR McCARTER: No, Aubrey Mgade was a group, well a chap who worked with another group and he was definitely not there. I think it was Warrant Officer Letsatsi was the senior man.

ADV PRIOR: Look your memory may be failing you but we've produced the Travelling and Subsistence claims which show that those black members together with yourselves were in Durban over the same period, would you then ...(no microphone) those documents produced, would you then confirm - sorry, you keep shutting me down, would you agree then that those, the members that travelled with you to Durban and claimed for the same period in Durban as yourselves, would have been the members that made up your contingent?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr Chairman, sorry, I've had sight of these documents, the S&T documents, Mr Mgade's name does not appear on these documents, he wasn't part of this contingent, according to the documents.

ADV PRIOR: Thank you, I'm grateful for that.

And your evidence was that you were in Durban from the 10th of February up until the 27th, is that correct, after the death of Bhila?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chair, I can't remember the precise dates but that does sound right.

ADV PRIOR: And is your evidence that you were there for routine work or was there any specific work that you had to carry out?

MR McCARTER: No, it was routine work, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Can I understand from that or do I understand that no killings or murders had taken place from the 10th of February up until the time when Bhila was murdered?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: And it was purely by chance would you say, that you bumped into Colonel Taylor who said or indicated to you that he had a problem with Bhila and, or this person Bhila who had been acquitted and he then asked for your assistance?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chair, can I just clarify here that when we worked in a particular area, be it Durban, Cape Town or wherever, we fell under the command of that Security Branch and we then fell under Colonel Andy Taylor's command and control.

ADV PRIOR: Thank you, I understand. So you would obviously then take orders from him as a matter of routine?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Did you report back to him regarding your activities in that area?

MR McCARTER: Absolutely, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Let me go one step further, were you sent down to Durban to operate under Colonel Taylor?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, we received a request from the various branches for people to come and work in the area and then we'd then fall under ...

ADV PRIOR: Can you recall, I know it's a long time ago, what work you were engaged in up until Colonel Taylor indicated that Bhila had to be eliminated?

MR McCARTER: We were mainly monitoring railway stations, activists houses, that sort of thing, to try and see if there were any MK members that had infiltrated, monitored MK people's homes, sent the Askaris around to the MK people's homes to go and make enquiries as MK members, see if the chap had returned.

ADV PRIOR: And during this time it just so happened that Ramlakan Trial was proceeding, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's how I recall it, yes, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: We referred to it loosely as the Ramlakan Trial, I think he was accused Number 4, but it was Buthelezi and Nine Others. Sorry in the indictment it lists 10 accused but be that as it may. You indicated

that the firearm that you used to kill Bhila was something you drew from Vlakplaas, from the stores there or from the ...

MR McCARTER: Sorry, yes, they were given to us by Eugene de Kock on his knowledge.

ADV PRIOR: And these obviously were not standard issue, they were to used in clandestine operations, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Were they silenced?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: So correct me if I'm mistaken, the fact that you were issued these weapons before your journey to or your trip to Durban, would that necessary imply that somewhere along the line they were to be used?

CHAIRPERSON: I thought his evidence was he was given them some considerable time before, not in connection with this trip.

ADV PRIOR: Yes, yes.

MR McCARTER: Yes, that's correct, Mr Chairman, it was sometime before, it wasn't specifically for that purpose, no.

ADV PRIOR: But you took them to Durban specifically to have handy, for want of a better word, in case you required then during your tout of duty down there.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, it sounds very sinister but yes, we did have them in case one of the members had to pretend to be a trained fellow or had to, I don't know, you know there was various scenarios that one could have used it, not specifically for killing. That wasn't the initial ...

ADV PRIOR: Well a Baby Browning wouldn't be the sort of standard weaponry of trained MK, would it?

MR McCARTER: No, it wouldn't be.

ADV PRIOR: What I'm driving at is, and I want to suggest to you, is it not closer to the truth that when you went down to Durban on the 10th of February, armed with this light calibre weapon, you at least had some idea that you were going to be required to kill someone in Durban?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Did you know that Mr Rosslee also had a similar weapon to yourself?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Did you ever ask him why he was taking this weapon down to Durban?

MR McCARTER: Eugene de Kock had handed them out to various of us guys at Vlakplaas, so we knew that the guys were carrying them.

CHAIRPERSON: Had Bosch got one?

MR McCARTER: Not that I recall, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Well if you say de Kock issued you one as well as other members, did you ask him what for? Presumably you had your own standard issue?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, I did have my standard issue.

ADV PRIOR: Well did you ask for the necessity, why was it necessary to take this additional weapon down?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, his explanation as I recall it, was that one always reads these cop stories in America, should you accidentally shoot the wrong person or shoot someone that turns out to be unarmed, you slip a gun underneath him, and I think that was basically the idea of having the extra weapon.

ADV PRIOR: Now I'm curious as to, given your evidence and your background that you sketched for the Committee and on what you were told of Bhila, that he had - I'm not too clear on whether your information that he was acquitted in the Amanzimtoti bomb trial or in a related trial is not clear because your application seems to say one thing and your evidence today another, but we'll leave that. Were you under the impression that Zondo had been involved in bombings? Was that your information?

MR McCARTER: Are you saying Zondo or ...

ADV PRIOR: I beg your pardon, Bhila.

MR McCARTER: No, he wasn't directly implicated in any bombings.

ADV PRIOR: A perusal of the indictment against Bhila -Mr Chairman, copies are being prepared at this time, seem to indicate that what Bhila was involved in was a bombing at the Lamontville Township office on the 16th of June '85 and various aborted operations and also the establishment of a DLB. I think your counsel has the document. But in broad terms, did you know that?

MR McCARTER: No, not those specifics, Sir.

ADV PRIOR: Well if your information was not that Bhila had been involved in any bombings directly, did you still regard him on the information that you received, that he was a dangerous person and had to be eliminated in line with the policy of the Security Branch at that stage?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, he was a trained member, not trained outside the country but he had been trained inside the country, and as I had it he was almost like the quarter-master. He'd stored some of the weapons and I understand that he had stored some of the weapons or the bomb that was used in the Toti bombing.

ADV PRIOR: At the trial I understand that he was discharged after the closure of the State Case, on the basis that no evidence had been lead against him up until that stage, are you aware or that or were you aware of that?

MR McCARTER: I was informed that, yes.

ADV PRIOR: In your experience, what was the likelihood of a person like Bhila who had been arrested, he had been in detention for possibly a number of months, had sat through a trial of that nature, had been acquitted and obviously was known by the Security establishment, what were the chances that he would be able to operate with the Durban or Lamontville area?

MR McCARTER: Even greater, Mr Chairman, he now had a background, that he'd been arrested by the police, that he'd gone through the trial and that sort of thing. That would have given him greater standing within the liberation movement.

ADV PRIOR: It seems to my mind that the Security Branch was unhappy with the decision of the Court and that he was discharged, would you go along with that?

MR McCARTER: I think anyone, any policeman investigating a case whose accused is found not guilty, is generally unhappy.

ADV PRIOR: Even if there was no evidence against him you'd still feel aggrieved that he was discharged or acquitted?

MR McCARTER: Ja, I'd say it's pretty much so if you knew he was involved. Even thought the evidence was flimsy, if you knew he was involved you would be aggrieved.

ADV PRIOR: It would seem to my mind that if one did not accept the decision of the Court one is acting on a different level than a political motive, you're acting out of, you're becoming the executioner.

MR McCARTER: In hindsight that's quite correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: The Security Branch had the machinery at its disposal, which we see in the case of the other accused who were all convicted of ...(indistinct) of arresting, detaining, investigating the case and successfully prosecuting them given the veracity or otherwise of the evidence, the reliability of the evidence, would you agree?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: In any event this didn't really affect you did it, because you acted on the say-so of Colonel Taylor?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: At that stage, did you readily agree to kill Bhila or participate in his murder?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman, I didn't refuse.

ADV PRIOR: Mr Chairman, I see it's just gone 1 o'clock, may we take the adjournment at this time?

CHAIRPERSON: We'll adjourn.

FRANK McCARTER: (s.u.o.)

ADV PRIOR: Thank you, Mr Chairman. May I proceed with my questioning of Mr McCarter.

CHAIRPERSON: Proceed.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ADV PRIOR: (continued) Thank you.

Mr McCarter, the operation seems to have been divided into two parts, for a want of a better description, there was the plan to lure Bhila away from his home into the clutches of the Askaris and/or the members, the black members, and then a further plan was to have an interception of sorts where he would be taken away by yourself and the other members of Vlakplaas, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: And that was to leave in Bhila's mind that the people who had posed as ANC or UDF officials had also been intercepted, is that correct? He wasn't to know that he had been lured away by members of the force?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, he did know. Once we intercepted I think he realised that it was a set-up.

MR MALAN: Sorry, Mr Prior, I have grave difficulties with the responses of "I think he realised". Either commit yourself or do not. Did he know or did he not know?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, he must have realised once he had been taken into custody, that he was, that it was a set-up.

MR MALAN: Why must he have realised that?

MR McCARTER: The way car was pulled - well, it wasn't even pulled off, I think it was parked next to the road and we pulled up behind it and took him out of there.

MR MALAN: So it wasn't an interception, it was a handover, is that what you're saying?

MR McCARTER: Well it worked out to be a handover, it wasn't as if it was a roadblock or anything.

ADV PRIOR: The question was along the lines, and my understanding from Mr Ramatala was that even himself and the other black members were roughed up as it were, they were pushed around and given slaps and told to stand to one side while Bhila was then bundled into one of the kombis. In other words, the impression was created that this was an interception of an arrangement of the ANC, in other words that the police had simply come upon them or had information and that the cover of Ramatala and the others was intact.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, now that Advocate Prior has mentioned that, it does ring a bell, that ...

ADV PRIOR: Now from there, Bhila was taken to this pistol range that was eluded to ...(intervention)

MR MALAN: Sorry Mr Prior, may I just go back to the previous question. Did he then know or did he not know that the members who picked him up were police?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chair, Advocate Prior has reminded me of the situation, that it was exactly how he described. I can't say what Mr Bhila's frame of mind was then.

ADV PRIOR: Well did Bhila say anything when he was in your custody and under your control?

MR McCARTER: No, he never referred to those people again.

ADV PRIOR: What was his reaction once you had him under your control, and now were driving towards Winkelspruit?

MR McCARTER: Subdued.

ADV PRIOR: Now you spent some hours at this pistol, club as you have indicated almost until nightfall, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Now we have the application of Mr Rosslee as well as his Section 204 statement, which I think has been circulated, Mr Chairman, but in any even at page 74 of his amnesty application Mr Rosslee indicated, in fact at page 25, he said:

MR McCARTER: ...(inaudible).

ADV PRIOR: The question is, what is your allegation, that Bhila was interrogated?

MR McCARTER: That's incorrect, Mr Chairman, Bhila wasn't interrogated. As far as I could see it with speaking to Mr Wasserman and that they knew his whole pedigree. He had been interrogated, he'd just come out of incarceration and been set free so there wasn't really anything further to interrogate him about.

ADV PRIOR: Was he assaulted in any way, was he ill-treated, was he abused in any way?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, he was handcuffed and kept there, he wasn't abused at all.

ADV PRIOR: And at that stage everyone there knew that at some later time that day he was going to be killed, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: The people at the shooting range, that's correct.

ADV PRIOR: And that was the persons mentioned, that I mentioned a short while ago, Wasserman, Bosch - the two local black members I should imagine was Lembede and Mhieza?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, just Lembede.

ADV PRIOR: You say Mr Rosslee when he says there were two local black members, he refers to them earlier on - I beg your pardon it's he that mentions it, Mr Bosch mentions Spyker and Michael, that's Spyker Mhieza and Michael Lembede.

MR VISSER: If I might interrupt, my learned friend is correct, Mr Chairman, Rosslee also does and he does so in his 204's, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: I'm indebted to Mr Visser.

I'm trying to understand your, why you're so adamant, is it possible you could have forgotten or are you adamant that Mhieza was not present?

MR McCARTER: I'm adamant that Mhieza wasn't present. Mhieza and Lembede worked very closely together on the branch and we worked closely with them on the various times that we did come down to Durban but I'm adamant that Mhieza wasn't there on that particular day.

ADV PRIOR: Mr Bosch goes even further, he says that it was these two persons that actually threw Mr Bhila's body over the cliff.

MR McCARTER: No, that's incorrect, it was myself and Lembede who threw him over.

ADV PRIOR: Whose decision was it to execute him or kill him at this specific spot at Umbumbulo?

MR McCARTER: Well I think, I wouldn't like to say I think, because Lembede knew the area he was the one who showed us. We asked him where was a suitable place to dump and that's where he took us to.

ADV PRIOR: And when was that put, when was that asked, I mean when did you discuss with Lembede where it was suitable to kill Bhila?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall.

MR MALAN: If you say "we asked him", are you saying you asked him?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall whether it was myself specifically or someone else, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: How can you then recall that he was asked?

MR McCARTER: Well he took us to the place.

MR MALAN: Did he not make the decision then?

MR McCARTER: No, he was not in charge.

MR MALAN: So who asked then?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: But Mr McCarter, you were in charge, you were the senior man there were you not?

MR McCARTER: That's correct.

ADV PRIOR: And for all practical purposes the operation was under your control and your command.

MR McCARTER: That's correct.

ADV PRIOR: And in all probability you would be the one who would have asked Lembede who knew the area, "where we could have killed Bhila and dump his body", is that correct.

MR McCARTER: I concede that, I ...

ADV PRIOR: You concede that but you say you have no independent recollection of saying that?

MR McCARTER: No, Chairperson.

ADV PRIOR: The participation of the Askaris and the black members from Vlakplaas ceased as I understood your evidence, once Bhila had been handed over to yourself and the other members to be transported away from Lamontville, is that correct?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: ...(inaudible) exception on your version, of Lembede?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: It was suggested to you that one, Stanley Mony or Mani was in the vehicle driven by Ramatala, that is the Honda vehicle, when Bhila was fetched or met at the Kentucky.

MR McCARTER: ...(inaudible)

ADV PRIOR: I'm reiterating what was put to you by Mr Hugo.

MR McCARTER: No, I don't recall Mony at all. I ...(indistinct) the name Mony and I recall him but I don't recall that he was there, I only remember Ernest.

ADV PRIOR: At the break I was informed that Stan Mony was in fact a State witness who gave evidence during the trial of Buthelezi and Others, in which Bhila was an accused at that stage, are you aware of that?

MR McCARTER: I don't remember which trial but I remember that he was a State witness, ja.

ADV PRIOR: I recall in your amnesty application at page, I think it was at page 38 you indicated at some stage you worked under Craig Williamson in the Intelligence Section.

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Were you familiar with the organisation known as Trevits?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Did you have any personal participation in the work of Trevits?

MR McCARTER: No, there was just liaison, I never worked with Trevits itself, I worked at Trevits.

ADV PRIOR: Did you know whether Colonel Taylor, Andy Taylor was a person who frequented Trevits meetings?

MR McCARTER: I can't say, no I'm not sure at all.

ADV PRIOR: Can you say from your own knowledge whether Trevits was an organisation that actually targeted personnel, that's MK personnel from the ANC who were to be eliminated?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chair, Trevits was purely an administrative section at headquarters.

ADV PRIOR: Is that what your understand was, was that your understanding of the function of Trevits?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Mr Chairman, thank you, I have no further questions.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: No re-examination, thank you.

MR MALAN: Mr McCarter, in your application page 33 and top 34 you talk about going down on routine duties, can you just briefly try in a nutshell to explain to us what do you mean with "routine duties"?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, because we had the Askaris with us we were there in a, trying to identify trained personnel that had been trained in the camps with the Askaris and possibly do a false flag infiltration of organisations and generally keep surveillance on suspects houses, railways, bus terminuses, all that sort of thing, taxi ranks.

MR MALAN: Were you to oversee and check on the Askaris, is that what you are saying to us? Was that your function or then the white member's function?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: You were not supposed to be operational, other than assisting them?

MR McCARTER: We helped the branch wherever they had a particular need. If they had to go out on duties or something like that or go and raid houses or whatever, we went with then. We were there as a support.

MR MALAN: In paragraph 9(a)(iv) you say on the 20th you met Andy Taylor, did you know him from before?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: For how long?

MR McCARTER: I would say about two years prior to that.

MR MALAN: Then right at the bottom you say that he requested you to kill Bhila.

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: And you continue to say that you agreed you would do it.

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Nowhere in your evidence did you refer to a request, you constructed it as an order.

MR McCARTER: Well this request was an order but I just termed it like this because it wasn't as if I was standing to attention in front of his desk and being paraded, it came across basically as a request but we all knew it was an order.

MR MALAN: Why did Andy Taylor in his affidavit, page 42 of the bundle, 3.5, also refer to it as a request to yourself to have Bhila killed?

CHAIRPERSON: What page?

MR MALAN: Page 42 of the bundle.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I don't why he wrote it like that, perhaps he was putting it politely.

MR MALAN: Well Mr McCarter, can you tell me why nowhere in any of your affidavit or his there is any reference to an instruction or an order?

MR McCARTER: To me a request from a senior officer is an instruction or an order.

MR MALAN: You referred in your evidence-in-chief that you were involved in at least 80 contacts, where people were killed or violence used, is that so?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: And you also stated under oath that this was the only instance where you acted against an unarmed person.

MR McCARTER: Where I murdered or killed an unarmed person, yes, that's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: So in none of the other actions whilst you were at Koevoet or at Vlakplaas or wherever did you ever shoot an unarmed person?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Did you believe it to be the policy - rather let me put it the other way around, if you accepted it to be an order, at the time you apparently assumed it also to be a legitimate order that you had to follow?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I could possibly refused to carry it out, they couldn't have done anything to me but I would have been sidelined, but I definitely felt that it was justified at the time.

MR MALAN: Justified on what score?

MR McCARTER: At the time where we were in a war situation, drastic measures for drastic times.

MR MALAN: So then drastic measures for drastic times would have included that you would have killed any unarmed person at that time if told by a senior officer that it was important?

MR McCARTER: No, I think we can qualify that that if the person, there was sufficient grounds, I wasn't going to kill just anybody.

CHAIRPERSON: But this was a person who had just been found not guilty in the trial where eight of his colleagues had been convicted, didn't that indicate that he was not as active as Taylor was saying?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I don't recall the precise circumstances, I think Mr Wasserman would able to tell you more, why they were acquitted, on what grounds, but in my mind there was no doubt that he was involved.

MR MALAN: Now tell us why in your mind there was no doubt, on what basis?

MR McCARTER: Well the very fact that when Ernest Ramatala approached him and said that the ANC wanted him to go outside for further training, that he readily packed his bags and was ready to go, not packed his bags but was ready to go.

MR MALAN: Mr McCarter, were there not thousands if nor millions of youngsters that at that stage is approached would not have readily packed their bags?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I can't speak for those people but ...(intervention)

MR MALAN: On what basis can you then speak for Mr Bhila?

MR McCARTER: Well the fact of the matter is he did climb into the car, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: The fact that he was prepared to join the ANC in exile, did that constitute sufficient reason to kill him, in your mind?

MR McCARTER: Not that alone, Mr Chairman

CHAIRPERSON: How long had he been in custody?

MR McCARTER: I don't know, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: I take it some considerable time, in detention and awaiting trial.

MR McCARTER: I take it so, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: And then he's told the Security Police are coming for him again, can you really draw any assumption from the fact that he was trying to avoid further detention?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I don't know that he was told that the Security Branch were coming for him.

MR MALAN: Answer that same question on the basis of the police coming for him.

MR McCARTER: If he was told that I suppose he would leave but I don't know that he was told that.

MR MALAN: I want to try and explore please with your assistance, the frame of mind which constituted, in the minds of those of you who were involved, the concept of a legitimate action, reasonable, acceptable, defenceable action of killing an unarmed person. Were you ever close to or involved in a killing of other unarmed persons?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: And this the only incident ever that you were involved in, according to your evidence?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Did you not ask yourself questions?

MR McCARTER: I did ask myself questions.

MR MALAN: Did you know it was illegal?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Did you know it was not part of the policy?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: If you got the orders from Captain Taylor, did you not ask him where his authority was derived from?

MR McCARTER: No, I didn't question him but I knew it would have come from higher up.

MR MALAN: Why?

MR McCARTER: Because there was this situation that should we have been caught we basically knew that we would be looked after.

MR MALAN: By Captain Taylor?

MR McCARTER: No, by the government.

MR MALAN: Who in government?

MR McCARTER: I'm not sure but the government as a whole.

MR MALAN: Who told you that?

MR McCARTER: It was an accepted thing.

MR MALAN: I'm asking you whether you were told that.

MR McCARTER: Not explicitly, no.

MR MALAN: On what basis were you told implicitly then?

MR McCARTER: Well one only had to look at the circumstances of people, the Biko Trial and various other places where the State actually helped those people.

MR MALAN: Did you know that at the time?

MR McCARTER: The Biko Trial was long before this.

MR MALAN: Yes, that's exactly why I'm asking you. You were a young boy of some nine years old at the time of Biko's death, what do you know about the government having protected people then? It was certainly not the government's position then, not publicly.

MR McCARTER: In 1977 I was 20 years old.

MR MALAN: Sorry were you born in '57?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: At that time did you believe that Biko was manhandled and killed by the police?

MR McCARTER: I definitely thought so, yes.

MR MALAN: Why do you say that Taylor would have had instructions or given authority to eliminate Bhila, did he tell you that?

MR McCARTER: No, he didn't, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Why do you assume that someone would have asked him or ordered him or requested him to see to that or do you believe he simply had the authority to make such decisions, that such authority was delegated to him?

MR McCARTER: I can't really say, Mr Chairman, I would take it that the authority was delegated to him.

MR MALAN: Actively and explicitly or implicitly, to use your terminology?

MR McCARTER: I would say implicitly.

MR MALAN: So do you still believe that the government instructed them, that it was government policy and that government would have protected you?

MR McCARTER: I wouldn't say it was government policy and it wasn't openly sort of encouraged or anything like that but it was secretly condoned.

MR MALAN: Why do you say that?

MR McCARTER: No politician or senior policeman was ever instituted, an investigation into any of these incidents.

MR MALAN: There were quite a number of departmental investigations into many of these things, always turned saying that the South African Police was not involved.

MR McCARTER: I think the outcome of those investigations speak for itself, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Right. Now you say that you believed that the, these acts and omissions - I'm referring to 11(a), second paragraph:

Do you stand with those words, "instructions of the government"?

MR McCARTER: Implicit instructions.

MR MALAN: The same goes for the South African Police, implicit or explicit?

MR McCARTER: Implicit, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Did you report after the incident, after the killing to anyone?

MR McCARTER: The only person I may have reported to was Eugene de Kock.

MR MALAN: I'm asking you whether you did report, not whether you might have or may have or whatever. Can you recall that you reported?

MR McCARTER: No, I can't recall, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: In other words you probably did that and just left it, job completed?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Did you report to Taylor?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Were you not supposed to file a report when you get back to Vlakplaas, people there?

MR McCARTER: No, one doesn't commit that sort of thing to paper, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Does one orally report on such things?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: Did you?

MR McCARTER: I can't recall.

MR MALAN: Why do you tell us in your application that there was a personality clash between yourself and Eugene de Kock, and you refer to a fist fight, what is the background to that?

MR McCARTER: It was unrelated to work, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: So in the work situation you had a perfect relationship?

MR McCARTER: Well I would say it was officer to subordinate relationship.

MR MALAN: In some of the statements there's a reference to the fact that when you came down, de Kock was on leave, that he did not instruct you to come down to Durban but that someone else might have done it. I think that's in the 204 statement that has just been circulated to us by Rosslee.

MR McCARTER: It's quite possible, Mr Chairman, I don't know, but it was an ongoing thing that wherever we were requested by a different branch, we would go to that particular area.

MR MALAN: Who would put the request to you?

MR McCARTER: Durban branch would request either Brigadier Schoon on Eugene de Kock.

MR MALAN: Can you recall who instructed you at that time to get down to Durban?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman.

MR MALAN: On the bottom of page 36, page 37 of the bundle, you refer to your joining Koevoet in 1980, the frequent contact with SWAPO insurgents and then you say you witnessed many atrocities committed by the insurgents. Were you not similarly involved in groups with such atrocities?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I can state myself and my group at the time, that none of us were involved in any actions against civilians or whatever, we were purely against armed insurgents.

MR MALAN: The type of action such as the killing of an unarmed person, and in this instance Bhila, simply because he was an activist or whatever, you have no knowledge of similar killings or actions which came to your knowledge since?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, these things have all recently come out in the open. That's basically - some of the things one suspected but I haven't any intimate knowledge of any.

MR MALAN: Just before I ask the last question let me just say to you, one of my main difficulties and we've recently filed our report to the President, is that we have not managed to find out at what level really these instructions or cover-pus of actions after the fact, the protection that you've referred to, at what level that was carried out.

You said earlier, I think you more or less said that you don't believe that the whole of government would have done that at that level, that's not how it functions. Do you have any theory - theory is the wrong word, do you have any understanding following your activities and the protection referred to of at what level that happened, was it at Taylor's level, Taylor and de Kock, talking of the offices occupied? Do you think de Kock reported to a senior or Taylor reported to a senior, do you have any knowledge of that, any understanding of that?

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, not intimate knowledge but I would say that from my understanding that depending on whether there was any danger of something being exposed, the higher up it would then be reported. Should nothing come of the action then it would stay on a need-to-know basis.

MR MALAN: Now that leads directly to my last question. Is this not typical of an activity that took place at a lower level, we at that level took the law into our own hands, we protected South Africa, we know what had to be done, we did it in the cause of the National Party as is said and the government and the South African Police and if only if we're caught out we will seek protection somewhere? Is that not the true construction to be put on this type of activity?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairman, I think it would be a bit naive to think that a couple of Captains and Majors were running the whole security of the country.

MR MALAN: Now you present me with a major difficulty because you're now sort of saying that the eliminating, the killing of activists constitutes the whole security of the county, isn't the whole security of the country a very very wide concept where you were looking at normal prosecution, detentions for times, other policy measures, prevention of certain activities by simply prohibiting, prescribing against meetings etc., etc? I'm talking only of assassinations.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I still say that I don't think that that order would have started at such a low level because had it come out, who would have protected those people, the Captains and the Majors?

MR MALAN: Their loyal seniors.

MR McCARTER: But then by implication they were, it was condoned.

MR MALAN: But that's exactly what I'm heading at, was it not a question of actions which when it became known that it was condoned as apposed to your construction of vesting an authority and giving orders down the line, is that not more likely?

MR McCARTER: It seems a bit unlikely if Minister Vlok and General van der Merwe gave the order for the South African Council of Churches and Cosatu House to blown up, that's terrorism in your own country. So would they then stop or bilk at eliminating an activist?

MR MALAN: Are you seeing eliminating an activist as a more heinous crime or less than bombing a building?

MR McCARTER: Well can't equate a value to a human life but if one's prepared to bomb, and the possibility of life being lost within a bombing incident then it can be equated to a human life.

MR MALAN: You're aware that they applied for amnesty for the bombing of Cosatu House and Khotso House?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairperson.

MR MALAN: Have they applied for any amnesty for killings?

MR McCARTER: No, Mr Chairperson.

MR MALAN: Why do you think they would have ordered that and not apply?

MR McCARTER: There were sufficient testimony to implicate Mr Vlok.

MR MALAN: Are you saying that Mr Vlok was part of a group that decided up front that we need a policy to kill activists that we cannot get convicted in the Court?

MR McCARTER: No, I wouldn't be so bold as to make that statement, Mr Chairperson.

MR MALAN: Then I fail to understand your answer but I think I've more or less pursued this as far as is possible, but it remains something outstanding in my mind as a member of the Commission to try and find out really what happened where. Thank you, Mr McCarter.

CHAIRPERSON: You said no senior policeman ever instituted an investigation into this sort of thing. He wasn't very senior but I take it you have heard of Frank Dutton?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Now what was your relationship with Mr Bosch, what rank did he hold at this time?

MR McCARTER: He was a Sergeant at that time, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: And part of your unit?

MR McCARTER: We operated in different groups. Rosslee was mainly working with me, Bosch came down on one or two occasions at the most. He generally operated in other areas.

CHAIRPERSON: So he was an ordinary member of the police stationed at Vlakplaas?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: And was treated in the same way as the rest of you?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: I'm asking this because in his amnesty application at page 5 he was asked if he got any advantage from this and he said:

And he was given a bonus in cash, did you know about this?

MR McCARTER: It's the first I've heard of it, Mr Chairman.

MR ROUSSOUW: Sorry, Mr Chairman, sorry to interrupt. Roussouw on behalf of Mr Bosch. Mr Chairman, I believe that the section that you are quoting from is out of context. Mr Chairman, I would like to refer you to this specific incident which was supplemented, and you will find it on page 18 of the bundle, which is question 10(c) dealing with this incident, and that question deals with whether there was any financial benefit or not, page 18 Mr Chairman. You will see that the answer there is "no".

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, but the first answer sworn to by him on the 18th of November 1996 was "yes".

MR ROUSSOUW: Indeed, Mr Chairman, ...(intervention)

CHAIRPERSON: He can explain it when he comes to give evidence.

When you were in Koevoet, were you with Mr de Kock at all?

MR McCARTER: I didn't work in the same group as Mr de Kock but we knew one another there.

CHAIRPERSON: Were you in the same area?

MR McCARTER: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: And you were working against armed insurgents?

MR McCARTER: Correct, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: You'd capture them and try to turn them?

MR McCARTER: We did do that, yes, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Because I have heard evidence from Mr de Kock as to how these people were treated. They were tied up, chained for long periods. Did you know of this treatment?

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: And that if they finally were not prepared to turn, they were frequently killed. They couldn't be used for anything else.

MR McCARTER: Yes, Mr Chairman, I heard of instances, yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Unarmed men who'd been in prison for weeks or months were then murdered by the units you were working with, is that so?

MR McCARTER: I don't know of specifics but there was mention of it yes, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, there's just one aspect that has arisen from Commissioner Malan's evidence. ...(inaudible - microphone not on)

Mr McCarter, I just want to put to you, insofar as your evidence may create the impression ...

FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: Mr McCarter, for as far as your evidence would give the impression that in cases such as the Bhila incident, orders were carried out that came from higher up, higher up meaning the Commissioner of Police or the Chief of Security of the Police or the Minister, I want to put it to you that your evidence is entirely without foundation.

MR McCARTER: Mr Chairman, I'm not for one moment saying that General van der Merwe or Minister Vlok or anyone knew Bhila personally or of his circumstances, all I'm saying is that it was a trend that we would have, had we been caught we would have been protected.

MR VISSER: Yes, well lastly on that score I also want to tell you that this, not this Committee but the Amnesty Committee has heard evidence on more than one occasion that that was simply not so. In the police, as far as the higher ranking officers - and I may add that I appear for Mr Vlok, Mr van der Merwe, Mr Coetzee, previous Commissioners of Police, there was never except in exceptional circumstances such as the Stanza Bopape case, there was never protection extended and people who did not tow the line had to take the rap themselves. I put to you that that was the official position.

MR McCARTER: I won't deny it, Mr Chairman.

MR VISSER: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr Chairman, just one aspect. Mr Malan had indicated to the witness - it's not really a question arising but just for the record, that nowhere in the application is the word "order or instruction" used, may I just indicate Mr Malan had later referred to it himself, to paragraph 11(a) where it says specifically:

I just wanted to put the record straight as far as that is concerned, thank you.

MR MALAN: Sorry, this is generally relating to the whole of the application. He says one instance but where it deals with the specifics and we're only dealing with this one incident of Bhila and there are more incidents, so he's identifying Bhila on this paragraph and if he wants to give that evidence he needs to do so.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: I don't want to argue with you Mr Malan, I simply say it has been his evidence all along, that there was just this one incident ...(inaudible)

MR MALAN: Did he not apply for amnesty for other incidents?

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Only for the Cosatu House, but that's not included in here. But there he says specifically in 11(a) that was another direct instruction from Eugene de Kock.

MR MALAN: Thank you.

FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HUGO: Mr Chairman, may I be permitted just to deal with one matter that has been raised by Mr Malan, as you know I act on behalf of Mr de Kock. May I just address one question to Mr McCarter?

Mr McCarter, I foresaw the possibility that this question was going to be asked as to whether you reported back to Mr de Kock. We canvassed the issue with him, and let me put it to you that Mr de Kock says he blissfully unaware of this particular incident until fairly recently, about a years ago when he had been advised by the Attorney-General's office of this particular incident.

When you testified that you did report to him you said, I think words to the effect that you think you told him or you weren't sure, are you absolutely sure and convinced of it that you did report to Mr de Kock?

MR McCARTER: I think my evidence will state that I wasn't sure at all, I can't recall.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: May the witness stand back, Mr Chairman, there's no other evidence in his application that we intend to put forward.

CHAIRPERSON: ...(inaudible)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman. The next applicant is Mr Bosch. I ask that the witness be sworn in.

I D BOSCH: (sworn states)

EXAMINATION BY MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Mr Chairman, you will find the application of Mr Bosch from page 1 to 21 in bundle 1 of Bhila.

Mr Bosch, have you got that application in front of you?

MR BOSCH: I have it.

MR ROUSSOUW: Do you confirm the contents of your statement on page 1?

MR BOSCH: That's correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: Regarding your career in the South African Police, can you confirm that in 1977 you joined the South African Police at the uniform branch in Pretoria?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: And thereafter in 1979 you were transferred to the Trade Union desk of the Security Branch?

MR BOSCH: That's correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: And in the early '80's, in 1982 you were transferred to the Intelligence Unit in Johannesburg?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: And then in 1983 you returned to the Intelligence Unit at headquarters in Pretoria, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: Correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: And in 1985 you went to Vlakplaas.

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: You left Vlakplaas for the Directorate of Covert Collections and you worked there until 1993, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch you apply for amnesty and the affidavit which you find on page and which you signed on page 7 was a prescribed form which you completed?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: And on page 2 you refer to the incidents for which you apply for and the statement you made to the Attorney-General, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: And this was supplemented with regard to the specific incidents and the extract from that supplementary statement you would find on page 11 to page 21. That deals specifically with the Bhila incident, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: And just to get clarity, please have regard to page 5 of the bundle where you refer to the question as to whether you gained anything financially or otherwise, in this incident, the Bhila incident, did you gain financially in any way?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: You did not receive a cash bonus in connection with this incident?

MR BOSCH: No, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, could I take you to page 11 or excuse me, page 13. You apply for amnesty and more specifically as an accomplice to murder ...(no English translation) for the death of an ANC member at the Natal South Coast during 1986 or 1987, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: It would seem that it is the incident of Bhila?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: At the stage when you completed this affidavit you did not have any knowledge of the identity of the deceased? ...(transcriber's own translation)

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: You are also not sure of the date of the murder?

MR BOSCH: No, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, can you just read on page 14 what your knowledge concerning this incident is?

ADV PRIOR: Sorry, Mr Chairman, Mr Roussouw is going a little fast, the interpreters or the translators have just indicated if he could slow down please.

MR ROUSSOUW: I'm sorry, Mr Chairman.

MR BOSCH:

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, can I interrupt you there? This request to go to this specific neighbourhood, was that given to you directly by Colonel Taylor or were you informed of it?

MR BOSCH: I was informed about it, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: You heard the evidence here that a meeting took place or a gathering between Colonel Taylor, Mr McCarter and Mr Rosslee, you weren't involved in such a meeting?

MR BOSCH: No, Mr Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: Please continue.

MR BOSCH:

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, you heard the evidence that it was a Railway Police shooting range, did you know at that stage that it was a shooting range? ...(transcriber's own translation)

MR BOSCH: No, Mr Chairperson, I did not know what place that was.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, while you were present in Durban, did you know the area?

MR BOSCH: Not at all Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: How many times did you yourself work in Durban as part of a Vlakplaas contingency?

MR BOSCH: There might have been incident before this incident or after the incident but I usually worked in Eastern Transvaal. ...(transcriber's own translation)

MR ROUSSOUW: Proceed.

MR BOSCH:

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, you also heard the evidence that this particular person was handed over or was intercepted after he was taken from a certain place by Askaris, were you present, can you remember it?

MR BOSCH: Mr Chairperson, I could have been present but I cannot remember it at all.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, at any stage while you were driving in this bus, did you converse, did anybody tell you where you were on your way to?

MR BOSCH: No, Mr Chairman, we did not talk in the bus, it was very quiet.

MR ROUSSOUW:

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, you heard the evidence and the questions which were asked regarding these weapons. At that stage were you issued with a similar weapon?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I only had my official police weapon with me, I didn't have a Baby Browning with me.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, when you completed your amnesty application you did not know what the identity of the deceased was, and on page 17 of the bundle you refer to the fact that know a docket was opened and that might have contained further information, is that correct, do you confirm that?

MR BOSCH: Yes, I confirm that, Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, on page 17 could you please continue and tell the Committee what your political objective was, the one you wanted to attain with your actions?

MR BOSCH:

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, as far as your personal knowledge is concerned before and during this operation, would you also submit this to the Committee please, on page 18.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, you've already testified that you gained no financial, you didn't get any financial gain because of your actions, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: Yes, that is correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: And you also mention that the operation was executed and the people who were there and who took responsibility for all of this was McCarter and Taylor, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, can I just then take you to page 20 of the statement. Do you confirm that that is your handwriting, or your signature rather?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR ROUSSOUW: And you also ask the Committee to take notice that because of the long time which has passed you do have certain problems to recollect some of the specifics concerning this incident?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR ROUSSOUW: You also mention that since the incident you've deliberately tried to forget about it and to ...(end of tape)

...(inaudible) Mr McCater, that he would have been the person that would have explained to you the purpose of this operation. If you think back, can you remember if he actually did that and if so, when?

MR BOSCH: Chairman, I want to try to remember but I can't, it could have been in the morning whilst we were sitting in the park, he could have explain to my whilst we were driving back in the evening but I really cannot remember.

MR MALAN: Can you just clarify that please? Did you not say in your evidence-in-chief that you sat there the whole day and you didn't know what was going on and you were only informed by McCarter after you completed this operation?

MR BOSCH: That is correct Chairperson, I didn't know exactly what was going on. Because I did not work in Durban I did not have the background of this person, only later did they tell me how he fitted into this picture and what was happening.

MR MALAN: Did they tell you this before he was shot or afterwards?

MR BOSCH: No, I think it was on the way back.

MR MALAN: But you said in your evidence-in-chief that it was only after you went back that he told you.

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR MALAN: And now I hear you saying that he could have told you this in the morning while you were sitting in the park but you're not sure when.

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I'm trying to remember but I cannot, I wish I could because it would make it easier for me if I could remember but I cannot.

MR MALAN: But if it was the case that he told you in the morning then it means that you knew that before he was shot why he was going to be shot.

MR BOSCH: That's possible.

MR MALAN: So why do you say under oath that he did not know that he was going to be shot?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I'm trying to remember, I cannot.

MR MALAN: So what value should be attach to your statement then?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I can just say what I remember at the point when I made the statement. Now today I can remember more things but when I made the statement I really could not remember.

MR MALAN: But you're making statements about things you cannot remember. You say now you cannot remember and yet you make a statement about it.

Mr Roussouw, maybe you should lead us here. I do not know what we should consider to be his evidence and what not his evidence.

MR ROUSSOUW: Maybe I should clear that up with questioning.

Mr Bosch, as far as the motivation is concerned and the circumstances surrounding the person's arrest and the things which then happened, is it your recollection that when you were informed about those details and the background concerning all of this, was it given to you by McCarter after the man was shot? In other words the motivation for the murder.

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson, that is the way I remember it.

MR ROUSSOUW: Very well. In your statement you also mention that before the shooting incident you were not informed about what would happen, you do mention that you had a suspicion that he was going to be shot. Now my question is, can you remember that Mr McCarter told you before the shooting incident that this person would be shot?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I don't want to admit or deny it, I cannot say. It might be that he told me beforehand but I cannot remember.

MR MALAN: I really don't know if this is going if this is going take this any further. You said explicitly and you say it under oath and you also read this, but you don't qualify it. You were sitting in the park the whole day, you tried to find out what was going on but you couldn't find out. You've read the statement to us under oath but now you do not want to confirm what you're written under oath as well as testified under oath. What value can we attach to your evidence or what kind of value? Nevermind.

Mr Roussouw, please continue.

MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

Mr Bosch, you also heard the evidence that - this is now by Mr McCarter, that Spyker Mhieza was not present when this operation was launched, and you said in your statement that according to your memory he was indeed there. Is that your recollection?

MR BOSCH: When I made the statement Chairperson, it was indeed my recollection but I might be wrong.

MR MALAN: What is your recollection now?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, as I heard the people speaking this morning, Mr McCarter that is, it creates the idea that I was in the bus, Rosslee was in the bus, McCarter was in the bus, Wasserman was in the bus and something tells me that there were also two black members. I said three but then I'm making a mistake.

MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman, that is the applicant's application.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

Mr Bosch, your evidence on page 13 of your application which you also repeated today, the fact that you drove behind Wasserman towards this shooting range, I'm putting it to you this is incorrect, Wasserman and Taylor arrived at the shooting range after you guys were there already.

MR BOSCH: That is possible, Chairperson.

MR VISSER: You also said that material, a cloth was pulled over Bhila's head there at the precipice. My information is that this hood was already placed on his head in the car and that his hands were cuffed behind his back and that he was taken in that condition towards the precipice and it was only after he was killed that the hood was removed from his head as well as the cuffs, what do you say about that?

MR BOSCH: I remember the hood, I remember the cuffs but I do not know when it was put on his hands. I remember the cuffs were taken off just before he was thrown off the cliff.

MR VISSER: That concludes my questions, thank you Mr Chairman.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Thank you, Chairperson.

Mr Bosch, this incident took place about 12 years ago, is it possible that in your memory there might be a few gaps with regards to what had happened during these incidents?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson. Like I've read before I would like to forget these things, I don't want to have them in my thoughts anymore.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: You made no specific notes which you could then look at later in order to help you recollect what had happened?

MR BOSCH: No, I made no notes.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: I'm asking you specifically because in your statement you referred to Spyker Mhieza and Mgade and insofar as it concerns Sergeant Mgade I understand your evidence now that you could have been incorrect and it's quite possible that he was not present at all.

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: You also have heard when my learned colleague, Mr Prior and Hugo referred to travelling documents which makes it quite clear that Mgade was not together with the team and he did not receive and S&T, so we accept the possibilities or the probabilities are that he was in fact not present.

MR BOSCH: I accept that.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: With regards to my other client, and maybe I can just put it this way, go one back, I received instructions from Mr Mgade and his instructions are that he was not involved in this incident at all and he was not present at all.

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Chairperson.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: With regards to Mr Mhieza, the man who went by the nickname of Spyker, is it so that at one point there was another person stationed at Vlakplaas with the nickname Spyker?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, yes.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: And this Mr Mhieza or Spyker, where was he stationed?

MR BOSCH: This Spyker was at the Durban Branch, he was stationed there.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Do I understand your evidence correctly today, that with regards to his presence there is also a vagueness in your memory, you could be making a mistake with regards to his presence?

MR BOSCH: Yes, that is correct.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr Bosch, you also heard the evidence of Mr McCarter with regard to the amount of influence on a political level which you as members of Security Branch experienced. I'm using "influence" in the wider sense of the word, you can also say indoctrination. Was it also your personal experience?

MR BOSCH: Yes, we were exposed to daily and weekly reviews which we had to read. ...(transcriber's own translation)

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Is it also your evidence that you were yourself influenced by all of this?

MR BOSCH: Yes, that is correct, Chairperson.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: With regard to the operation itself, the Bhila incident, just a few questions. In the first place, in your mind who would you say was in complete control of everything that happened there?

MR BOSCH: Colonel Taylor.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: At that specific stage did you feel that this whole operation and that which transpired there, and again I use the word "operation" in the wider sense of the word, that this was normal, in line with your daily duties?

MR BOSCH: Yes.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Did you also feel that you could question these instructions?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: And according to your observations during this incident, did you have the impression that anybody was in the position to question these instructions?

MR BOSCH: Not according to myself, Mr Chairperson.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: With regard to ...(intervention)

MR MALAN: May I just ask you, to which instructions are you referring?

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: I refer to the instructions to kill Bhila. I will deal with in it a bit more detail just now.

It's common cause that you were not present when McCarter received these instructions?

MR BOSCH: That's correct.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: And today, and you were also asked a few questions by Mr Malan, do you say that it's possible that there whilst you were at the shooting range which is now called a municipal park, whilst you were sitting there, is it possible that a discussion was then held with regards to what would happen to this man and what his identity is?

MR BOSCH: That's quite possible but I cannot say I'm 100% sure about when they told me all of this.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: If one tries to be realistic I'm sure you wouldn't have sat there the whole day and not have asked "why are we sitting here, who is this person".

MR BOSCH: They did tell me that he was a member of the ANC and he was a trained member and he was arrested.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Now with regards to your version about what had happened ...(intervention)

MR MALAN: Sorry that I'm interrupting you again.

INTERPRETER: The speaker's microphone.

MR MALAN: On what basis can you say with so much certainty that they would have told you this is a trained ANC terrorist? You can remember that really specifically, you keep confirming it but you can't remember anything else, can you remember who told you that?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson, I cannot remember who told me that, that's my problem. I don't know it it's McCarter who told me, I don't know what he told me, I don't know when he told me all of this. It would have been very much easier for myself if I knew this and then I could tell.

MR MALAN: You would have made it much easier for us as well.

MR BOSCH: Yes, I know, Chairperson.

MR MALAN: Because if we are not satisfied that you are telling us the truth, whether we want to or not we cannot give you amnesty.

MR BOSCH: I realise that, Chairperson but I really cannot remember.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Mr Bosch, seen in that light - you also heard the evidence of McCarter with regards to exactly what happened at the shooting incident and also what happened to the body of the deceased, the fact that he was thrown over the cliff, seen in the light of the problems you have remembering as you sit here today is it possible that Mr McCarter's version is true?

MR BOSCH: Yes, it could be the correct version.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Surely a man would not come here and admit that he'd a body over a precipice if he did not indeed do that?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Chairperson.

MR VAN SCHALKWYK: Thank you, Chairperson.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR HUGO: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

Mr Bosch, we are provided with an affidavit of Mr Ernest Ramatala, and I'm sure it will be handed in later by Mr Prior as soon as Mr Ramatala is called, there are just two aspects I want to discuss with you. Firstly I'd like to tell you that Mr Ramatala says amongst other, that during this incident Mr de Kock was on leave, that was when you were sent from Vlakplaas to Durban. Can you remember if that is indeed the truth?

MR BOSCH: Yes, it could be correct, I cannot remember.

MR HUGO: And Mr Ramatala says further that his recollection is that you, Mr Bosch, drove in a beige BMW. It's not quite evident from the affidavit but can you remember something like that, can you remember coming with a BMW from Pretoria to Durban?

MR BOSCH: Yes, I do remember. Mr de Kock's vehicle was the white BMW and I when he was on leave I drove it, so he must have been on leave. ...(transcriber's own translation)

MR HUGO: Then Mr Ramatala also said in his affidavit that there were order groups which were addressed by McCarter. Did you ever attend these order groups, the ones which were addressed by Mr McCarter?

MR BOSCH: Maybe some of them, maybe not all of them but it wasn't really my working area, my work area, my field of work was in the Eastern Transvaal.

MR HUGO: I have no further questions, thank you, Mr Chairman.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR NGUBANE: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

Mr Bosch, you are a trained policeman, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: And you know the importance of an affidavit?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: And when you prepared your affidavit were you legally assisted?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: I saw you nod your head and look at the legal representative, did you think of denying that you were legally represented?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson, I made two statements, one without a legal representative and one with one.

MR NGUBANE: Alright. Now in your statement when you mentioned the people who were with you when this operation was undertaken, you categorically stated their names, do you recall?

MR BOSCH: Please repeat your question.

MR NGUBANE: In your statement when - let's look at page 15, paragraph 2, you mention Michael and Spyker as well as a black member of Vlakplaas who you think is Aubrey Mgade, Frank McCarter and Rosslee as well as Wasserman, do you agree?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Mr Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: And there was nothing preventing you from saying that "I do not recall who the people were but I think that those people were this and this and this one", is that right?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I know Michael and Spyker worked together in Durban and my recollection tells me that Spyker and Michael were there that evening. Mr McCarter says something. I don't want to dispute that, I don't want to admit or deny it.

MR NGUBANE: I see. No, my question in just simple, in your affidavit at no stage did you say "I think that so and so was present but I'm not sure", do you agree?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: Yes, coming to what you have said now, McCarter said something else and you don't want to say he is lying, is that right?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, maybe his memory is better than mine which I actually think might be the case.

MR NGUBANE: Is it not the position that you want your evidence to be as corroborative as you can of that of Mr McCarter?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson, not at all.

MR NGUBANE: In any event Mr McCarter was your senior, is that right?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: And when he was your senior you didn't want to contradict him, is that right?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: Now Taylor, on the day of this incident did you personally meet Mr Taylor?

MR BOSCH: I saw Taylor in the park.

MR NGUBANE: You didn't meet him at CR Swart Square, is that right?

MR BOSCH: Not as far as I can remember, no.

MR NGUBANE: What was he doing in the park?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, everybody just stood around and waited.

MR NGUBANE: Did you speak to Mr Taylor in the park?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, because it was only my second time in Durban - I met Taylor before but I wasn't really on such a level with him that I would speak to him. I respected him and I greeted him and that was it.

MR NGUBANE: How much time did you spend with Mr Taylor in the park?

MR BOSCH: One whole day, Sir.

MR NGUBANE: Pardon?

MR BOSCH: One whole day, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: Now this comrade policeman, you stay with him in the park for the whole day, you only greet him and you don't speak to him any further?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, we did not speak about Bhila, maybe I spoke to him about other things, irrelevant things.

MR NGUBANE: My question was simple, I did not ask whether you spoke to him about Bhila or not, I asked you whether you spoke to him and you told me an irrelevant thing, that you only greeted him. If there were other irrelevant things, can you tell me why you didn't tell me about that?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I did not make small talk with Colonel Taylor, if he asked me something I would have answered him but I did not talk with him, I did not chat with him.

MR NGUBANE: Well those irrelevant things, were they not small talk?

MR BOSCH: It can be small talk, Sir.

MR NGUBANE: So you are contradicting yourself, you say you didn't conduct small talk with Taylor and in the same breath you say that you spoke about irrelevant things which could be small talk, do you understand yourself?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I'm saying maybe I could have discussed irrelevant things with Mr Taylor or made small talk, but I cannot say that I did not or I did.

MR NGUBANE: Did Mr Taylor in the park at any stage indicate to you that Bhila was an ANC man?

MR BOSCH: It's possible, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: Are you suggesting that you can't recall?

MR BOSCH: I cannot recall.

MR NGUBANE: Can you tell when - just collect your mind now, can you tell when you learnt that Bhila was an ANC man, was it in the park or was it where he was assassinated or was it on your way back from the assassination?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, as far as I can remember someone told me, I don't know if it was Frank or someone else in the park or on the way there, is that this person was an ANC trained person and he was connected with the bomb explosions and on the way back he informed me that he was involved in a court case and that hew as acquitted. That is the way I remember it.

MR NGUBANE: I see. The interpretation I got - I'm listening to the English interpretation, is that you were told as you were moving to the park, is that your evidence?

MR BOSCH: That's why I say I'm not sure if, whilst we were going to the park or whether it was in the park or wherever, I do not know when they told me. I know that they told me he was an ANC member but I don't know when they told me this.

MR NGUBANE: And when he arrived in the park being handcuffed, what impression did you gain of him?

MR BOSCH: That they've just arrested an ANC member and they've brought him in now.

MR NGUBANE: So you must have known before he could come to the park, that he was an ANC man?

MR BOSCH: Possibly, Sir.

MR NGUBANE: And when he arrived in the park, did you know that he was going to be killed?

MR BOSCH: That's where my problem lies, I cannot remember where I heard that he will be killed, whether it was in the park, on the way to the park, wherever. I cannot remember. If I could I will tell you but I can't remember when I was told this.

MR NGUBANE: Were you killing an ANC man for the first time on that day?

MR BOSCH: Just repeat the question please, Mr Chairman.

MR NGUBANE: Was it the first time that you were involved in the killing of an ANC man?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson, in these type of circumstances, similar circumstances, yes.

MR NGUBANE: If you say similar circumstances, you mean an innocent man who has been detained and was going to be killed unarmed, is that what you mean?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson. It was the first I got involved in something like this, where a person was taken and simply shot.

MR NGUBANE: And did you do that again thereafter?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: That must have been a cultural shock to you, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: It was not only a cultural shock but spiritual as well.

MR NGUBANE: So that must have left an everlasting impression in your mind?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, my whole police career since I joined the Security Force, left scars in my life.

MR NGUBANE: But this particular incident, can you equate it to any other experience that you have every had?

MR BOSCH: No, Sir.

MR NGUBANE: So my difficulty is, this thing is happening to yourself, it's causing you some cultural shock of unequalled enormity and you are vague about the details. It surprises me why you can't remember the details of this particular incident which was outstanding in your life.

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, this incident and the other incidents I did not afterwards go and talk to people about this and discuss it with them. I wanted to forget it, I wanted to get it our of my system, it just had to get out.

MR NGUBANE: And when did you decide to apply for amnesty?

MR BOSCH: In November 1996. Ja, they received it in 96/12/12.

MR NGUBANE: I'm not asking about the date when you submitted your amnesty application, I'm just interested in the date when you had this cleansing of the soul and decided to come clean on the matter, when did that happen to you?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, when they said we could apply for amnesty and we had to make everything public. I cannot recall what the date was, it was said when we were all told to apply for amnesty.

MR NGUBANE: And you were also told that if you applied for amnesty you would be forgiven, you won't be prosecuted, is that right?

MR BOSCH: Chairman, I know that if you apply for amnesty you have to make a full disclosure and I am not trying to hide anything otherwise I would not be sitting here. I just want to get it our of my life.

MR NGUBANE: Well don't anticipate my questions, I have not at any stage indicated to you that you are hiding anything, why do you jump to that?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I'm not jumping to conclusions, I'm just saying that I know there are certain requirements that I have to comply with to apply for amnesty, so I cannot come and sit here and talk nonsense and think that I should receive amnesty just for sitting here. I can tell you what happened as I recall it from 12 years back.

MR NGUBANE: Right, but at the time you decided to apply for amnesty it was about 10 years back, is that correct?

CHAIRPERSON: 2 years.

MR NGUBANE: In 1996, Sir. I stand corrected.

CHAIRPERSON: Not 10 or twelve, 2 years. Oh, 10 years after the incident?

MR NGUBANE: Yes, yes. So it was - the events must have been fresher than they are at the moment, is that correct?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I can now recall more than I could two years ago when I handed in this application, because I did not consult or talk with anyone about the incident or phone and say: "What happened that day", I did it on my own and I wanted to get it over with, as I could remember it.

MR NGUBANE: Now reference has been made to a submission by van der Merwe - I suppose it's bundle 2 that has been referred to now and again, do you also ...(intervention)

MR ROUSSOUW: Sorry, Mr Chairman, we were not placed in possession of that bundle so I think questions would be a little bit unfair, unless you can place it before the applicant.

MR NGUBANE: Okay, well I won't pursue that.

CHAIRPERSON: The large bundle 1, page 126, that's in the assassination of Ndwandwe, Ntseni, Ntjale, Ndlovu and Vilagazi.

ADV PRIOR: Mr Chairman, it's the problem the Committee anticipated, that reference is going to now be made to the General's submissions and Mr Roussouw it would seem was furnished with the bundles only peculiar to the Bhila application. However we've made a copy available to him.

CHAIRPERSON: Well I have no doubt ...(no sound) to in a great many applications.

MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Chairman, I've seen it before but I can't give the evidence.

MR NGUBANE: Mr Bosch, have you seen the submissions by Mr van der Merwe at any stage or were you apprised of the submissions of Mr van der Merwe at any stage?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, which van der Merwe is it, is it General van der Merwe?

CHAIRPERSON: The Commissioner.

MR BOSCH: The Commissioner. I was at the hearing of Cosatu House and I heard what he had said.

MR NGUBANE: And do you align yourself with his submissions?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: Before I go to the submissions by van der Merwe, do you agree with me that this amnesty application provided you with an opening for you to escape prosecution and you rushed to grab that opportunity?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: Are you applying for amnesty because you want to avoid prosecution or are you applying for amnesty because you want the world to know the truth of what happened?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I apply for amnesty to receive amnesty and so that everybody can know what happened in the past.

MR NGUBANE: So actually your motivation is to receive amnesty and not be prosecuted?

MR BOSCH: Partially yes.

MR NGUBANE: Now at page 177 van der Merwe says:

That's paragraph 15.2.

Do you agree with that statement?

MR BOSCH: I agree, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: And does the statement apply to you?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I am here to speak the truth, I speak the truth as I remember it. That is why I am here, otherwise I would not be here.

MR NGUBANE: No, what I mean is that as a human being does this statement apply to you, if you want some benefit are you prepared to lie and exaggerate, being a human being referred to by Mr van der Merwe?

MR MALAN: ...(inaudible) from, Mr Ngubane? Can you just refer us to where you read from?

MR NGUBANE: It's page 177 of bundle 2, paragraph 15.2.

MR VISSER: If I may be permitted to interrupt, Mr Chairman, that is not the statement of General van der Merwe, that is the Foundation for Equality before the Law, by General Stadler.

CHAIRPERSON: As I said earlier, van der Merwe is in volume 1, General van der Merwe.

MR MALAN: Mr Ngubane?

MR NGUBANE: Oh, I'm sorry.

MR MALAN: What you read from starts on page 169 in bundle 2 and that is a submission compiled by Stadler on behalf of the Foundation for Equality before the Law.

MR NGUBANE: No, I'm sorry that I misled the witness, I thought that was van der Merwe.

MR MALAN: It's the same statement, it's just a different author.

MR NGUBANE: Major General S D Stadler, do you know him?

MR BOSCH: Yes, Chairperson, I know him.

MR NGUBANE: And do you agree with what I've read to you?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I agree with the piece that you have read now, I did not read the whole thing.

MR NGUBANE: Now you have tried to explain paragraph 2 of page 15, the name Spyker, and in my mind an impression was created that you were trying to create the picture that this Spyker you were talking about was a Vlakplaas man. You made a mistake and referred to Spyker who was in Vlakplaas, is that what you were trying to do?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson, not at all. A person next to me asked if there was a Spyker at Vlakplaas and yes, there was a person there but he was not involved with this incident. I did not refer to him when I said this Spyker is Vlakplaas's Spyker, I said that my suspicion or I remember that Spyker from Durban was on the mountain with us.

MR NGUBANE: Well what do you mean if you say your suspicion was that Spyker from Durban was involved?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, at the time when I wrote this statement in my mind I had a picture that Michael and Spyker were involved. It was proven incorrect here today but I then made a mistake. ...(transcriber's own translation)

MR NGUBANE: Do you know Spyker Mhieza from Durban?

MR BOSCH: I did see him once or twice Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: Do you know where you had seen him?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, he was always with - if there were routine investigations then he worked with the black members of Vlakplaas, the Askaris and they handled them, not handled but they worked in groups and that is how I know Spyker.

MR NGUBANE: Were you ever involved with him in any murder of any person?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson, no operations nothing. I just knew of his existence and I knew he worked with Lawrie Wasserman.

MR NGUBANE: If this man was never at any stage involved in any murder with you, can you explain why you would make such a huge mistake and involve him in this outstanding encounter in your life and say he was there if that was not so?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, that's the chance one takes when one writes something like this after so many years.

MR NGUBANE: When you compiled this affidavit were you taking chances or were you coming clean of what you know?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, at the time I wrote this I thought that I want to write down everything that I can recall and if I did not put down Spyker's name here and he was there and I might have forgotten about it, it would also be a problem for me. I do not want to implicate him in something but according to my thoughts my head tells me that he was there but I could be wrong.

MR NGUBANE: You have spoken about taking chances, a chance that one takes. Were you taking a chance when you compiled the affidavit or were you coming out clean?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I want to come clean, I'm not taking any chances.

MR NGUBANE: So why now refer to that's the chance that a person takes if he makes a statement?

CHAIRPERSON: If you made an affidavit about something that happened 10 years ago, would you be confident that everything in it was correct?

MR NGUBANE: I'm worried about the word "change", Mr Chair, I think it's important.

CHAIRPERSON: He's relying on his memory and he says "My memory is not 100% accurate", isn't that taking a chance?

MR NGUBANE: My worry, Mr Chairman, is that in his affidavit he doesn't say that "from my recollection I think this is correct", he's very positive about these facts and today he says that that's a chance that one takes. And in the light of the fact that one is required to make a full disclosure, I respectfully submit ...(intervention)

CHAIRPERSON: He's made a full disclosure and he's told us today he still thinks that man was there, he has been contradicted by a previous witness. As I understand his evidence it is that he still believes that Spyker was there.

MR NGUBANE: Mr Chairman, his recent evidence was that he said he still believed that that man was there but he has just said that since the first witness said that man was not there, he concedes that that man was not there.

MR MALAN: I wonder as a person whose first language is Afrikaans, I understood him to say: "When I made my statement I had to make as full a disclosure as possible. The risk involved is that one may put in things that then turn out not to have been so because you to rely on your memory". So "chance" might as well have been a synonym in this instance for risk taking. I hope that helps you because I didn't see anything - but you may pursue if you want to, I didn't see anything intended to go beyond stating the obvious there.

MR NGUBANE: Thank you very much. I got it as "chance" then I was worried about that, then for the explanation I thank you for that.

MR BOSCH: Mr Chairperson, on page 20 I wrote:

MR MALAN: My trouble there is because most of the applicants make this submission in their application, but you can continue.

MR NGUBANE: Thank you.

You still maintain that you are not sure whether you were informed about the details of Mr Bhila on your way back from killing him or before you could kill him?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson, I am still not sure.

MR NGUBANE: Did the first applicant at any stage tell you that Mr Taylor had given him a request to kill Mr Bhila?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

MR NGUBANE: So you were not aware of an order or an instruction or a request form Mr Taylor to kill this man?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I received my instructions from Mr McCarter and as far as I know, and it has also come to light here, that Mr McCarter and Colonel Taylor made the arrangements for this.

MR NGUBANE: And are you still positive that at the park Mr Taylor at no stage told you that this man should be killed?

MR BOSCH: Not Mr Taylor, I cannot tell.

MR NGUBANE: Thank you, Mr Chairman, no further questions.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY ADV PRIOR: Mr Bosch, what was your role or your purpose at this shooting range, I do not understand it clearly. What were doing there?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I didn't have a function, I was just there.

ADV PRIOR: Until almost sundown as you say, you just sat there in the park?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson, and I did drive up the mountain with them.

ADV PRIOR: What were the arrangements for lunch, did you braai there?

MR BOSCH: As far as I can recall they bought cold drinks for us, we did not eat. I cannot recall us eating there.

ADV PRIOR: And this detainee, Bhila, did he receive anything to eat?

MR BOSCH: Not to eat but to drink, yes. I don't even think we had something to eat.

ADV PRIOR: But how did he drink, he was handcuffed?

MR BOSCH: If I recall correctly, at that stage he had chains around his ankles. I cannot recall correctly but I think he had chains around his ankles.

ADV PRIOR: Was he questioned?

MR BOSCH: No, he was not questioned.

ADV PRIOR: Do you recall if he was questioned? Would you remember if he was questioned? Was he assaulted?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson, he was not assaulted.

ADV PRIOR: Your evidence as I understand it when you read it out on page 16, you were informed coming back from the murder on Bhila, that he was an ANC activist.

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, as I can recall when we drove back, when Rosslee, Frank and I were alone in the car I asked him more about it and I wanted to know where this man fits in and then he told me the finer details.

ADV PRIOR: Mr Bosch, it's a simple question. We would like to know from you what was in your mind when you drove up the mountain, did you realise that you were in the process of murdering Mr Bhila or did this not come to your mind?

MR BOSCH: Yes, it did.

ADV PRIOR: Thank you. So you knew when you left the shooting range, you were on your way to a place where Bhila would have been murdered?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Chairperson.

ADV PRIOR: And in the vehicle, this sack, was it on his head?

MR BOSCH: When we started driving the bag was on his head. It was a little bit dark but if cars pulled up next to you and they see somebody with a bag over his head, I think the bag was placed on his head a little later.

ADV PRIOR: At the place where he was eventually shot, did Mr Wasserman get out of the vehicle?

MR BOSCH: As far as I can recall everybody got out of the vehicle.

ADV PRIOR: At the place where he was shot later?

MR BOSCH: That's correct.

ADV PRIOR: Did anybody speak to him?

MR BOSCH: Not as far as I can recall.

ADV PRIOR: When he was shot, did he sit down, kneel down, did he stand?

MR BOSCH: He was sitting at that stage, Mr Chairperson.

ADV PRIOR: Do you recall who shot him?

MR BOSCH: Yes, Frank and Rosslee.

ADV PRIOR: Who shot first?

MR BOSCH: That I cannot recall, Chairperson.

ADV PRIOR: When he was shot by the first person did he fall?

MR BOSCH: No, he just stayed sitting.

ADV PRIOR: After the first shot?

MR BOSCH: Yes, as far as I recall.

ADV PRIOR: Or did both people shoot him simultaneously?

MR BOSCH: No, it was not a shot and then a shot, it was just two shots and then it was finished.

ADV PRIOR: And who threw him over the precipice?

MR BOSCH: As far as I can recall it was Spyker and Michael but I might be wrong, that Spyker wasn't there.

ADV PRIOR: We know the area was not known to you. We have a request from the family as to where you disposed of Mr Bhila's body and this request is made to all the applicants. If in the following days you can come together and try and indicate the place more or less. It is very important for the family of Mr Bhila to know where the body is or where the body was disposed of.

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, with the greatest love I will to help to find it but I think the one could most, I'm not trying to say it is him, it could maybe be Lawrie he knows the area and I'm willing to help.

MR VISSER: Mr Chairman, may I ask the witness to stick to surnames instead of using christian names, I find it terribly confusing.

ADV PRIOR: A last aspect. In Mr Rosslee's application for amnesty, page 24 of the first bundle he says:

And I quote, perhaps I can quote the English:

Do you recall anything like that?

MR BOSCH: No, Mr Chairperson.

ADV PRIOR: I would like to put it to you, according to Mr Rosslee's testimony and Mr McCarter's testimony there was a group and this information would have come to you as a group or to McCarter alone when you were not with the group.

MR BOSCH: Mr Chairperson, as I recall it I cannot recall if I was deployed with them in Durban or whether they called me from another place but because they worked here so long in this area I did not interfere with their arrangements and planning that they had with the local branch's people. If there was any work they gave me the work and I did it.

ADV PRIOR: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

RE-EXAMINATION BY MR ROUSSOUW: Mr Bosch, it was put to you by Mr Prior that at a stage when you left the park up the mountain you knew that Bhila was to be killed. According to your recollection, was this an inference that you drew or was this a fact that you recall that Mr McCarter or any of the persons have told you?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, this is where my problem is today, I cannot recall who said what to me and when, I cannot say.

MR ROUSSOUW: From the situation, would you have drawn such an inference?

MR BOSCH: I could have drawn an inference, yes.

MR ROUSSOUW: Thank you, Mr Chairman.

ADV SIGODI: Just to follow on on what Mr Prior asked you. His question was: "What was your role at the shooting range"? What I want to find out from you is what were you doing there the whole day?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, we just sat there and waited. We conversed with each other and we just waited. I read a book or a newspaper and just waited.

ADV SIGODI: Where was the deceased at this time, was he in a separate room or was he in the same room as you were?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, we were not in a room we were outside and he just sat there next to us.

ADV SIGODI: Did you not seek to extract any information from him at any stage?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson, not at all.

ADV SIGODI: Then why did you stay the whole day and not ask what is going to happen to this person, why are we being kept here, what is the purpose of him being here the whole day until sunset when he was taken to the place where he was killed?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, we got there early in the morning and we waited for it to get dark.

ADV SIGODI: Precisely, that's why I want to find out why you had to wait until it was dark.

MR BOSCH: So that we could take the arrested person away.

ADV SIGODI: And take him where to?

MR BOSCH: To kill him.

ADV SIGODI: In other words you knew that you were waiting for sunset for it to be dark so that you can take him away in order to kill him?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

ADV SIGODI: And you also knew that throughout the course of the day whilst you were waiting?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Chairperson, but I don't know what time I was informed about it.

ADV SIGODI: But the main purpose of you staying there was to wait until dark so that you could take this person in order to go and kill him?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

ADV SIGODI: The other aspect which I want to cover from you is, you say that this incident was not just a cultural shock, it was also a spiritual shock for you and afterwards you did not want to go and talk about it, you wanted to get it out of your system and at the same time you say that this is the only incident that you were involved in that was of this nature.

You say you felt guilty or you wanted to get it out of your system, didn't you at that time believe that what you were doing was the right thing to do? Didn't you believe that you were doing the proper thing as a member of security?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, at that stage I was a member of the anti-terrorist unit and there was a war between us and the ANC/SACP.

ADV SIGODI: Yes, that's precisely what I want to cover with you, what was actually going on in your mind, because you give us the impression that you had a spiritual shock and you wanted to forget about it but at the same time you give us this impression that what you were doing you believed in, you were actually doing, the thing which you were doing was the right thing to do. It's what you believed in because you believed you were at war with the ANC.

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson. I wouldn't go and kill someone who is not my enemy, not at all, I wouldn't be able to do it but this, I do not know how to explain this to you, it gave one the ability to do this.

ADV SIGODI: The problem I'm having is that there are a lot of things that you cannot recall and that gives me a problem with your application insofar as full disclosure is concerned because I find it difficult to say to what extent was your role in this whole episode. For instance if you mention certain people by name and then you come now and say to us that you cannot recall or you're not sure that those people were there and yet you have mentioned them by name in your application.

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, that's correct, it would also make it much easier for myself if my memory was of such a nature that I could remember everything and that I could tell the Committee everything and I also then knew that it was 100%, but I'm unfortunately only human and I can forget things.

MR MALAN: Are you sure that you were there that day?

MR BOSCH: I was there, Chairperson.

MR MALAN: You're dead certain, you've got no doubt about it?

MR BOSCH: I'm dead certain.

MR MALAN: When you read your statement and specifically 9(a)(iv) on page 37 of your application, page 14 of bundle, round about the middle you say:

Can you see that?

MR BOSCH: Yes, I do.

MR MALAN: When you read this bit you read:

So somewhere in your mind you thought that you were there really early or do I understand you incorrectly, did you only read it wrong?

MR BOSCH: Yes, I read it wrongly but it felt like it was a very long day to stay there.

MR MALAN: Do you think you were there early in the morning?

MR BOSCH: Not 6 o'clock but maybe 10 or 11 o'clock.

MR MALAN: There is also evidence which will also come to the fore which says that Bhila was indeed interrogated.

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, as far as I can remember he was not interrogated, he only sat there.

MR MALAN: So when he was not being interrogated, didn't you ask anybody: "Look are we going to ask him questions or not"? What did you do?

MR BOSCH: I was not part of that investigation, the investigation into Bhila. I do not know how to explain this to you. I am the technical person on the farm, at Vlakplaas, I don't know why they sent me there.

MR MALAN: What do you mean you were the technical person?

MR BOSCH: I took the photographs, I made videos, I helped with the listening devices etc.

MR MALAN: Oh, I thought you said on the farm meaning at the shooting place.

MR BOSCH: No, Vlakplaas.

MR MALAN: Who gave the instruction then to go to the farm?

MR BOSCH: Colonel de Kock put me in the group that had to come to Durban.

MR MALAN: But the whole group who came to Durban didn't go to the farm or rather did not go to the shooting range.

MR BOSCH: We were only three white members.

MR MALAN: Were only white people members part of the group?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

MR MALAN: I ask you again, why did you go with to the shooting range? Who said you must go there? Your answer is: "The whole group went". It seems as if the whole group did not go. I repeat my question, why did you go to the shooting range?

MR BOSCH: Because McCarter told me to come with to the shooting range, he told me I had to go with them.

MR MALAN: And you never asked him why?

MR BOSCH: Not at that stage, Chairperson.

MR MALAN: What was your relationship, what was the relationship between you and him?

MR BOSCH: It was very good, a good relationship.

MR MALAN: Were you also friends?

MR BOSCH: Yes.

MR MALAN: Did you also get together socially outside of work?

MR BOSCH: Yes.

MR MALAN: And you never asked him: "McCarter, why are we here, Frank what are we doing here"?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, this is what I've been trying to say the whole day, I cannot remember when they told me, whether it was on the way to the mountain, on the mountain, back, I cannot recall.

MR MALAN: Let me just put it to you this way - maybe you've got to page through your application, please open up on page 14 of the bundle. If you look at 9(a)(iv), if you can just quickly scan that and look at what you are saying there and what you've, you've contradicted yourself in cross-examination. All you say is you cannot remember, you do not know whether it was correct, that's how you thought then, so there is very little that remains here.

I do not know what I should consider to be your version, I suppose we'll have to look at the record bit for bit. You say that not one of you were informed about what your instructions were when you went to Durban, do you stand by that?

MR BOSCH: That's how I've written this thing two years ago, that's the way I remembered it.

MR MALAN: But how do you remember it differently now?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, Mr McCarter spoke, he gave his evidence, so this is freshening my memory.

MR MALAN: So what do you remember now, what would have been your instruction then?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, I cannot remember whether I was present when Bhila was picked up. I cannot remember that at all. And that we'd transferred him into another vehicle I cannot remember that.

MR MALAN: You say Spyker and Mhieza were there, both of them?

MR BOSCH: Yes, that's the way I remember it.

MR MALAN: I do not want to know where you might be wrong, I want to know what you remember. You remember that both of them were involved?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR MALAN: And you also remember that there was a black man who was cuffed who was with you during the course of the day?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR MALAN: And now I'm turning the page, page 15, you waited there the whole day and no-one ever told you why you were there, or rather your presence?

MR BOSCH: That is correct. When I wrote this that is what I thought.

MR MALAN: Mr Bosch, I'm asking you what your thoughts are now, what do you remember now. So these are still your memories?

MR BOSCH: Yes, Mr Chairperson.

MR MALAN: And then Sergeant Aubrey Mgade, as far as you can remember he was there, is that how you remember it? Is that the way you remember it two years ago, that's how you remember it today.

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson, but I might be mistaken.

MR MALAN: Yes, surely, you can make mistakes about everything but I want to know how you recall it now, do you recall him to be there? And then as you continue when you got out of the vehicle after the puncture you had, the flat tyre, you still did not know what the plans were and what you had to do. Then you said that you suspected - now this is only after you got out of the bus, you suspected that he possibly could be killed. Is that still how you remember it?

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR MALAN: At no stage earlier on in that day did you have the suspicion that this person might be killed, is that correct? As you remember it now.

MR BOSCH: As I remember it now yes.

MR MALAN: And it wasn't strange to you that no interrogation took place?

MR BOSCH: No.

MR MALAN: And that - and I'm using your words, you had a long day, you sat there the whole day and no-one did anything and nothing happened?

MR BOSCH: That is correct.

MR MALAN: Now if you look at page 16 of the bundle, right at the bottom you say that you tried to find out what the reason was why they detained him but you were only informed that he was an ANC terrorist.

MR BOSCH: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR MALAN: Is this still the way you remember it?

MR BOSCH: That is how I remember it when I wrote it down, yes, Mr Chairperson.

MR MALAN: You don't remember it differently?

MR BOSCH: No.

MR MALAN: And then you also wrote down on page 17 what you political objective was. Why did you write about your political objective so elaborately? If you had no information where did you get all of that from? Because you are referring to your own political objectives here, a political objective linked to an act that you were involved in.

MR BOSCH: When I wrote this Chairperson, or rather I was a member of Vlakplaas, I was an anti-terrorist member and this person we killed was a terrorist.

MR MALAN: Would you now please page to 10(a), it's on page 17 of the bundle, the second sentence starts:

You wrote this too years ago, where did you get this information from two years ago?

MR BOSCH: From my memory, Chairperson.

MR MALAN: But from your memory you didn't know why the person was there. I'm trying to tell you that if you can remember anything else, as soon as it becomes clear please tell us because at this stage you are confusing me and I'm only trying to play open cards with you, I just want to see whether you might be able to help me.

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, like I'm sitting here I am as confused as you, I don't know whether it's morning or night.

MR MALAN: Thank you, Mr Bosch.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Bosch, can you explain to me why on page 5 of your handwritten application you said there was financial advantage, you got a bonus in cash?

MR BOSCH: Chairperson, this has got nothing to do with this incident, this pertained to something else.

CHAIRPERSON: Well tell me what incident it has got to do with?

MR BOSCH: I think it was an external operation, foreign operation.

CHAIRPERSON: On whose behalf?

MR BOSCH: Vlakplaas.

CHAIRPERSON: And they paid you a bonus, a cash bonus did they? Who paid it to you?

MR BOSCH: The people on the farm paid it.

CHAIRPERSON: Was that the normal practice at Vlakplaas?

MR BOSCH: No, Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Well where was this external operation?

MR BOSCH: In Lesotho, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: What was it?

MR BOSCH: It was the killing of people, a cross-border attack.

CHAIRPERSON: How many people were killed?

CHAIRPERSON: I think seven or eight, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: And when was it?

MR BOSCH: 1985/86, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: So this was before this, you'd been on cross-border killing people in Lesotho and paying bonus for it?

MR BOSCH: And a medal, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: So it wasn't your first killing this one?

MR BOSCH: That's right, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: You mustn't consult with your legal advisor while you're answering questions.

CHAIRPERSON: How many people from Vlakplaas were paid this bonus?

MR BOSCH: All the people that took part in the operation, Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Who were they?

MR BOSCH: It was Major Eugene de Kock, Willie Nortje, myself, Snor Vermeulen, Anton Adamson and security policemen from Ladybrand.

CHAIRPERSON: Have you applied for amnesty for this?

MR BOSCH: Yes, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: And have you disclosed that you received a cash bonus?

MR BOSCH: It's in this thing, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: And have the other people done the same? It's in the same application?

MR BOSCH: That's correct, Sir.

CHAIRPERSON: We can check on the other, thank you.

MR ROUSSOUW: Sorry, Mr Chairman, I don't know if there are any further questions for Mr Bosch or whether he can be excused?

MR VISSER: We'll be here at 9 o'clock, Mr Chairman.

ADV PRIOR: Mr Chairman, may we just announce it so that the public can hear.

CHAIRPERSON: We will now adjourn till 9 o'clock tomorrow morning.

ADV PRIOR: Ladies and gentlemen, please all stand.