TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION

APPLICATION NO: 6120/97

DAY: 6

______________________________________________________CHAIRPERSON: Are you ready to proceed Mr Strydom?

MR STRYDOM: Yes Chairperson, the next applicant is Sonny Michael Mkwanazi.

CHAIRPERSON: May I indicate that I have been advised by the interpreter that there is only one Zulu interpreter and that being the case we may either have to slow down or take adjournments every time and again so as to give the only interpreter present time to rest. I am informed though that another interpreter is on her way from Cape Town so once she arrives we should be able to proceed at the normal pace. Yes thank you. What is the name of this gentleman?

MR STRYDOM: Sonny Michael Mkwanazi, number seven on the list.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mkwanazi what language our you going to speak?

MR MKWANAZI: Sesotho.

CHAIRPERSON: Very well, would you state your full names for the record?

SONNY MICHAEL MKWANAZI: (sworn states)

EXAMINATION BY MR STRYDOM: Mr Mkwanazi, what is your level of education?

MR MKWANAZI: Standard 5.

MR STRYDOM: How old are you presently?

MR MKWANAZI: I am 23 years old.

MR STRYDOM: Which year were you born?

MR MKWANAZI: 1977, it was in February.

MR STRYDOM: You have signed a so-called Form 1?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Your signature appears on page 133, do you identify your signature?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes I can see the signature.

MR STRYDOM: Do you confirm the contents of the application form, Form 1?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: You've indicated now that you were born during 1977, I see in this form your birth date is given as 11th February 1976, can you just make that clear?

MR MKWANAZI: I have just applied for an identity document in 1997 and I only learnt then that I was born in February 1977.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mkwanazi, would you please speak up so that people at the back of the hall can hear what you are saying, do you understand?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes very well. I have just taken in a new identity document, it was in 1997 when I applied. It is then that I only came to know that I was born in 1977 in February.

MR STRYDOM: And next to your application form is a typed out document setting out inter alia the political objective you wanted to achieve with the attack. Now this document was translated to you and shown to you. Do you confirm the contents of this document?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes that is correct but I must say we did not have an interpreter on that day.

MR STRYDOM: Yes but I'm referring today this contents have been explained yet again, do you confirm the contents?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: In your own words, what was your motive and objectives when you decided to go along with the group that attacked Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: The objective was to go to Boipatong and teach the people of Boipatong a lesson. They didn't want us to live in the township. I wanted to teach them a lesson.

MR STRYDOM: Before you moved to Kwamadala Hostel were you a victim of violence against yourself personally?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: And according to your application you moved into the hostel during 1991, is that right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Did you become a member of the Inkatha Freedom Party?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Now the next document I want to refer you to appears on page 136 of the bundle, that is the request for further particulars and your answers appear on page 138 to 140. Do you confirm that the questions and answers were again shown to you?

MR MKWANAZI: I confirm.

MR STRYDOM: You indicated that there's a wrong answer, is that right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: And you indicated to me, well I'll read you the question, you give the answer that should be given, that's question 5.2:

The answer that appears on page 139 under 5.2 is "Yes"

Do you stand by that answer?

MR MKWANAZI: No I don't stand by that answer.

MR STRYDOM: What should that answer be?

MR MKWANAZI: I said he might have said that but not in my presence. I had not arrived at the meeting.

MR STRYDOM: Can you give or tender any explanation why the answer was given as "yes"?

CHAIRPERSON: Well isn't it what he's saying that what he said was that he might have said that but not in his presence?

MR STRYDOM: That is his answer today but I just want to give him the opportunity to explain why the wrong answer appeared on the application initially.

MR MKWANAZI: My advocate was with me during that occasion, he must have mistaken me for a wrong answer. On that day I said to him he might have said that but I had not arrived at the meeting yet. The mistake comes from his side.

MR STRYDOM: Do you remember if an interpreter was used?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: Would you speak a little bit of Afrikaans?

MR MKWANAZI: No that much.

MR LAX: Sorry Mr Strydom, does he know that there wasn't an interpreter or he does not remember, I'm not quite clear what his answer is?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR LAX: No to what? Was there an interpreter or that you just don't remember?

MR MKWANAZI: There was no interpreter.

MR LAX: Thank you.

MR STRYDOM: When your statement was taken were you in custody at that time?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Now the next document I want to show you is an affidavit which appears on page 141 up to page 143. Now this document has been shown to you again and interpreted to you and you indicated that there are certain aspects that are not completely correct. The one paragraph I want to read out to you is on page 142, the second paragraph which I will translate:

Is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: When was the first time for you to become aware that Boipatong would be attacked?

MR MKWANAZI: It was on the 10th at the meeting.

MR STRYDOM: Who spoke during the meeting of the 10th you refer to?

MR MKWANAZI: It was Mr Mkhize.

MR STRYDOM: Do you remember what he said during the meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: Can you just repeat what you remember?

MR MKWANAZI: He said we should get ready for an attack but he did not tell us as to when will the attack take place. They said we should go and revenge against the people of Boipatong who did not want us in the township, the people of Boipatong who killed us when we went into the township.

MR STRYDOM: So if I can refer you to page 142 again, is that statement then correct, the one I translated to you?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mkwanazi, the statement that your counsel has just read to you says that before the night of the 17th June 1992 you did not know or you were not aware of any attack that was going to take place, do you understand that?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes I do.

CHAIRPERSON: You've just told us now that you first became aware of the attack, of the pending attack on Boipatong on the 10th June 1992? You see, do you understand that?

MR MKWANAZI: I understand.

CHAIRPERSON: So the statement that appears at page 142 cannot be correct can it?

MR MKWANAZI: What I know is that we were told to prepare ourselves for an attack. We were not told the date of the attack.

CHAIRPERSON: And you knew what place you were going to attack didn't you?

MR MKWANAZI: We did not know.

MR STRYDOM: The other paragraph you pointed out to me relates to the request for further particulars and the answer given there. I'm going to translate this paragraph and you must tell me what you say is incorrect:

Are you happy with that paragraph?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: To which extent are you not happy with that paragraph?

MR MKWANAZI: It is that issue of bloodstained clothes, nobody gave such an order. Damara, Xongo and Metjie Mkhize ordered us to burn the videos to do away with the evidence.

MR STRYDOM: Are you also known as or your nickname during that period as Stickenau?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Is that a nickname for a person that walks with a limp?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know a policeman by the name of Peens?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know a person by the name of Andries Nosenga also known as Matanzima.

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Where do you know him from?

MR MKWANAZI: I know him from Madala Hostel.

MR STRYDOM: You've heard the allegations that's been put to the other witnesses which basically boils down to the fact that he came to the hostel before the attack. What do you say about that?

MR MKWANAZI: That is not correct.

MR STRYDOM: He also made a reference to a meeting that took place before the attack where Themba Khoza and Peens addressed the hostel dwellers. Do you have any knowledge of that?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: In Mr Nosenga's affidavit it's also stated that on the night of the attack Casspir vehicles picked up various residents of the hostel including a person by the name of Lucky and he stated that he was limping. Now if one accepts that reference to that Lucky, his reference to you, what do you say about these allegations?

MR MKWANAZI: There were no police vehicles on that day. We walked to Boipatong. When we were next to an open space we stopped, split in two groups and went into the township. I did not see police vehicles on that day.

MR STRYDOM: During the course of the attack or shortly thereafter did you see any military vehicles?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes, after the attack I saw two military vehicles and they wanted to stop us entering into Kwamadala Hostel. Themba Mabote shot in their direction and they drove off taking the direction leading to Sebokeng.

MR STRYDOM: Was that the only defence force or police vehicles you saw during the course of the attack or shortly thereafter if I could put it that way?

MR MKWANAZI: I saw them approaching from Vanderbijlpark.

MR STRYDOM: But when was that?

MR MKWANAZI: When we were coming out of Boipatong.

MR STRYDOM: Now you indicated in your application that you were in Damara's group and you did explain briefly what did you do in Boipatong which places did you go to and what did you do inside Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: We were breaking windows and others were getting into the houses, opening the doors. I smashed the windows in Boipatong.

MR STRYDOM: Did you injure or kill any person in Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: Could you see that any person was injured or killed by some other of your co-attackers?

MR MKWANAZI: I could not see anything on that day but because of the shots that were fired there's a possibility that people might have been killed or injured and the next day it was reported that the people were killed in Boipatong and it was alleged that they were killed by the people from Kwamadala.

MR STRYDOM: Apart from breaking windows did you go into houses yourself?

MR MKWANAZI: There is this one house that I got into and I took a video away but there were no people in the house, they had run away already.

MR STRYDOM: And is that video you returned to the Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Why did you take the video?

MR MKWANAZI: I took this video to sell it in Kwamadala, we were starving. I did not even have clothes to wear. When I arrived at Kwamadala I only had the clothes that were on my person only so I wanted to sell this video so that I can buy clothes and buy food.

MR STRYDOM: Your parents, where did they stay during the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: They stayed in Sebokeng.

ADV. DE JAGER: Could you return to your parental home?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: Why not?

MR MKWANAZI: There was a group of comrades who accosted me, they assaulted me and they told me to tell them where my friend was. They claimed that we were members of IFP. I managed though to escape from them and a certain friend of mine called Mapondo advised me to go to Kwamadala Hostel, I did not know Kwamadala Hostel then. I agreed, we went together. He told us that there was accommodation at Kwamadala Hostel and we could stay there. The comrades had killed Tompie Vilakazi who was my friend. They chopped him with ...[indistinct] and pangas, I got very scared and I retreated to the hostel.

CHAIRPERSON: Do you know why the comrades accused you of being a member of the IFP?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes. A certain boy who was a scholar at Lekwashando was killed, his name Lata so he was killed by my friends. I was not present in that group now when they were searching for my friends they came to me but I told them that I did not know their whereabouts. They then left with me, assaulted me with shamboks, I managed to escape to the police station, I met Mapondo, he advised me to go with him to Kwamadala Hostel. He told me that there was accommodation and we would be safe and then we moved.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes I understand, I know that you were advised by Mapondo to go to hostel but what I want to find out is do you know, I mean apart from the fact that Lita Shando was killed there. Do you know why the comrades accused you of being a member of the IFP?

MR MKWANAZI: I really do not know, I do not know why they accused me.

MR STRYDOM: Apart from the fact that you could not return to Sebokeng, just prior to the attack could you move freely in the township Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: No we could not move free anywhere, not only Boipatong, Sebokeng included, Sharpeville and Boepalong.

MR STRYDOM: Did you know a person by the name of Victor Kezwa?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Were you a member of any hit squad?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: During the period before the attack were you aware of Victor Kezwa's activities?

MR MKWANAZI: I only heard of them.

MR STRYDOM: When you got to Kwamadala Hostel did you become a member of the Youth Brigade?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Did you rape any person whilst you were in Boipatong during the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: Now an allegation was made during the trial of this Boipatong Massacre case, that the allegation was made by one of the state witnesses that you bragged afterwards that you have raped a woman. The witness also testified that he did not believe you and he thought that it was - you were just saying that to boost yourself but what do you say about the allegation that you said so?

MR MKWANAZI: This is a blatant lie. The situation was very tense in Boipatong. There was gunfire. People were screaming. There was no such act that could have taken place, an act of raping, the situation was just tense for such an action to happen, it was gunfire, people were screaming. One would never take such an action.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know Prince Vanala Zulu?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Did you see him during the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: If he was there just before and during the attack would you have seen him?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: At that time did you know where he was?

MR MKWANAZI: I know he was at home. I'm referring to Natal.

MR STRYDOM: I've got no further questions, thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes thank you. Yes Ms Pretorius?

EXAMINATION BY MS PRETORIUS: Thank you Mr Chairman. At this stage when this attack took place you were only 17 years old, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: I was thirteen years old.

MS PRETORIUS: Do you know how Victor Kezwa died?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MS PRETORIUS: Why did you have only the clothes you were wearing when you went to Kwamadala Hostel, what was the reason for that?

MR MKWANAZI: It's because I ran away from the township, I could not go back to fetch my clothes. Had I gone to Sharpeville, who knows, I would have been killed and my parents could not even bring me clothes because they were always being threatened.

MS PRETORIUS: I've no further questions, thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes Mr da Silva?

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DA SILVA: May it please you Mr Chairman.

Mr Mkwanazi, you testified that you saw two military vehicles. Could you explain where you were when you saw these vehicles? You say you saw them after the attack. Can you explain more or less where you were after the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: We were retreating from Boipatong, we were at an open space. Now these vehicles approached from the Vanderbijlpark direction. Themba Mabote shot at these vehicles, they drove off leading to Sebokeng.

MR DA SILVA: So do I understand your evidence that you were in an open veld between Boipatong and Frikkie Meyer Boulevard, that's the road that leads between Sebokeng and Vanderbijlpark?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: Now when you saw this vehicles, let me just clarify this, there's a road Noble Boulevard that is between Boipatong and the factories. Did you see these vehicles any stage on Noble Boulevard or did you see them only on the road which is between Kwamadala Hostel and Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: I saw them in the main road.

MR DA SILVA: Now when you saw them were they in the vicinity of the robots?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: When you saw them the first time is that where you saw them, in the vicinity of the robot?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: And you say Mr Mabote shot at them and then they moved off in the direction of Sebokeng, in other words in a northerly direction?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: Now if you saw them the first time in the vicinity of the robots, what makes you believe that they came from Vanderbijlpark? Is that not an assumption you're making?

MR MKWANAZI: No, I saw them approaching from Vanderbijlpark and they wanted to stop us. Themba Mabote shot at them, they moved from where they were parked, that is close to the robots and they headed for Sebokeng.

MR DA SILVA: But if you saw them the first time in the vicinity of the robots, what makes you believe that they came from Vanderbijlpark, in other words from a southern direction?

CHAIRPERSON: He said in his evidence that when he saw they were approaching from the Vanderbijlpark direction, is that not what he's saying?

MR DA SILVA: Mr Chairman I ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Unless there's something that I've missed here.

MR DA SILVA: Mr Chairman I asked him specifically this to try and establish why he says they came from the Vanderbijlpark area and I asked him specifically where did he see them the first time. He says he saw them at the robots. That is not from the Vanderbijlpark direction, Mr Chairman, this is why I'm trying to follow this up to try and clarify this. Is your evidence, I understood your evidence to be that you saw them in the vicinity of the robots the first time?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: My instructions are that they never came from Vanderbijlpark. Is it possible that you made an assumption that they came from the Vanderbijlpark direction?

MR MKWANAZI: There are two streets. There's a four way stop in the middle, cars approach from Vanderbijlpark in the northerly direction, that's why I'm certain that they were approaching from Vanderbijlpark heading towards the north.

MR DA SILVA: Why do you say you're certain they were coming from Vanderbijlpark?

MR MKWANAZI: I saw them on the left side of the road from Vanderbijlpark.

MR DA SILVA: But could it not be that they just parked there, it doesn't mean that they're in actual fact travelling from Vanderbijlpark?

MR MKWANAZI: I saw them approaching from Vanderbijlpark, they were not parking. They then turned towards our direction, they lit us, Themba Mabote shot at them and they drove off.

MR DA SILVA: Now if I remember Mr Mazibuko's evidence correctly, his evidence was that Themba Mabote shot several times at them. Is that your recollection?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: Now there were several witnesses that testified during the trial, a Mr Holi Bajosi and a Mr Malloy. Do you remember them testifying during the criminal trial?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: These vehicles that you saw can you describe them?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes, brown in colour and these are small cars but topless because the people could protrude from within.

MR DA SILVA: So it's your evidence that both of them were brown and both vehicles didn't have a roof?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct, they were open at the top.

MR DA SILVA: Mr Mazibuko referred to these vehicles as suitcases, do you also know them as suitcases?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: So you're quite certain you saw two vehicles which you know as suitcases?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR DA SILVA: Now to return to Mr Bajosi's evidence and Mr Malloy's evidence and one of your co-applicant's evidence, Mr Magubane, he says he saw one vehicle. Isn't it that you could be mistaken that there was only one vehicle?

MR MKWANAZI: No I saw two cars.

MR DA SILVA: Is it - you can't give an explanation why Mr Magubane only saw one?

MR MKWANAZI: Magubane one, I saw two. It might happen that he saw one car, one vehicle, but I saw two.

MR DA SILVA: I just want to put my instructions to you, my instructions are that there was only one vehicle and that vehicle came in the direction of Sebokeng. Do you have any comment in that regard?

MR MKWANAZI: It was from Vanderbijlpark's direction.

MR DA SILVA: Do you have any comment in regard to there only being one vehicle?

MR MKWANAZI: I saw two vehicles on that day.

MR DA SILVA: I have no further questions Mr Chair.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes Ms Tanzer?

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS TANZER: Have you been sitting in these proceedings listening to the hearing since the beginning?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MS TANZER: You have heard what I have put to your co-applicant so far regarding Mr Nosenga's statements?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MS TANZER: So in order to prevent any protracted questioning, I'm going to just simply put to you as you are well aware Mr Nosenga's version are the events that led up to the Boipatong attack, the meetings that took place and the fact that there was police assistance during the attack on the night of the 17th June. What are your comments in this regard?

MR MKWANAZI: That is not correct, there were no police vehicles assisting, I did not see the police vehicles. It was only our group, our members, in Boipatong. There were no police vehicles.

MS TANZER: So in fact Mr Nosenga's version is incorrect in your opinion?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MS TANZER: When were you arrested?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember the month but it was not on the 18th or the 19th, it was quite sometime thereafter, three or four months thereafter.

MS TANZER: When do you allege that Mr Nosenga joined the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: After the attack, after the attack had taken place in Boipatong.

MS TANZER: Can you be a little more specific? One week, one month?

MR MKWANAZI: It might be a month or two after the attack.

MS TANZER: Did you know Mr Nosenga personally?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MS TANZER: Did you ever have any conversations with him?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MS TANZER: And during these conversations was the attack ever discussed?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MS TANZER: Did he ever ask you questions about the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MS TANZER: Did he ask you about your participation in the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MS TANZER: So how can you explain why Mr Nosenga has such detailed knowledge about events leading up to the attack and the attack itself?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not know, he might have heard of the activities from the newspapers because this was a very famous news story. He might have read it from the newspapers, he might have seen it from the television, this was known world wide.

MS TANZER: I put it to you that Mr Nosenga has no education and cannot read a newspaper and he had no access to televisions in the hostel as I understand from your evidence or the evidence of your co-applicants?

CHAIRPERSON: Well I'm not too sure whether this witness said that there was no television in the hostel at all. Were there televisions in the hostels?

MR MKWANAZI: There was no television in the hostel.

CHAIRPERSON: In the entire hostel no one had a television?

MR MKWANAZI: In our room we did not have a television.

CHAIRPERSON: What about the other rooms?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes there were televisions in other rooms.

CHAIRPERSON: That was prior to the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MS TANZER: Did you see no police vehicles in and around Boipatong during the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MS TANZER: Now in your evidence you said that you were advised you could stay in the hostel. What were the conditions imposed upon you for joining the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: It was expected of me to be a member of the IFP as I've run away from the township, afraid of the attacks from the comrades.

MS TANZER: And being a member of the IFP what was asked of you in the hostel, what were your duties as a member?

MR MKWANAZI: There were no duties assigned to me, I was just an inhabitant of the hostel.

CHAIRPERSON: Once at the hostel were you employed?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MS TANZER: You mentioned a meeting after the attack that you came late to while Themba Khosa was addressing this meeting. How long would you say this meeting took place?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not know how long the meeting took place.

MS TANZER: Approximately?

MR MKWANAZI: It might have been an hour or thirty minutes.

MS TANZER: Now you gave evidence that you heard nothing about the burning of the loot by the time you arrived at this meeting? What was he talking about?

MR MKWANAZI: He was telling us to co-operate with the police because they are investigating the Boipatong issue.

MS TANZER: For a whole hour?

MR MKWANAZI: There are other things as well. He said we should not fight back because the people of the hostel were angry, they wanted to fight the police. He told us to come down and give our co-operation.

MS TANZER: Was Themba Khosa angry at this meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: No he wasn't.

MS TANZER: Well how was his attitude towards the hostel dwellers having just attacked Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: He was very sad, he asked us what happened but nobody told him the truth.

MS TANZER: So at this meeting he was basically giving over the chair to the audience asking who could offer information, is that what you're saying?

MR MKWANAZI: He asked that question but nobody responded to it.

MS TANZER: You said you weren't employed at the hostel, how were you maintained?

MR MKWANAZI: Red Cross supplied us with food parcels. Often times the people of Kwamadala would gather some money so that we can buy food.

MS TANZER: Where did you get the money from?

MR MKWANAZI: The elderly men at Kwamadala would gather some money and buy us food.

MS TANZER: Did you ever break into shops or steal money or food in order to maintain yourself?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MS TANZER: Did you have a choice in participating in this attack?

MR MKWANAZI: I did not have a choice. I really did not have a choice. We were told to attack, before that we were told to take white headbands, all men were told to go, only women were supposed to stay behind. There was nothing I could do.

MS TANZER: Well what age were you considered a man?

CHAIRPERSON: Ma'am, I'm not too sure what's the relevance of these questions, is there an issue about whether this applicant take part in the attack?

MS TANZER: I didn't get the question Mr Chairman?

CHAIRPERSON: As there an issue as to whether this man took part in the attack?

MS TANZER: No there isn't Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Then why are we asking these questions?

MS TANZER: You're right Mr Chairman.

During the attack did you leave yourself with anybody or did you make sure that you were standing next to a person with a weapon, a firearm?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MS TANZER: And who was your accomplice, who were you with all the time?

MR MKWANAZI: That is Damara, Damara Xongo.

MS TANZER: Alright my final question is, I put to you that I understand you have denied allegations of Mr Nosenga. He places you in a Casspir on the night of the attack, taking you to Boipatong. This is his statement and this is the evidence he is going to be giving. What is your comment?

MR MKWANAZI: That is not correct, that is a blatant lie from Nosenga's side. Nothing of that sort happened. We walked to Boipatong and walked back.

MS TANZER: Well I put it to you that you are lying and that Mr Nosenga is being open with this Committee.

MR MKWANAZI: I do not know anything of what he said. I am telling the truth today. We were on foot to Boipatong, on foot back from Boipatong, no police casspirs, no police vehicles.

MS TANZER: I have no further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Are you also known as Lucky?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: We will be - I beg your pardon, I should start with Mr Mapoma. Do you have any questions Mr Mapoma?

MR MAPOMA: No Chairperson, I thought if any questions I do have I may have after Mr Berger has cross-examined the witness.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes. Mr Berger?

MR BERGER: Yes?

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Berger let me warn you that we intend taking a break at 11 o'clock.

MR BERGER: Chairperson, might I ask if we take the break now instead of at 11 because in five minutes time I going to be right in the middle of a point which I wouldn't want to break.

CHAIRPERSON: We will take an adjournment now, we will come back at 11.25.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mkwanazi, let me remind you that you're still under oath to speak the truth. Yes Mr Berger?

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR BERGER: Thank you Chairperson.

Mr Mkwanazi, at the criminal trial you told the court that you first moved into the hostel on the 27th June 1992 and prior to that you were never at Kwamadala, is that correct?

SONNY MICHAEL MKWANAZI: (s.u.o.) That is correct. I was just defending myself.

MR BERGER: That was a lie?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And now, before this Amnesty Committee you admit your participation in the attack but you reduce it to an absolute minimum, correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: In other words you don't admit killing or attacking or attempting to attack any person?

MR MKWANAZI: I did attack, I went to Boipatong.

MR BERGER: Yes but in your admitted participation in the attack before this Committee, you have reduced your participation to an absolute minimum?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And you say that is not a lie?

MR MKWANAZI: I went to Boipatong to attack but it was not my intention to go there. An order was taken out that nobody should remain behind, all men must go, women must stay behind. It wasn't my intention to go and attack people in Boipatong.

MR BERGER: So you didn't want to go to Boipatong and you wouldn't have gone if there hadn't been an order?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And if you don't get amnesty then you're going to proceed with your appeal and you're going to go to the appeal court and you're going to lie about your participation in the attack, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR BERGER: So if you don't get amnesty you won't proceed with your appeal?

MR MKWANAZI: The appeal goes on, sir.

MR BERGER: Isn't it correct that depending on the circumstances you just modify your evidence accordingly?

MR MKWANAZI: That is not correct.

MR BERGER: You see I wasn't surprised this morning when you changed certain of the answers in your application and in particular I'm referring to your answer about what Themba Khosa said at the meeting of the 18th June 1992. You told the Committee that the reason that there's that wrong answer and the reason that there's that incorrect passage in your affidavit is because your advocate got it wrong, not you, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That's what I said.

MR BERGER: And the fact that you've been sitting here everyday - well let me ask you that first, is it correct that you've been present throughout these proceedings?

MR MKWANAZI: When these proceedings began this month I was not here.

MR BERGER: Yes, you were not here on the 18th January 1999.

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: But for that day you have attended every other day, every other sitting of this hearing?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And you've heard all your co-applicants with the exception of Mr Victor Mthembu denied that Themba Khosa gave the order to burn goods from the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And you knew what was contained in your amnesty application namely that you had admitted that Themba Khosa had given that instruction?

MR MKWANAZI: It might have happened that he took out such an instruction but I was not present at that time, I arrived late.

MR BERGER: You see what I'm putting to you is that the reason that you changed your application or the details, those particular details in your application, is because you want your evidence to fit in with the evidence of your co-applicant's, am I right?

MR MKWANAZI: No, you're not right.

MR BERGER: Okay, when you made your application, I'm talking about the documents at pages 131 to 133, where were you?

MR MKWANAZI: I was in prison, Leeuhof.

MR BERGER: That was on the 15th January 1998.

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And when you gave you answers which I recorded at pages 131 to 133, who was present?

MR MKWANAZI: It was two advocates.

MR BERGER: Advocate Strydom next to you and Mr Frederick next to him?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And there was no interpreter present?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And at that time were the contents of the pages 134 and 135 explained to you?

MR MKWANAZI: I did not have an interpreter but here and there I could understand what was said.

MR BERGER: Please be aware of the document that I'm referring you to, I'm referring you to page 134 and page 135. Perhaps my learned friend could show you? Was that document explained to you when you signed your amnesty application?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And then the questions at pages 136 to 137 were put to you and you gave the answers at 138 to 140?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Who was present when you were asked those questions and you gave those answers?

MR MKWANAZI: Advocate Strydom next to me.

MR BERGER: Only Advocate Strydom?

MR MKWANAZI: The two of them again.

MR BERGER: Advocate Strydom and Mr Frederick and there was no interpreter present?

MR MKWANAZI: There was no interpreter.

MR BERGER: Then the document at pages 141 to 143, that is your affidavit, that was signed by you on 11th June 1998 and the oath was taken by Mr Frederick, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And who else was present when you gave this statement?

MR MKWANAZI: We were three.

MR BERGER: You, Advocate Strydom and Mr Frederick?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And once again there was no interpreter present?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And you do not speak English or Afrikaans and you do not understand English or Afrikaans, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You spoke exclusively in Sotho?

MR MKWANAZI: Afrikaans as well, I can understand Afrikaans just bits and pieces of Afrikaans. I'm very strong in English, my English is stronger than Afrikaans.

MR BERGER: So did you not speak English to Advocate Strydom and Mr Frederick?

MR MKWANAZI: Here and there I would throw a bit of English, yes.

MR BERGER: You see because the document from 141 to 143 is quite a detailed document and it has information which is peculiar to you and to no one else. For example what is written on page 141 and on other pages, 142 and 143. So what I'm suggesting to you, Mr Mkwanazi, is that you and Advocate Strydom and Mr Frederick were able to converse quite easily for them to be able to get this statement down from you, that there was no problem with communication at all?

MR MKWANAZI: There was a linguistic problem, a communication problem. Why do I say this it's because I would mix English and Afrikaans together.

MR BERGER: Yes but there was never a time when you didn't understand what they were asking you and they didn't understand what you were saying? Isn't that right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct, here and there we would understand each other quite well.

MR BERGER: Now for example question number 6 at page 136:

MR MKWANAZI: Themba Mabote.

MR BERGER: Yes, in fact that was your answer. You said "yes, I saw people" - page 139. "I saw Themba Mabote" Accused 67 at the trial, fired shots in the streets of Boipatong, that's correct is it not?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: I also saw Damara firing shots in the direction of the shops. That is correct is it not?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: You went on:

That's correct is it not?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: I see you answered in English that time, you said "yes".

MR MKWANAZI: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: In fact you've been through all the questions and all the answers with your legal representatives, you've been through your application and you've been through the affidavit which you made at pages 141 to 143 and am I correct to say that you are satisfied with everything that is written there except the parts that you pointed out in your evidence this morning?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Everything else has been properly, faithfully and accurately recorded. Am I correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Now to come to the pertinent question, it's question 5 on page 136. You were asked:

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR BERGER: Your answer was exactly the same, yes. You answered yes in Sotho and you answered yes in English on page 139. Your answer now again is yes. 5.1:

It's not a simple question if one doesn't understand English or Afrikaans. You answer 5.1:

That is correct is it not?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

What part of that question - well in fact I beg your pardon -there's nothing in that question that you didn't understand, am I right?

MR MKWANAZI: My advocate made a mistake somewhere because I said to him if ever an order was taken out to burn bloodstained clothes I was not there. He might have said it but I was not in the meeting yet.

MR BERGER: So let's just get clarity, you understood the question perfectly well, there was no problem with understanding what the question was?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Where the dispute comes is you now say that your answer was not a simple yes, your answer was much longer than a simple yes, am I right?

MR MKWANAZI: I repeat, my answer is he might have said it but I was not in the meeting yet. The mistake arose from my advocate when he wrote this down.

MR BERGER: So you gave a long answer and your advocate recorded it as a simple yes, that's your evidence today?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: I put it to you that that answer is not the truth?

MR MKWANAZI: To me it's the truth.

MR BERGER: And you see it goes further than that, because in the statement where you were recounting what happened during the attack and after the attack, you give a full explanation and then at page 143 you say that:

Is that part correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You then go on to say:

MR MKWANAZI: That is not correct.

MR BERGER: Yes now in response to the question:

You now say that your answer was not yes, your answer was:

MR MKWANAZI: That's what I said.

MR BERGER: But your answer is not "no". Mr Mkhize and Mr Xongo gave that instruction. That's not your answer is it?

MR MKWANAZI: Mr Mkhize and Mr Damara issued out an instruction to burn the goods that were stolen from Boipatong to hide evidence.

MR BERGER: And what about the clothes stained with blood, did they say that those must also be burnt?

MR MKWANAZI: I did not hear anything to that effect.

MR BERGER: But the clothes stained with blood weren't to hide the evidence of the massacre, isn't that right?

MR MKWANAZI: The goods that were burnt included television sets, microwave ovens and video machines. These were goods stolen from Boipatong.

MR BERGER: And bloodied clothes?

MR MKWANAZI: I did not hear anything of the bloodied clothes.

MR BERGER: So where did your advocate get this sentence at page 143, that Themba Khosa said during a meeting of the attack that we must burn the bloodied clothes. Where did he get that sentence from if not from you?

MR MKWANAZI: He might have made a mistake. I explained to him as I am doing now.

MR BERGER: I put it to you Mr Mkwanazi that there was no mistake here, that this paragraph like the rest of the statement was faithfully and accurately recorded by your advocate from what you told him on the 11th June 1998.

MR MKWANAZI: What we've just discussed now is incorrect. On that day I was telling him everything I recalled.

MR BERGER: Now is it correct that at the time you were friendly with Mr Jack Mbele?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And you're still friendly with him aren't you?

MR MKWANAZI: We're still friends.

MR BERGER: You were also friendly with Mr Timothy Stalz Mazabuka?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And you're still friends?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Now you say that you were armed with a kierie is that right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: The state witness, Mr Malloy, said you were armed with a kierie, so he was correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: He said that you were in a group that were breaking windows, so he was telling the truth?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: He also said that he saw you come out of a house with other attackers and that you were carrying looted goods, so he was telling the truth?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: So he was quite an accurate witness as far as you were concerned, would you agree?

MR MKWANAZI: I agree.

MR BERGER: He also said that the following day you said that you had raped someone in Boipatong during the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: That is a blatant lie, the situation within the township was very tense. There was gunfire all over and screams of people, such an action would have never taken place. Even the members of our group were not known to each other, almost all of them because we were many, there were many of us, we would only know each other by white headbands. Such an action would have never taken place, no one would have raped on that day. I believe if you were found on the bed you would be killed mistakenly for someone who lives in that house.

MR BERGER: Firstly, why do you say the rapes were taking place on a bed?

MR MKWANAZI: I believe raping, sleeping with a woman, takes place on a bed.

MR BERGER: Mr Mkwanazi, I'm not going to debate the point with you that rape is not a sexual act, it's an act of violence, it's an act of power and it doesn't have to take place on a bed. The point is that Mr Malloy who accurately gave accurate evidence according to you about everything that you did or that he saw you doing during the attack should suddenly be mistaken about what you said a day after the attack. Can you explain that?

MR MKWANAZI: He is mistaken when it comes to the issue of rape because he did not see me raping. He says he heard it from me, I never said that, that is a blatant lie.

MR BERGER: Either you did rape during the attack or you're aware of the fact that people were raped and you in the euphoria after the attack tried to claim some credit for yourself?

MR MKWANAZI: That is not the truth.

MR BERGER: Mr Bajosi at the trial said that he saw you in Boipatong at a house on the corner of Glubie and Bafokeng Streets, would that be correct?

MR MKWANAZI: It might be true he saw me but I did not see him.

MR BERGER: Well you don't dispute that during the attack you were in the vicinity at one point in time of the corner of Glubie and Bafokeng Street?

MR MKWANAZI: I think we got into many streets. I do not even know where Glubie is, I would not dispute that.

MR BERGER: I can tell you - well you say you don't know where Glubie is, does that mean that you don't know Boipatong very well?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You didn't spend any time in Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR BERGER: You didn't have any friends or family in Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: I don't have family in Boipatong.

MR BERGER: You didn't have any reason to go to Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: I had no reason to take me to Boipatong to attack people.

MR BERGER: Now Glubie and Bafokeng, the corner of Glubie and Bafokeng is right at the top of the township, you know the streets where the factories are?

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Berger, his evidence is that he cannot dispute whether he was at that place because there were so many streets. I don't know what point would be served by telling me where the location is unless there is something to the point that you want to make.

MR BERGER: Chairperson, I want to give the witness an opportunity to at least have an idea of the area of Boipatong that I'm talking about because I want to tell him what happened at two houses near the corner of Glubie and Bafokeng Streets but I can move onto that straight away without telling him, fine.

CHAIRPERSON: No, let's hear what he has to say because I understand him he just didn't know Boipatong, nor does he know any streets there, he can't dispute, deny that he was at some of those places.

MR BERGER: That's what I'm trying to assist him with, with some idea of where it is.

Mr Mkwanazi, near the corner of the two streets where you were seen are two houses. One is 734 Bafokeng and the other is 722 Bafokeng.

CHAIRPERSON: And this is where he was seen by the state witness Bajosi?

MR BERGER: That is so, Chairperson and at 734 Bafokeng Andries Manekye and Lena Manekye were stabbed - let me be accurate, Andries Manekye was stabbed, chopped and shot. Lena Manekye was stabbed and items were stolen from the house and at 722 Bafokeng ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Let's just let him deal with the first one, with 734 first, let's get his response. Did you understand the question?

MR MKWANAZI: I understand.

MR BERGER: The question is and I'm not sure which house you were seen coming out of, that's why I wanted to mention both houses which are near the corner of the street, but in both houses items were stolen and in both houses people were killed. In other words they were there when the items were stolen because they died there. Now you say that the house you went into had been deserted? Are you not telling lies again?

MR MKWANAZI: No, there were no people inside the house, the house was deserted, the doors were open.

CHAIRPERSON: The state witness Bajosi only says he saw him in the vicinity of these two houses, 734 and 722, is that all he said?

MR BERGER: Yes, he saw him at a house on the corner of Glubie and Bafokeng Streets.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay and the houses at the corner would be either one of those two?

MR BERGER: No Chairperson, 734 is exactly on the corner of Glubie and Bafokeng and 722 is in Bafokeng across the road from the corner with Glubie and Bafokeng. It's two houses away from the corner.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes alright.

MR BERGER: You're saying you didn't go into those houses?

MR MKWANAZI: No I did not get into those houses. The house that I went into was in the middle. From the corner it might be the seventh if not the eighth house.

MR BERGER: Oh, so you do have an idea of where the house is?

MR MKWANAZI: It might happen it is the seventh or the eighth house from the corner, that's the structure of the township houses.

MR BERGER: And you can remember that today from that night?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct. I remember what happened on that day.

MR BERGER: You took a T.V. - I beg your pardon, a video recorder, because you were hoping to sell it to someone in the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You were hoping to sell it to someone who had a T.V.?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct. Someone who did not have a T.V. could have as well bought it.

MR BERGER: To do what with?

MR MKWANAZI: He would buy it and buy the T.V. set later on.

MR BERGER: How many people had T.V. sets in the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: I would not say everybody in the hostel had a television. I think according to my knowledge ten if not eleven people owned television sets within the hostel.

MR BERGER: Why did you not steal anything else, why just a video?

MR MKWANAZI: I knew that video machines are very expensive when you buy them from the shops so when selling it I would sell it at a very high price so that I can buy food and clothes.

MR BERGER: So you hoped to make a lot of money from this video machine?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And isn't it also so that you couldn't carry anything else because you were now carrying a video machine so it would have been a bit difficult to steal other stuff?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct, I wanted this video.

MR BERGER: You must have been very upset the next day when Mr Mkhize and Damara Xongo said you must burn the video machine?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Would it surprise you that - or are you surprised because you were present that Mr Mkhize doesn't tell the Committee that he gave any order to burn the goods?

MR MKWANAZI: I did not hear an order to burn the bloodstained clothes I only know an order to burn stolen goods which is microwave ovens, television sets and video machines.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mkwanazi, that is not the question you are being asked. The question is are you surprised that Mr Mkhize, when he gave evidence before this Committee, did not mention the fact that he had given orders that stolen items such as your video machine be burned?

MR MKWANAZI: It really surprised me.

MR BERGER: Where was this order given and how was it given?

MR MKWANAZI: It was after the attack. We were told that the police were outside to come and search and we were told we should burn the stolen goods to hide the evidence.

MR BERGER: Are you talking now about the day after the attack, the 18th June 1992?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Round about what time in the morning was it when this order was given?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember the time but it was day.

MR BERGER: Was it in the morning?

MR MKWANAZI: It was not in the morning it was just towards midday, round about 1 o'clock, 2 o'clock, 3 o'clock but not in the morning.

MR BERGER: And where were you when this order was given?

MR MKWANAZI: I was at the stadium.

MR BERGER: Alright, so if I understand your evidence correctly, what happened was you woke up that morning very pleased with yourself that you now had a video machine and you were going to make lots of money. The whole morning went by and nothing happened and then at some point everybody was called to the stadium, would that be right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Did the siren go off again and then everyone went to the stadium?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct. Others were just walking towards the stadium.

MR BERGER: Then everybody congregated in the stadium, it's now about midday and Mr Mkhize and Damara Xongo address the men?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Only the men, women didn't come?

MR MKWANAZI: They were not there.

MR BERGER: Why not?

MR MKWANAZI: I believe women were not needed to go to Boipatong, they were not needed as well in our meeting, it was a secret that was going to be discussed, only men were allowed, women were not allowed to hear what men were discussing.

MR BERGER: But how did the women know not to come to the stadium that morning? You see the night before we've heard when the siren went off all the women went to the stadium then they were told to go back to their rooms. Now the day after the attack the siren goes off again and yet the women don't go to the stadium?

MR MKWANAZI: I believe the siren was calling the men who went to Boipatong for an attack. Those who did not take part were not needed, I'm referring to women.

MR BERGER: And the women who didn't know what happened the night before because they were sent away from the stadium, they just knew when the siren went off the following day they're not needed again at the stadium?

MR MKWANAZI: They would not come to the stadium.

MR BERGER: And at this meeting now where Mr Mkhize and Mr Xongo addressed the residents was Themba Khosa present?

MR MKWANAZI: On the 18th he was present.

MR BERGER: And then at that meeting Mr Mkhize said all the goods which we have looted from Boipatong must now be burned, right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And Mr Themba Khosa was present when he said that, correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And then all the men went back to their rooms and fetched the goods which they had stolen from Boipatong and brought them back to the stadium where they were burned, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: They did not come with the goods to the stadium. There are these big rubbish bins on the premises of Iscor, we threw those goods into those rubbish bins and they were burned.

MR BERGER: And after the goods were burned you then went back to the stadium?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR BERGER: What did you do after the goods were burned?

MR MKWANAZI: We went to our different rooms.

MR BERGER: And the meeting was over?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: So when did Themba Khosa say you must cooperate with the police?

MR MKWANAZI: It was a day after the attack.

MR BERGER: Before you left the stadium to go and burn your goods?

MR MKWANAZI: I've got a problem.

MR BERGER: You've got a problem because the interpretation is not coming through?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR BERGER: Just for the record you're speaking English again and understanding it?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR LAX: Sorry, if you take your hand off that black box you'll be able to hear better. If you block the signal then you can't hear.

MR BERGER: I'll repeat the question Mr Mkwanazi. You see what we've established thus far is that there's this meeting in the stadium. Mkhize is there, Damara Xongo is there, Themba Khosa is there and I take it Humphrey Nglovu is also there and at this meeting and in the presence of Mr Themba Khosa, Mr Mkhize and Mr Xongo give orders that the goods stolen from Boipatong must be burned. Correct so far?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And then once those orders are given, the meeting breaks up, the men go back to their rooms, get the stolen loot, take them to the huge bins provided by Iscor and burn the loot?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And after that there's no more meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: There were subsequent meetings, after this one there were others.

MR BERGER: So would it be correct to say that at a subsequent meeting Themba Khosa told you to co-operate with the police?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: But at the meeting where Themba Khosa was present when Mkhize and Xongo said burn the goods, at that meeting Themba Khosa did not say cooperate with the police, he just kept quiet and remained there, am I right?

MR MKWANAZI: Can you repeat your question please?

MR BERGER: At the meeting of the 18th when Themba Khosa was there with Mkhize, at that meeting Themba Khosa did not say cooperate with the police, at that meeting Themba Khosa just kept quiet.

MR MKWANAZI: He said many things, some I cannot remember.

MR BERGER: So Mkhize spoke and Themba Khosa also spoke at that meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct, the two of them addressed the meeting.

MR SIBANYONI: Sorry Mr Berger. Mr Mkwanazi, on what day did Themba Khosa say you should cooperate with the police?

MR MKWANAZI: It was on the 18th.

MR SIBANYONI: When were these subsequent meetings you are talking about, were they on the same day or sometime thereafter?

MR MKWANAZI: Days thereafter.

MR SIBANYONI: Thank you Mr Berger.

MR BERGER: Thank you Mr Sibanyoni.

Mr Mkwanazi, you were asked by your counsel whether you were a victim of violence. You said yes. Do I understand it correctly from your statement at 141 that the violence you're referring to is an attack upon you in Sibokeng?

MR MKWANAZI: No, that is in Sharpeville.

MR BERGER: I just want to get your evidence accurate on the meeting of the 10th June, you remember you told the Committee this morning about a meeting you attended on the 10th June, a week before the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes I do.

MR BERGER: You said at that meeting Mr Mkhize spoke and he said "we should get ready for an attack" but no date for the attack was set, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: At that meeting on the 10th June he said, this is Mr Mkhize, he said that "we should take revenge against the people of Boipatong who killed us because they didn't want us in their township." Is that what he said?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Do you walk with a limp?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Mr Peens, you say you don't know him, you recall on Friday he was - there were two men standing at the bottom of the stage, there was one with white hair who is referred to as Rooikop and then there was another man standing next to him, darker in complexion than Rooikop, do you remember that?

MR MKWANAZI: I remember that.

MR BERGER: The darker one is Peens. Are you saying that before Friday of last week you had never seen that man before?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: If you had been in a Casspir with him on the night of the attack you would have seen him, correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct but because we were not in Casspirs I did not see him.

MR BERGER: How do you know that Mr Nosenga was not in the hostel before the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: I believe I knew every member of Kwamadala Hostel who came from the township, there were not many of us. I knew them, well except those who come from the homelands, there were many in number, I did not know some of them but some of them I did know. On that day I did not see him.

MR BERGER: So when did Mr Nosenga come to the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: After the attack.

MR BERGER: The attack was on the 17th June, when did Mr Nosenga come to the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: It might be somewhere around August.

MR BERGER: And you were arrested when?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember the month.

MR BERGER: Approximately?

MR MKWANAZI: It might be two months, three months even four months after the incident, it was quite some time before I was arrested.

MR BERGER: Besides the meeting you have spoken about on the 10th June as well as the meeting in the stadium on the 17th June immediately before the attack are you saying there were no other meetings at the hostel prior to the attack where an attack or a possible attack was discussed?

MR MKWANAZI: There were meetings before the attack, yes there were meetings.

MR BERGER: But you never attended any?

MR MKWANAZI: Some of the meetings I did attend and some not.

MR BERGER: Did you attend a meeting on the Sunday before the attack, that's the 14th June?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And Mr Themba Khosa addressed that meeting as well, is that right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And he said at that meeting if people come and attack you, you are supposed to fight back and kill them?

MR MKWANAZI: I did not hear that part but I do know that the people from Boipatong wanted to come to the hostel to attack us. The police stopped that because when we heard of a possible attack from the township we went out and we met at the police at the robots. They stopped us, we went back.

MR BERGER: You are talking about an incident which took place after the attack, am I right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: I am talking about a meeting on the Sunday before the attack, the one where Themba Khosa was also present, about three days before the attack. What did Themba Khosa say at that meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember what Themba Khosa said but he was addressing the meeting though.

MR BERGER: What about the meeting two weeks before the attack on the 3rd June 1992, did you attend that meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember the date but I was attending the meetings. No I do not remember the dates, I did attend some meetings.

MR BERGER: I'm talking now about two weeks before the attack. At that meeting Themba Khosa was also present, am I correct?

MR MKWANAZI: I remember the meeting that was held on the 10th, this is the meeting I attended and I still remember.

MR BERGER: So you don't remember what happened at the meeting of the 3rd June 1992?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember.

MR BERGER: And so you wouldn't be able to dispute whether Themba Khosa was present at that meeting as well?

MR MKWANAZI: I would not dispute that.

MR BERGER: You were not employed whilst living in the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Were any of your friends employed whilst living in the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR BERGER: Did you know Jabogo Magubane?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You were friendly with him before the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: In fact you were all part of the same circle, you Jabogo, Timothy, Dondo?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes we all stayed in one room.

MR BERGER: And you never went out stealing to get money and to get stuff to survive?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR BERGER: The two army vehicles that you saw driving along the main road from the direction of Vanderbijlpark, remember?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR BERGER: You say at some point along that main road they turned to face your group as you were congregating in the veld outside Boipatong, this is now after the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR BERGER: And they shone their lights on y our group?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: How did they try to stop you from crossing the road or whatever?

MR BERGER: The cars parked exactly where we were supposed to cross. Themba Mabote then shot at them and they moved through the point where we were supposed to cross and we managed then to cross to Kwamadala Hostel.

MR BERGER: So the only thing that the soldiers did you stop you was to park in front of you, face you and shine their lights at you?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: How many shots did Themba Mabote fire at the soldiers?

MR MKWANAZI: Many times.

MR BERGER: Approximately?

MR MKWANAZI: It was a series of gunfire, I would not be in a position to count or estimate as to how many times he shot. What I remember he had an AK47 rifle in his possession.

MR BERGER: So he fired an AK47 at the military vehicles?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct. I do not know whether he hit them or the bullets just went - just passed by but he was shooting in their direction.

MR BERGER: And was he the only member of the attackers who shot at the military?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not know whether he was the only one who shot but as I've said there was a series of gunfire.

MR BERGER: He was the only one you saw shooting?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You didn't see anyone else shooting?

MR MKWANAZI: Except in the township, inside the township I saw Damara and Mkhize shooting.

MR BERGER: Yes, now I'm talking about at that point in time in the veld outside Boipatong. You didn't see anyone other than Themba Mabote shooting at the military?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And the military vehicles then turned to face Sebokeng and drove away?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: They didn't stop at the robots?

MR MKWANAZI: They were stopping at the robots. The other one was in the front, the other ...[indistinct] and they drove in a convoy to Sebokeng.

MR BERGER: As you were crossing the road they drove beyond the robots towards Sebokeng?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And so then it was easy for you to return to the hostel because there were no soldiers in your way and you re-entered through the main gate?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You say it's not correct that Casspirs transported some of the attackers to Boipatong and assisted with transporting the loot from Boipatong back to Kwamadala, that is not correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Were you a friend of Victor ...[indistinct]

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR BERGER: But you know he was called the Vaal Monster?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Prince Vanana Zulu, he was the most senior IFP leader in the hostel, would you agree with that?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: His word was law in the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: He was the leader of the Indunas.

MR BERGER: Nothing happened in the hostel without his permission, am I right?

MR MKWANAZI: There were many leaders in Kwamadala Hostel.

MR BERGER: Was Prince Vanana Zulu the most important leader at Kwamadala Hostel, yes or no?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes he was most honoured.

MR BERGER: And if he said something should happen then it happened, correct?

MR MKWANAZI: He used to address meetings of the elderly people and there was also a separate meeting of the youth. Mr Buthelezi conducted the meetings that included the youth. He chaired the meetings of the elderly people.

MR BERGER: I'm asking you a simple question, if Mtwana Zulu said that something should happen, he gave an order in the hostel, that order was carried out, am I right?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: If he gave an order and said something should not happen, that order was obeyed and it did not happen.

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Prior to June 1992 when was the last time that Prince Vanana Zulu had gone home on leave?

MR MKWANAZI: I only noticed that he was not present within the hostel, it was after the attack when I saw him getting out of a taxi. When did he come back from KwaZulu Natal, I do not know.

MR BERGER: When was the time before this that Prince Vanana Zulu had taken leave, do you know?

CHAIRPERSON: Do you know when Mr Zulu went to KwaZulu Natal prior to the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR BERGER: So how do you know that Prince Vanana Zulu was not present in the hostel on the day of the attack?

MR MKWANAZI: I believe I would have seen him in all the meetings of Kwamadala. His house was located next to the gate. One would have seen him because that was the gate that we used for exit and entrance.

MR BERGER: And if someone were to say that Prince Vanana Zulu was in Boipatong at the time of the attack would you say that that is not correct or would you say it's possible but you never saw him?

MR MKWANAZI: I dispute that. Had he been around Boipatong I would have seen him, I would have seen him again at the meeting.

MR BERGER: Thank you Mr Mkwanazi, I have no further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Malindi?

MR MALINDI: Thank you Chairperson I have no questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Ms Cambanis?

MS CAMBANIS: No questions thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mapoma?

MR MAPOMA: No questions Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Any re-examination?

RE-EXAMINATION BY MR STRYDOM: Thank you Chairperson.

How often did Mr Themba Khosa come to meetings at the hostel?

CHAIRPERSON: Do you want him to tell us the exact number of times that Themba Khosa came to the meeting?

MR STRYDOM: Not exact, I want an estimate of how regularly did Mr Themba Khosa come to the hostel to address meetings.

CHAIRPERSON: Then put that question.

MR STRYDOM: Yes the question is how regularly did Themba Khosa come to the hostel to address the people?

MR MKWANAZI: Mr Khosa used to come regularly to the meetings.

MR STRYDOM: Before the attack on Boipatong do remember when was the last occasion when Mr Khosa came to the hostel to address the people?

MR MKWANAZI: Can you please repeat your question?

MR STRYDOM: Before the attack I want to know if you can remember the last occasion before the attack Mr Khosa came to the hostel to address the residents?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember when it was, I do not know the date.

MR STRYDOM: Can you give any estimate whether it was weeks, days or months before that?

MR MKWANAZI: It might be a month before.

MR STRYDOM: At any meeting which you attended did you see Mr Khosa together with the person that stood there, Mr Peens, on Friday that he stood there?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: Mr Chairperson just bear with me, I'm just taking an instruction? I've got no further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Ms Pretorius?

MS PRETORIUS: I have no further questions thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr da Silva?

FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DA SILVA: May it please you Mr Chairman.

Mr Mkwanazi, you testified that Mr Mabote had an AK47 in his possession and he fired this AK47 at the military vehicles. You say there was a series of gunfire. Is it your recollection that Mr Mabote was shooting single shots or was the AK47 semi-automatic?

MR MKWANAZI: He was shooting on automatic.

MR DA SILVA: And while he was shooting on automatic were there several bursts of fire at the military vehicles or was it a single burst of fire?

MR MKWANAZI: An automatic will shoot many times.

MR DA SILVA: But if you think back of the incident was there a burst of fire and then a pause and then another burst of fire? Was this what happened on several occasions or was there just one continuous burst of fire?

MR MKWANAZI: The gun was on automatic.

MR DA SILVA: And he was just shooting in the direction of the military vehicle?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: Can you recall more or less what time in the evening this incident took place?

MR MKWANAZI: I would not remember the time sir.

MR DA SILVA: Now I understand your evidence to be that the vehicles parked directly opposite the steel footbridge that leads to the main road where the group eventually crossed, is that correct?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct, that's where we were supposed to cross, that's a small bridge.

MR DA SILVA: My instructions are that the military vehicle that was there in Frikkie Meyer Boulevard never stopped opposite the footbridge. Do you have any comment?

MR MKWANAZI: The vehicles that I saw on the 17th June stopped at that bridge, that's when Themba Mabote shot in their direction. They were removed from our way and they drove off to the direction of Sebokeng. We managed then to cross the bridge.

MR DA SILVA: Now Mr Timothy Stalz Mazibuku you say moved in the same circle as what you did. What I want to know, did he form part of that group that crossed that bridge when the military vehicles were there, was he part of the same group?

MR MKWANAZI: I would say yes. Remember we had split into groups now some people were still coming to join the group, some were right behind.

MR DA SILVA: I would state to you that he was part of the same group because his evidence was that he was standing next to Mr Mabote when he fired the firearm. Would you dispute that?

MR MKWANAZI: I would not dispute that, I would not confirm that, we were many. I did not go there to inspect as to who was standing next to who.

MR DA SILVA: Why I'm asking you this question, Mr Mkwanazi, is that Mr Mazibuku's recollection of the events is different from yours. He says that this vehicles or the vehicles approached close to the group and they were about thirty metres away and then they turned around and drove away, that they did not come from Vanderbijlpark and stop at the bridge. I don't understand his evidence to be that. Do you have any comment in that regard?

MR MKWANAZI: It might have been that he was right at the back but I still say I saw the vehicles that approached from Vanderbijlpark.

MR DA SILVA: Now your evidence is that these vehicles drove away in the direction of Sebokeng. If I put it to you that these vehicles drove to the gate of the hostel and at later stages fired canisters of gas into the marsh, you won't be able to dispute that would you?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct, I would not dispute that. When they arrived we were already inside Kwamadala.

MR DA SILVA: I don't have further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you sir.

MS PRETORIUS: No re-examination.

CHAIRPERSON: Did I ask you Mr Mapoma if you had any questions?

MR MAPOMA: ...[inaudible]

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Sibanyoni?

MR SIBANYONI: Thank you Mr Chairperson.

Mr Mkwanazi, you say Prince Vanana Zulu was not at the hostel because if he was there you would have seen him during the meetings. My question is if he was there and he didn't attend the meeting can you still dispute that he was not there?

MR MKWANAZI: There would never be a meeting in his absence. He was a respectable man and he would attend meetings of elderly people and address them. He would be there.

MR SIBANYONI: Now we understand all men were called to the hostel. Are you in a position to say everyone attended the meeting of the 17th at the stadium?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR SIBANYONI: Was Mkambalani Buthelezi also at the meeting of the 17th at the stadium?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember. Mkambalani Buthelezi was a sickly person, I don't know whether he was suffering from T.B. or he had ulcers but he was sick. He was the leader of the Youth Brigade. Now he at times would not attend our meetings. Instead Thembu would chair all these meetings. As I said he was a sickly person.

MR SIBANYONI: You can't say whether or not he was there, you can't vow and say definitely he was not at the meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: I did not see him on the 17th, I do not have certainty as to whether he was there.

MR SIBANYONI: As we are told that there are many people staying at the hostel is it possible that maybe Nosenga was also there but because of the fact that there were many people it was possible that you could not have identified him or saw him?

MR MKWANAZI: I mentioned earlier on that I knew all the people who came from the township, we were not many.

MR SIBANYONI: How many men stayed at the hostel during June 1992, approximately?

MR MKWANAZI: Between 300 and 400, this was a massive hostel.

MR SIBANYONI: And you knew each and everyone of those people?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR SIBANYONI: Thank you Mr Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Advocate Sigodi?

ADV SIGODI: On the day after the attack when you were told that you must burn the goods, were the police present at the hostel?

MR MKWANAZI: On the 18th?

ADV SIGODI: Yes.

MR MKWANAZI: There were policemen but they were not allowed to get into the hostel they were outside.

ADV SIGODI: In other words they couldn't have heard the instruction to burn the goods, is that what you are saying?

MR MKWANAZI: They did not hear that.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes Mr Lax?

MR LAX: Thank you Chairperson.

You said that you couldn't say whether Themba Khosa had said anything about destroying evidence because you came late to a meeting. Do you remember that?

MR MKWANAZI: I remember.

MR LAX: Which meeting did you come late to?

MR MKWANAZI: It is the meeting of the 18th June.

MR LAX: When you came into the meeting was he already talking?

MR MKWANAZI: Correct.

MR LAX: And who spoke after him?

MR MKWANAZI: It was Mr Mkhize.

MR LAX: So after he had told you to cooperate with the police Mkhize then said you must burn all these items?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR LAX: And he was present when that was said?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR LAX: Now what was the meeting on the Sunday about?

MR MKWANAZI: Give me the date for that Sunday please?

MR LAX: The attack was on the Wednesday which was the 17th so the Sunday would be the 14th and in reply to Mr Berger's questions you indicated you were present at that meeting but you couldn't remember what Themba Khosa said at that meeting. Do you remember now?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes I remember.

MR LAX: Now what I'm asking you is what was that meeting called for, why was that meeting called?

MR MKWANAZI: At that meeting Mr Khosa was addressing the people in Zulu and I am not that good in Zulu. Mr Mkhize addressed us on the issue of going to Boipatong.

MR LAX: So at that meeting on the 14th you now knew you were going to Boipatong but you didn't know when you would go to Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: We were told about an attack but when we were not told.

MR LAX: Yes, but you were told now where the attack was going to be?

MR MKWANAZI: Are you referring to the address by Mr Mkhize?

Mr Mkhize said we would attack and we must be ready but he did not tell us when.

MR LAX: We are talking about the meeting on the Sunday, not the meeting on the 10th. You said that on the meeting of the 10th Buthelezi told you about getting ready for an attack. We're now talking about the Sunday which is four days later.

MR MKWANAZI: That's not Buthelezi, it's Mkhize.

MR LAX: I didn't say anything about Buthelezi. I beg your pardon, I'm sorry, I mean Mkhize.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mkwanazi you told us that you were present at a meeting that was on a Sunday?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: You say at that meeting Mkhize talked about - is that the meeting at which Mkhize talked about the attack on Boipatong?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR LAX: So the point I was putting to you was on the Sunday you now knew that Boipatong was the place you were going to attack?

MR MKWANAZI: That is correct.

MR LAX: Because your previous evidence said to us that until the 17th you didn't know where, which place you were going to attack or when?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR LAX: Well just explain to us why you made a mistake?

MR MKWANAZI: Mr Mkhize addressed us and he told us that we should be ready for an attack because we were being killed as members of the IFP. He said we should be in a position to go and revenge in other words attack. He said we were being burned, we were being killed all the time. He said we should go into Boipatong and teach the people a lesson, a lesson that killing a person is not a child's play, we are also in a position to do the same.

MR LAX: And that was at the Sunday meeting?

MR MKWANAZI: Yes.

MR LAX: Just one last thing, Mr Mazibuko in his evidence says he saw Mr Mabote shooting with a small gun not an AK47. Are you sure it was an AK47?

MR MKWANAZI: I am sure he had an AK47 and a shotgun on that day, in his possession he had an AK47.

MR LAX: Thank you Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Anything arising from that?

RE-EXAMINATION BY MR STRYDOM: Thank you Chairperson.

The meeting of the 10th you testified about already, do you know what day of the week that was?

MR MKWANAZI: I do not remember.

MR STRYDOM: Now the meeting of the 10th when Mr Mkhize said that you must be ready for attack but he didn't give the dates or the place ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Strydom, is this going to take us any further? I mean the man's - his evidence is on record.

MR STRYDOM: I just want to establish if Mr Khosa was present at that meeting. The meeting of the 10th, was Mr Khosa there or not?

MR MKWANAZI: No.

MR STRYDOM: Thank you Chairperson.

MS PRETORIUS: Nothing further.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes thank you.

MR DA SILVA: I don't have any questions.

MS TANZER: None.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mapoma? Mr Malindi? Yes Mr Berger?

MR BERGER: No questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you Mr Mkwanazi you may stand down.

CHAIRPERSON: The time now Mr Strydom is about ten past 1, shall we start with your next witness at 2 when we resume?

MR STRYDOM: That will be convenient.

CHAIRPERSON: Could you indicate to us who will be the next witness?

MR STRYDOM: Moses Mthembu.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, thank you. We will rise, we will come back at 2 o'clock.

TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION

MR STRYDOM: Thank you Chairperson, the next applicant is Moses Mthembu and he appears as number 9 on the list.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mthembu, what language are you going to speak?

MR MTHEMBU: Zulu.

MANDLA MOSES MTHEMBU: (sworn states)

EXAMINATION BY MR STRYDOM: Thank you Chairperson.

Mr Mthembu, I want to show you your Form 1 application and I want to show you the last page thereof, page 153, is that your signature?

MR MTHEMBU: That's myself.

MR STRYDOM: I want to show you page 154 and 155, the annexure to your application. Has this document been explained to you?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: I'll get back to these documents because I first want to refer you to the request for further particulars and your answers to the request. The question I want to ask you here is has these questions and answers, are they correct as they appear in this document?

MR MTHEMBU: Would you please repeat?

MR STRYDOM: There's been a request for particulars and certain answers given. Now you've looked at the answers again, do you stand by the answers you gave?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: And then I want to show you your affidavit on page 162 ending on page 164, is that your signature?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: Now you had another look at this affidavit, you stand by the contents of that affidavit?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: Now the last paragraph or the second last paragraph of page 164 reads as follows:

Is that correct?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: You say in the last paragraph:

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: "On the basis that I associated myself...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Just a minute, which last paragraph were you referring to?

MR STRYDOM: On page 164.

CHAIRPERSON: Right.

MR STRYDOM: Page 164 Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Right, which last paragraph?

MR STRYDOM: Well the first one I started with was the penultimate paragraph and then I'm referring now to the last paragraph.

CHAIRPERSON: No, just before the last paragraph. The paragraph that you put to the witness, which one was that?

MR STRYDOM: That was the ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Is that the paragraph which begins with?

MR STRYDOM: "Hoewel ekself."

CHAIRPERSON: "Hoewel ekself nie betrokke was by die aanval nie"

MR STRYDOM: Yes, that's the one I started with.

CHAIRPERSON: And how did you interpret that to mean?

MR STRYDOM: "Although I was not involved myself during the attack" words to that effect, with the attack.

CHAIRPERSON: Right?

MR STRYDOM: "I do not approve of the massacre"

CHAIRPERSON: Yes. ...[indistinct]

MR STRYDOM: And there's a word missing there but then he states that "I have sympathy with all the family of the people, the deceased and injured people"

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, is there something that should have been before "had" there?

MR STRYDOM: Ja, unfortunately that's deleted.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay yes, I understand.

MR STRYDOM: Do you stand by the contents of that paragraph that's been translated to you now?

CHAIRPERSON: Yes I think he's just said that though.

MR LAX: Chairperson, I don't want to interrupt unnecessarily but I don't believe my learned friend's translation is correct. It says "Ek het simpatie met al die familie van die orleedenes en beseerders"

MR STRYDOM: Well I translated "I have sympathy with the family of the deceased and injured people."

MR LAX: Yes, no I'm not - I don't have a problem with that, I just don't see where there's the part where he says he doesn't approve.

MR STRYDOM: That appears just a sentence before that.

"Keur ek nie die menseslagting goed nie.

MR LAX: To "keur" something "goed" is to approve of?

Sorry it's my English - my Afrikaans is terrible.

CHAIRPERSON: I had a similar problem, I thought that the first part which ending up just before "keur" you know is the same sentence but I see that "keur ek nie" you know, yes very well.

MR STRYDOM: And I want to refer you now to the last paragraph:

Is that your application?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: If I can refer you now to the Form 1 and the annexure thereto. Just before I do that, as far as you are concerned you knew nothing about the attack is that what you say?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR STRYDOM: Just to make it clear did you know anything about the attack or not?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know who gave the orders for the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR STRYDOM: Your answer on page 153 in relation to question 11(b) which reads:

Will that be correct in the light of what you just told the Committee?

MR MTHEMBU: That is not correct.

MR STRYDOM: Now the annexure to the Form 1 sets out ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Wait a minute, wait a minute. He is saying that what the - what's contained in his further particulars is not correct, is that the position?

MR STRYDOM: No Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, you are saying that what's contained in your application is not correct? That is 11(b) right?

MR STRYDOM: Ja, the version of the applicant is spelt out in detail in his affidavit and it's contrary to what is stated in the application, the original Form 1 application.

CHAIRPERSON: I understand that fully. What I want him to do is to tell us how come that 11(b) contains incorrect information? Do you understand the question Mr Mthembu?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

CHAIRPERSON: In your application form for amnesty you stated in paragraph 11(b) that the order to attack was given by Bhekinkosi Mkhize and Xongo who is also known as Damara and you went on further to say this order was given on the 10th and the 17th June 1992. Do you understand that?

CHAIRPERSON: In your evidence you say that you did not know about the pending attack and you do not know who gave the order to attack?

MR MTHEMBU: I was only informed later after I was told by the attackers.

CHAIRPERSON: Now is the position that the information that's contained in paragraph 11(b) based on what you were told by the attackers?

MR MTHEMBU: Later, yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes Mr Strydom.

MR STRYDOM: Thank you Chairperson.

The annexure has also been explained to you, that is this document with - spelling out the political objective. Now in the light of your denial that you partook in the attack, you go along with that political objectives as set out in this document as been explained to you?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Now is the position this, prior to the attack on Boipatong you had no knowledge that Boipatong was going to be attacked?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

CHAIRPERSON: During the course of the week, that is prior to the attack, you never heard that there was a pending attack against - on Boipatong, although the date when such an attack was due to take place had not yet been determined?

MR MTHEMBU: I did not hear.

CHAIRPERSON: When was the first time that you heard about the attack on Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: I heard on the 18th June 1992, it was in the morning.

CHAIRPERSON: Were you at the hostel on the evening of 17th June 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you go to the stadium? You've heard that people were called to the stadium by means of ...[indistinct]

MR MTHEMBU: I did not.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you stay in your room?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay, prior to the attack on Boipatong were you ever consulted by Mr Mkhize or Damara to enquire as to what was to be done to the complaints by the residents of the hostel that they're being attacked?

MR MTHEMBU: Most of the time as paid leader I would get reports about people who were dying. I used to hear concerns such as the fact that they are dying but nothing was being done.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, were you ever consulted by any of the other leaders such as Xongo and Mkhize to discuss what was to be done about these complaints by the residents of the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: They did not come to me directly but yes, generally I used to hear that when we were at the arena.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay and you did not discuss with them at any stage that there should be an attack on Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay and you yourself did not go to Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay, you did not take part in the burning of the goods that had been stolen from Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

CHAIRPERSON: You did not associate yourself in any manner with the attack on Boipatong either before or after?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.

MR STRYDOM: During the period of the attack where were you working?

MR MTHEMBU: I was assigned to the housing officer position at Kwamadala.

MR STRYDOM: Do you work right in the hostel or did you go to another place to do your daily job?

MR MTHEMBU: I was dealing with the hostel only.

MR STRYDOM: Yes but the question is did you have an office in Kwamadala Hostel or did you go to another office?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Was the purpose - sorry Mr Strydom - was the purpose of applying for amnesty explained to you?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: What was explained to you?

MR MTHEMBU: Amnesty is granted to people who participated in the death of people in political violence. People who own up to their deeds.

CHAIRPERSON: You yourself did not take part in the killing in Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes and therefore there is nothing to admit before this Committee?

MR MTHEMBU: I am telling the truth, I did not participate, I was one person who was not trusted by the residents because I was always in touch with Iscor management.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, what I'm asking from you is there is nothing that you could admit before this Committee as having done in regard to the massacre in Boipatong because you didn't take part in that massacre?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct but I have a request.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes.

MR MTHEMBU: My first request is that I am grown up. People died even though IFP members who were residents at Kwamadala, such people died as well but the Boipatong incident is very difficult. It's very difficult always when people die on both sides of the line. Unfortunately the judge did not ask me, myself and my children and those that I know was sentenced, for example myself, I was sentenced to 18 years because of my ugly look. I am ugly by nature, the judge did not talk to me, he did not ask me any questions, he merely looked at me and decided that I should be sentenced. I'm therefore asking the Committee to have pity on me and to solve this problem. I am still alive today.

CHAIRPERSON: I understand what you've said. The only reason why I'm asking you these questions is so as to make sure that you understand fully what powers this Committee has. You've said it yourself that this - you are here - I beg your pardon, that amnesty is granted to persons who have committed political acts of violence and which they also admit having committed and you've told us that you yourself did not commit any act of violence in Boipatong, that's why I am asking you that if that is the case, what is it that this Committee - what is it that you want this Committee to do? We do not have the power to sit in judgement over the decision of the trial court. It is only the appeal court which can undo what the trial court did. Do you understand that?

MR MTHEMBU: Very well.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, we will nevertheless listen to your evidence but all I wanted to find out is what is it that you wanted us to grant you amnesty for?

MR MTHEMBU: Thank you very much Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you understand my explanation?

MR MTHEMBU: Very well.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes. Thank you Mr Strydom.

MR STRYDOM: During the trial you've been implicated by Mr Bajosi and Mr Malloy. Were they telling the truth or not?

MR MTHEMBU: That's a mistake.

MR STRYDOM: Now I was asking about your work. Just to get it clear again did you go out of the hostel to go and work?

MR MTHEMBU: I was always in the office.

MR STRYDOM: Who was the person in control of meetings in the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: There was a Committee, an IFP Committee, the chairperson of which was the deceased Tembikosi Khumalo and there was also this other youth committee which was led by Mr Qambelani who is also an applicant here, he was chairperson of that committee and because of people's ignorance, they used to refer to us as a committee. There were five of us, all of us employed and working at the hostel.

CHAIRPERSON: Would that be what was called the hostel management committee?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Is that what people also referred to as the steering committee?

MR MTHEMBU: There was no steering committee, because of peoples lack of English they would use all these sorts of words.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes but I know that Shoyisa for example was said to have been one of the members of the steering committee so in fact he was a member of the Hostel Management Committee?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: My next question is related to meetings. Was permission needed for each and every meeting to be held at the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct. I am the one who was responsible for issuing out permissions looking at the time during which the meeting would be held and I would issue out such a permit.

MR STRYDOM: Yes, did he keep record of meetings which was held?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Where did you keep these records?

MR MTHEMBU: I used to have a meetings book that used to cover or recall or should I say register all events of the day.

MR STRYDOM: Now was it possible that a meeting could be convened without your knowledge, convened and held without your knowledge?

MR MTHEMBU: That was not easy.

MR STRYDOM: Now the day of the attack was the 17th June 1992. As far as your knowledge goes was there a meeting on the Sunday before the Wednesday of the attack, that would be the 14th June 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: No I do not remember it that way.

MR STRYDOM: If Mr Themba Khosa would come to the hostel to address a meeting would you know about that?

MR MTHEMBU: I was supposed to know that.

MR STRYDOM: And as far as your knowledge goes was he there on the Sunday before the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: I did not see him.

MR STRYDOM: Some of the other applicants spoke and referred to a meeting that was held approximately one week before the attack and the date that was given was the 10th June 1992, are you aware of that meeting?

MR MTHEMBU: No I do not remember that meeting.

MR STRYDOM: Could that meeting have taken place without your knowledge whilst you were at your work or what?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is possible.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know a policeman by the name of Peens?

MR MTHEMBU: No I only saw him for the first time on Friday.

MR STRYDOM: And the other policeman, Greeff with his nickname Rooikop?

MR MTHEMBU: I don't know him as well.

MR STRYDOM: You obviously know Prince Vanana Zulu? Now do you know if he was at the hostel on the 17th June 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: I am sure he was not at the hostel.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know where he was?

MR MTHEMBU: He had informed me that he would be going home.

MR SIBANYONI: Excuse me Mr Strydom, may I just get clarity here, in view of the questions which were asked by the judge and the explanations, is this evidence leading in support of his application or maybe just to give his version of the events at the hostel?

MR STRYDOM: Yes the evidence is given in support of his application. I know the difficulties he will have with his application but also to give general evidence about what happened in the hostel which can be used for the other applicant's applications.

MR SIBANYONI: I take it at the end your argument will be to say you proceed with an application for amnesty in his respect?

MR STRYDOM: Yes I will do so, that will be legal argument but his evidence will stand and I will argue at the end of the case that his evidence should be accepted and if his evidence is accepted it can be used in support of some of the other applicants' evidence.

MR SIBANYONI: Thank you.

MR STRYDOM: You said that you are sure that Vanana Zulu was not at the hostel. How can you be so sure?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: Let me just repeat the question, you say you are sure. How come that you are so sure? Did you tell him anything, did you see him leave or what? How do you know he was not there?

MR MTHEMBU: He informed me that he will be going and he is my neighbour.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know when he returned to the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes he came back on the first Monday after the attack.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know a person who stayed at the hostel a certain time, Andries Matanzima Nosenga?

MR MTHEMBU: I think I remember him.

MR STRYDOM: Who was responsible to allocate rules in the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: It was myself and my committee.

MR STRYDOM: Do you remember allocating a room to Nosenga?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I remember.

MR STRYDOM: Do you know if it was before or after the attack on Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: It was after the attack.

MR STRYDOM: During that period, I'm again referring to June 1992, did you know Victor Kezwa?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Can I just ask you this? The committee that you're referring to, would that be the Hostel Management Committee?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you keep a record of who is allocated a room there at the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Do you know what happened to those records?

MR MTHEMBU: These records were confiscated by the police, to this day I don't know what happened to them.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, apart from those records that were kept by you and obviously by your Committee, were there ever any other records?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes we used to have a hostel report that was issued at least every Monday.

CHAIRPERSON: And where was this computer printout issued from?

MR MTHEMBU: This report used to come from the hostel manager.

CHAIRPERSON: And where was the hostel manager based?

MR MTHEMBU: He used to be based at the main building which was our head office.

CHAIRPERSON: Head office of Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: It was the main office of Iscor.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay so the hostel manager is the other person who would have records of who was staying at the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes thank you.

MR STRYDOM: The question - I don't know if I asked the question but I'll ask it again, during that period did you know Victor Kezwa?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Let me ask you this Mr Strydom, what is the significance of Kezwa?

MR STRYDOM: Chairperson there's been questions asked and certain statements put that Kezwa was also part of the attack on the day and I just want to find out from this applicant if he could say anything about it if Kezwa was in the hostel on that particular day or not.

CHAIRPERSON: Each and every witness is being asked about Kezwa. We all know that Kezwa is now deceased. Does anything really turn on Kezwa?

CHAIRPERSON: Chairperson it may point to credibility because Mr Masenga says that Kezwa was one of the people that took part in the attack and the other applicant says no and I've got now a witness here that can corroborate those applicants. But I will leave it at that, I think there's been lots of evidence about the fact that Kezwa was not there. I'll argue about that later on.

CHAIRPERSON: We've heard a great deal of evidence about Kezwa, they were saying he was in prison at the time. Yes but anyway if you want to put the question put it by all means but let us please get to the point.

MR STRYDOM: Thanks Chairman, so I'll just ask the question. On the 17th June 1992, during that period, did you see Victor Kezwa at the hostel or not?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR STRYDOM: In Mr Nosenga's statement it is stated here that Eugene Terre'blanche, or the AWB, came to the hostel to give the people food. Do you have any knowledge about that?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR STRYDOM: The day after the attack were you at the hostel or not?

MR MTHEMBU: I was at the hostel.

MR STRYDOM: Did you see Mr Themba Khosa after the attack, soon after the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR STRYDOM: When did you see him and where?

MR MTHEMBU: I still remember very well it was on the 19th on a Friday when we went to the police. It was myself and Humphrey Nglovu. Yes Themba Khosa was present as well.

MR LAX: Sorry, can you please repeat the one part of that answer, I didn't hear it very clearly, something interfered with the translation. Something about the police, just repeat that again please?

MR MTHEMBU: I still remember very well on the 19th myself, Humphrey Nglovu and Themba Khosa and Anina the attorney and the Ambassador V.V. Mvalasi, all of us went to the police.

MR STRYDOM: Do you have personal knowledge of anything, the loot, anything that came from Boipatong that was burnt afterwards?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR STRYDOM: Thank you Chairperson, I've got no further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes thank you. Advocate Pretorius?

MS PRETORIUS: No questions thank you.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DA SILVA: May it please you Mr Chairman ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Mr da Silva, you must bear in mind that this witness has as far as I recall, he has not said anything of and concerning the military.

MR DA SILVA: I'm quite aware of that, there are just two questions I have to the witness Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes.

MR DA SILVA: Mr Mthembu, you said that you were always in the office. Do I make the correct deduction that this office was at the Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: It was at the gate inside the hostel.

MR DA SILVA: And for the work that you did in that office did you receive a salary from Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: I have no further questions Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mthembu, can you recall who was the hostel manager as on the 17th June 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: Dries Steenkamp was the supervisor and the hostel manager was Swiss Basson. Swiss or Blatts Basson.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay, are you still employed by Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Do you know whether these two gentlemen are still with Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: Dries Steenkamp retired and Basson was suspended from work, I'm not sure whether he is back or not but he can be located any time.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, is it possible - do you know of your own knowledge whether the hostel records of 1992, particularly June ones are still available?

MR MTHEMBU: Chairperson these records must be kept.

CHAIRPERSON: At the moment do you know who would have custody of those documents?

MR MTHEMBU: I have no knowledge now but I think the Industrial Relations do have those records.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes thank you. Ms Tanzer?

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS TANZER: Thank you Mr Chairman.

Did you attend meetings when the siren was sounded?

MR MTHEMBU: Sometimes.

MS TANZER: So you are aware of the concerns of the hostel residents or their complaints?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MS TANZER: Now I assume, can you just clarify that Iscor assigned your position as Housing Officer?

MR MTHEMBU: Please may the question be repeated?

MS TANZER: Did Iscor assign you the position as Housing Officer?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MS TANZER: Were they aware of the fact or was it aware of the fact that many people residing at the hostel were not employed by Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes they knew that, I know that as well.

MS TANZER: Were you aware of all the dwellers and newcomers who would come to the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: I used to know them as they come so that I can allocate accommodation but some of them on leaving would simply disappear. Yes others would indicate that they were leaving. I did say that I kept a record.

MS TANZER: Could a person join the hostel without your permission and just find himself a room?

MR MTHEMBU: No not at all.

MS TANZER: On the night of the 17th June did you see the men leave the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: No I did not see them.

MS TANZER: But if they left with the main gate wasn't that next to your room?

MR MTHEMBU: Let me explain, I was doing the day shift but then the post assignment - I'm sorry I understand more Afrikaans than English but then the post assignment suggested that I should be available 24 hours.

MS TANZER: You say that you assigned a room to Nosenga after the attack. So when approximately did you allocate him this room, do you remember which month?

MR MTHEMBU: If I am not mistaken after the attack or the first two weeks of July in 1992.

MS TANZER: How many people would you say were staying at the hostel at the time of the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: There were many refugees and there were many Iscorians as well who exceeded 300 in number.

MS TANZER: And you could remember each one by name and face?

MR MTHEMBU: Some of them yes, some of them are so ugly you cannot look at them twice.

MS TANZER: So what is so distinguishing about Nosenga that makes you remember exactly when he came and when you allocated him a room in the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Nosenga hurt me very much, he was still young then. We heard about this Boipatong massacre, murdered, and he came to the hostel to say he had been sent to plant bombs inside the hostel having been sent by the ANC so that I am quite sure I can remember his face.

MS TANZER: When did he tell you this?

MR MTHEMBU: It was after I had introduced him to his peers, the youth.

MS TANZER: So when you introduced him, he admitted that he was planted by the ANC to plant bombs, is that what you are saying?

MR MTHEMBU: Unfortunately he was not asked but he was yes, going to admit.

MS TANZER: Well how did it come out that such a confession would be may or such an admission would be made?

MR MTHEMBU: Only men stay at the hostel, I think I know that when a young boy sees men he understands that he has come to a very tough place and there is a place that is governed by principle and rules, people were taken care of in terms of food, water to bathe, some of them were still young and they had fled leaving their families behind.

MS TANZER: But if he came, admitting that he came with an assignment from the ANC why did you not kick him out the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Usually we don't kill people. Sending a person away is wrong because it creates a problem between you and your creator.

MS TANZER: The man comes with full disclosure admitting to you his very reason why he's in the hostel and you accept him in the hostel without any problem. You say he hurt you in fact when he comes and he's open to you and he's honest, he's telling you his reasons for being there. Is that logical?

MR MTHEMBU: That is not acceptable but he too divulged the truth because he found ultimately a place where he could speak out so that we could make him strong.

MS TANZER: You knew the police were investigating the Boipatong attack at that time, why would you allow a man like Mr Nosenga to come to the hostel, who admits that he is working for the ANC to plant bombs, obviously searching for information about the attack, on your version, why would you allow such a man to stay in your hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: We realised that he was a refugee and we concluded that he would not be safe if he would go back to his handlers and tell the truth. We decided that we should keep him and keep him alive because had it not been otherwise he would not be here today.

MS TANZER: I put it to you that you are lying, you are protecting your co-applicants and perhaps other parties involved, that your answers regarding Mr Nosenga are nonsense and illogical and that Mr Nosenga's version of when he arrived at the hostel and his role at the hostel is the accurate and honest version that he will put and is putting to this Committee.

MR MTHEMBU: I would like to apologise very much, lady, I am not used to swearing and insults. I am not happy about being made a fool here because we are here to ask for amnesty.

MS TANZER: I have no further questions Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mapoma?

MR MAPOMA: Mr Chairman, I propose to ask questions after the ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Berger?

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR BERGER: Thank you Chairperson.

Mr Mthembu, would it be correct to say that the nature of your work required that you be present in the hostel 24 hours a day?

MR MTHEMBU: That was according to my duty, if I had to go to work I had to report and do whatever I'd left unfinished when I came back.

CHAIRPERSON: No I think what counsel is putting to you is this that the nature of your work required that you'd be on duty for 24 hours and in fact that's what you say?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: But the point is that you had to be in the hostel 24 hours a day, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: So everything that happened in the hostel you would be aware of?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: It's also correct is it not Mr Mthembu that you had been employed by Iscor since 1971?

MR MTHEMBU: That was on the 15th October yes, that is correct.

MR BERGER: And for how long had you been staying in the Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: From the 19th October 1990 to date even though yes, I was arrested and locked up for eight months.

MR BERGER: And the position which you had put you in a very special position with regard to Iscor management, in other words you knew a lot of what was going on at Iscor in relation to Kwamadala Hostel, would that be right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Now is it correct that you worked a lot with top management of Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: How many residents were there of Kwamadala Hostel in June of 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: If I am not mistaken Mr Berger there were not less than 300. I am talking about registered residents who had to pay for accommodation as employees of Iscor and we also had refugees apart from Iscor employees.

MR BERGER: At the criminal trial you gave evidence and at page 3601, in the middle of the page, you were asked the following question. I'm translating from the Afrikaans:

and your answer was:

Do you remember that figure?

MR MTHEMBU: Thank you for reminding me.

MR BERGER: Now that 410, would that be Iscor workers?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that's how it should be.

MR BERGER: And were they all men?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct, yes I did not or should I say Iscor did not employ women.

MR BERGER: So all the women who were staying in the hostel were lovers or wives of the men who worked at Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: Most of them yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Berger are you moving to another point?

MR BERGER: No Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: I just wanted to - are you busy on the figures?

MR BERGER: Yes I was going to go on but please?

CHAIRPERSON: When you gave evidence in the high court did you base this figure on the computer printout?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: And would the people that you described as refugees be also entered in the register or in the computer?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you keep a separate list of the refugees?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Do you have any independent recollection as to how many refugees were on the register?

MR MTHEMBU: No I cannot remember.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes. Yes thank you Mr Berger.

MR BERGER: Thank you Chairperson.

Mr Mthembu can you give an approximation of how many refugees were living at Kwamadala Hostel in June 1992? Are we talking about another 400 or less?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot remember how many there but there were many of them.

MR BERGER: And would it be correct to say they came from the townships of Sebokeng, Sharpeville and surrounding townships around Kwamadala?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And when you say many I assume there must have been hundred?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: So the hostel manager who had a record of residents in the hostel, would he have had a record of the refugees in the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: They were known because I used to attend caucus meetings and state this and I was ultimately given the right to use my common discretion because I too went to Kwamadala as a refugee, I was not a resident there.

CHAIRPERSON: No but I think what counsel is asking you is whether the hostel manager, would he have kept a record of refugees?

MR MTHEMBU: I am not quite sure.

MR BERGER: Mr Mthembu, you say in your further at page 161 in answer to question 11.4 and the question was:

and your answer was:

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: You confirm that answer?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Do you know that from 1990 the time when you came to the hostel all the way through to 1992, there were repeated attempts by various organisations in the Vaal including the Vaal Council of Churches to have Kwamadala Hostel close down because it was believed that Kwamadala Hostel was being used to harbour people who launched attacks on the residents of the Vaal. Do you know about that?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I know that.

MR BERGER: And you know that Iscor management said that they had no evidence that Kwamadala was being used as a haven for these people and they refused to close down the hostel.

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And you know for example that the residents of Boipatong presented memoranda for example to the police calling for Kwamadala Hostel to be closed down because it was perceived to be a place from which attacks on them were being launched?

MR MTHEMBU: I heard about that but people who were fleeing were ferried or transported by the police in police vehicles and they would take these people to the hostel and we would accept them. People as young as children and the aged were brought to the hostel by the police at some stage.

CHAIRPERSON: My recollection of the evidence is that most if not all of the people who stayed at the hostel came from somewhere in the township, the adjoining townships in the Vaal Triangle, is that right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: And that before it was occupied it had not been used and Kwamadala Hostel had not been used by Iscor before?

MR MTHEMBU: It was not in use yes.

CHAIRPERSON: So people who were running away from the adjoining townships and had been moved into the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Did Iscor management subsequent to that decide to formalise the accommodation of people at the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: They did not decide, we made a request because we did not want to lose our income. We said that even though the place was old but then there would be an employment opportunity for one.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes but of course Iscor acceded to that request?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Is that how the hostel management committee was set up?

MR MTHEMBU: Directly yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Now was it possible for a refugee for example to come and stay in the hostel without going through the formal procedure of approaching you and being allocated a room?

MR MTHEMBU: It was not easy.

CHAIRPERSON: But was it possible?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that would happen in my absence for example during the night shift if somebody was working at night he would gather the information and report back to me the following day and introduce the person to me at the same time.

CHAIRPERSON: But the report would only be made to you if people were prepared to make the report to you?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: If no report is made to you, you wouldn't know about the presence or otherwise of that person?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay so what I want to find out from you, is it possible that there were refugees who were at the hostel but who were not - whose names did not appear in your register?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes but there were very slim chances of such a thing happening.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, thank you.

MR BERGER: Thank you Chairperson.

Mr Mthembu, I take it from your evidence that Iscor top management were well aware of the fact that you were admitting refugees into the hostel and that they tolerated that situation?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And Iscor management were well aware of the fact that there were hundreds of unemployed men with no means of income resident at Kwamadala Hostel in June of 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: Let me clarify this Mr Berger, I am not running away from your question but I would like to explain that each one individual who came to the hostel would be asked a question at the gate as to what he wanted and whom he knew and he would have to give us the address and the details of the person he was looking for and he would go inside and bring that person back but if not we would make whatever means possible to bring the visitor and the visitor together.

CHAIRPERSON: But if you could then come back to the question. The question was, I can't recall whether it was put to you that was Iscor aware that there were hundreds of refugees who were staying at the hostel and who were not employed?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: They were aware of that?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: But while on this point I think the previous witness mentioned that, I think it was Mkwanazi, who mentioned that they used to receive food parcels from the Red Cross, is that the position?

MR MTHEMBU: They used to get these when we were still at the ...[indistinct] and at the time when we could not leave the hostel. I arranged with Iscor because I realised that it had become burdensome and Iscor decided that they contributed things like milk and mealie meal. Food parcels came from the Red Cross but before Iscor came in.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes. Again this was in response to your request, specific request, to Iscor that you are now unable to leave the hostel and therefore buy the necessary foodstuff for yourselves?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes. Yes Mr Berger?

MR BERGER: Thank you Chairperson.

If I understand your evidence as at the beginning of June 1992 Iscor management was aware of these hundreds of unemployed men living in Kwamadala?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: I want to read to you what you said at the criminal trial, I'm not contradicting you at this point, you were asked at page 3601. Now it's common cause that during June 1992 there were not only Iscor employed people living in the hostel but also a large total, large number of other people. You were asked the question:

These are the unemployed people and your answer was:

You said the "regeering" in Afrikaans

"...brought all these people and I accepted them."

And I'll read the Afrikaans just so that you can hear it because you say you understand Afrikaans, you said"

Can you just explain how was it that the Government was bringing people to Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: I am saying that the Government brought the people here, I have already referred to the Gubega Homestead and others who came with ulterior motives, using the same reason that they were being killed and burned and people would come and I would accept them.

MR BERGER: When you say the Government brought them, do you mean to say the police brought them?

MR MTHEMBU: That's right.

MR BERGER: So therefore it would be fair to say that in June of 1992 not only the Iscor top management but also the police in the Vaal were well aware of the fact that there were hundreds of unemployed men living in the Kwamadala Hostel alongside the 400 odd men employed by Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Now as far as the security of Kwamadala is concerned, is it correct that the area around Kwamadala was patrolled by the Vaal commander?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And is it also correct that the same area around Kwamadala Hostel was patrolled by Iscor security?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And Iscor security was in continuous - when they went out on patrol they were in continuous radio contact with a security control room at Iscor, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: There were also in continuous radio control with the security check points?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And these security check points included the gate control posts, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Now the gate control to the hostel, there was only one gate to the hostel, correct?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And that gate was staffed by employees of Iscor who fell under the housing department, in other words your department?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: At all relevant times is it correct there were three employees at the gate and those three employees were directly under your supervision?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Now the position of patrols that I spoke about are the Vaal Commando and Iscor Security, those were 24 hour patrols, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And on the evening of the 17th June 1992 who were the three men under your supervision at the main gate to the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: The night shift included Mr Besini Ntuli and these are the two men, it was a three shift based work, I cannot remember who was checking in at what time, they were relieved after eight hours. I think it was Simon Shoisa and Simon Mkwanazi.

MR BERGER: I take it there was a register of who was on gate duty at what time?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: And would the hostel manager have had control of that register?

MR MTHEMBU: We used to keep the register. I used to keep this register for daily report purposes so that I could write a correct or precise report.

MR BERGER: And where is that report today, that register today?

MR MTHEMBU: The long arm of the law confiscated it without informing me.

MR BERGER: Mr Ntuli, Shoisa, Mkwanazi, where are they today?

MR MTHEMBU: Mr Ntuli retired in 1996 and Simons are still alive but unemployed.

MR BERGER: Were they accused in the criminal trial?

MR MTHEMBU: Mr Ntuli testified, he came in only as a witness, he was not arrested.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you say because he was on shift on the day?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: Who did Mr Ntuli testify for, the State or the defence?

MR MTHEMBU: He was summoned by the attorneys of the arrested parties.

MR BERGER: So he gave evidence on your behalf at the trial?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Mr Shoisa and Mkwanazi never gave evidence at the trial?

MR MTHEMBU: I do not remember quite well but I think they did not deliver any testimony.

MR BERGER: Did you ever ask Mr Ntuli about what happened that night of the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I did.

MR BERGER: And what did he tell you?

MR MTHEMBU: He said he did not see anything.

MR BERGER: And did you ever ask him why he was not on duty at the gate as he was supposed to be?

MR MTHEMBU: He was not a man of mistakes, there is not a single thing in his response to me that indicated that he left the post for one minute to go to the toilet.

MR BERGER: You see because the reason I ask you this question is that - and I can't recall which of your co-applicants said this but it's been testified to by someone in the applicants that when they left to go attack Boipatong the guards at the gate had abandoned their positions and there were no guards at the main gate?

MR MTHEMBU: I have no knowledge in that regard.

MR BERGER: But you find it very strange, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you as I understood your evidence, Ntuli said he was at his post at the relevant time but he did not see anyone leaving the gate?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you perhaps ask him that "look here, Mr Ntuli, more than 400 people must have left through the gate, armed and must have returned through the gate at a later point, why didn't you say anything?" Did you ask him along those lines?

MR MTHEMBU: Chairperson, what confused me is that even though Mr Ntuli did not look at the time he was called by Iscor security, he came and knocked at the window where I was sleeping, in the room where I was sleeping, to say that I was wanted but by the post ...[indistinct] and he said on Frikkie Meyer Boulevard about 300 people were seen and feared that these people were coming to attack the Kwamadala Hostel residents and he wanted to know whether everybody was in the hostel. That is when I started to look at this, I walked around the houses around the gate and I discovered that nobody was suspected to have left the hostel and that on its own stopped me from continuing my questioning Mr Ntuli.

CHAIRPERSON: It would have been long after, that would have been long after the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: After hours of the attack.

MR BERGER: Thank you Chairperson.

Before we get to the attack, if you had been privy to the planning for the attack would you not have had a problem and this is the problem I want to put to you, you want to launch an attack on Boipatong, you want to get 400 or more armed residents out of Kwamadala and into Boipatong to slaughter the residents of Boipatong and you want to get them back into Kwamadala, would it not have been a problem for you taking into account the fact that the Vaal Commander, Iscor Security and the police were always patrolling in and around the area where your men would have to go through. I'm asking you, Mr Mthembu, as commander of those men would that have been a problem for you?

MR MTHEMBU: That would certainly have been a problem.

MR BERGER: Because you couldn't safely have led your men out of the hostel into Boipatong, spent an hour or so there and led your men back without being detected by (a) the police (b) Iscor Security or (c) the army or all of them, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct Mr Berger but I would like to add I am not disputing. Only on Wednesdays we have Iscor people working lesser hours. There were people who were off duty whilst others were working and they only worked for twelve hours on that day from 6 right up to sunset.

MR BERGER: So you're saying that Iscor Security might not have been patrolling?

MR MTHEMBU: For example people were watching the situation and they knew very well how the Iscor Security operated, they knew that nobody was going to work that time and nobody was coming from work. It occurs to me that they may have used that opportunity. There was no one from 7 o'clock in the evening right after 11 o'clock. There was no one who would come back from work. There was dead silence.

CHAIRPERSON: That would have been between 7 in the evening and?

MR MTHEMBU: Eleven - evening.

CHAIRPERSON: Between 11 and 7?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: Is it between 7 p.m.?

MR MTHEMBU: 7 p.m.

CHAIRPERSON: And 11 p.m.?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: No one would be coming to the hostel between that time? Only people returning?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: What time did the last shift finish in the evening?

MR MTHEMBU: The last shift would come in at 6 in the evening by which time another group would be going and others who were working overtime.

CHAIRPERSON: So people would be leaving the hostel round about what, 5, 4, to go to start the 6 o'clock shift?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: And another group would be leaving the hostel round about 4,5,6 in the morning?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: I see.

MR BERGER: So you're saying from 7 in the evening until 11 in the evening there was no Iscor Security patrol in the area around Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: That's how it seems.

MR BERGER: Only on Wednesdays?

MR MTHEMBU: On Wednesdays, on Saturdays and on Sundays, the system is the same.

MR BERGER: But as far as the police and the Vaal Commander were concerned their patrols 24 hours around the hostel were seven days a week?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: So as commander of this attack force you still would have had a problem, taking your men out of the hostel and into Boipatong because there was always the danger that you could come across a police vehicle or a military vehicle, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: Would you please repeat the question?

MR BERGER: There was always the danger that leading such a large group of armed men out of the hostel you could encounter a vehicle from the Vaal Commando on patrol or you could encounter a police vehicle in that area around the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes but I can tell you that if they had planned in advance to walk behind the vehicle to have an opportunity to sneak, that yes was possible, they knew the area very well.

MR BERGER: And you're saying that the gate to the hostel which is very close to the entrance to Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Did not have Iscor Security personnel in close proximity on a Wednesday evening?

MR MTHEMBU: I would not say they were not at their posts but knowing how the Iscor shifts operated they would ...[intervention]

MR BERGER: They would what?

MR MTHEMBU: I am saying for example that if a pig eats the mother doesn't count how many times it eats.

MR BERGER: You've lost me but never mind.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mthembu, would you please explain what you mean by ...[indistinct]

MR MTHEMBU: I am saying it was easy because you have only one person. They were looking at the Iscor Security and the Vaal Commando only and if these two groups had gone past, the people from the hostel knew that nobody else would come on foot to disturb them at the time of the day.

CHAIRPERSON: The hostel residents, they must have been - were they aware of the routine followed by the Vaal Commando and the Iscor Security in patrolling the area?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes they knew because it had been a long time, for a very long time. If somebody was watchful enough that was possible.

MR BERGER: The reason I ask you these questions is because I have a document here which I don't intend making an exhibit and burdening the Committee with, but I can tell you it was a memorandum submitted to the Goldstone Commission on behalf of Iscor and it talks about an Iscor patrol on the evening of the 17th June 1992. Do you know a certain Mr Nel?

MR MTHEMBU: Maybe I can recognise him should I come across him.

MR BERGER: Mr F J Nel, a senior control officer.

MR MTHEMBU: Yes, thank you, now I remember seeing or listening to the initials. He is now working here at the Iscor Club, he retired.

MR BERGER: He began a patrol at 10 minutes past 8 in the evening and according to this memorandum his patrol passed the Kwamadala Hostel between ...[intervention]

MR MTHEMBU: May the question please be repeated?

CHAIRPERSON: At what time is the question Mr Interpreter?

INTERPRETER: May the question please be repeated pertaining to the patrol?

MR BERGER: At 10 minutes past 8 in the evening he left the South Gate, he patrolled the outside boundary fence, during his patrol he passed the Kwamadala Hostel and he concluded his patrol and 20 minutes past 8, so the time would be between 10 past 8 and 20 past 8 in the evening.

MR MTHEMBU: That is like him.

MR BERGER: At 5 to 9, do you know a Mrs Oosthuizen? She was a control room security officer?

CHAIRPERSON: Wait a minute, wait a minute. Just repeat your answer?

MR MTHEMBU: I will not dispute that, he is telling you what he was doing.

MR BERGER: At 5 minutes to 9 that evening Mrs Oosthuizen, she's a control room security officer, she received a telephonic report from Mr S De Bruto, he was on duty at the North-Eastern Gate, that a radio report had been received by him from a Mr J Maleisi. Mr Maleisi was on duty at the North Gate and Mr Maleisi said that a group of plus minus 800 people were moving in the direction of the East gate. Can that be correct?

MR MTHEMBU: I would not deny that.

MR BERGER: Now who is Mr Maleisi?

MR STRYDOM: Chairperson, I object with respect to these questions, I don't see where it's taking us. This witness testified that he was not there, he did not partake in the massacre, he did not walk with the people. Now I can't see why these questions should be posed to this witness and what's the relevance thereof?

MR BERGER: Chairperson, I'm asking a question about a particular person who was on duty at a particular gate and with respect to my learned friend he led Mr Mthembu for two purposes, (a) to give evidence in support of his own application and (b) to give evidence in support of the application of all the other applicants. With respect I submit I'm entitled to question Mr Mthembu on matters which might have a bearing on the applications?

CHAIRPERSON: The issue is not so much what Mr Strydom did, the question is whether what you're asking, is it relevant to the issue of things, that's what you should address us on.

MR BERGER: Indeed I will Chairperson.

The size of the group, the question about whether Iscor was aware, whether there were people on duty at the gate, whether Mr Mthembu can be believed when he says he doesn't know there was an attack going out past his room are issues relevant to this application. Yet Mr Mthembu's credibility as a witness is going to be relied upon by the applicants at the end of this case and ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: How do they rely upon a person who says he was not there, he was not aware of the attack, he did not do anything that is wrong for which he is applying for amnesty.

MR BERGER: Chairperson, his credibility is going to be relied upon as a credible witness to support the applicants. My learned ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Well let me make it clear that this is not an open ended enquiry, the enquiry must be confined to the issues that are relevant before this Committee. The first issue is whether there has been full disclosure and whether the acts for which people are applying for amnesty are acts committed with a political motive. I have been very patient so far but I think it is about time that counsel should confine their cross-examination to the issues that are relevant. I will allow the question.

MR BERGER: Mr Mthembu, I'll try and go very quickly. Do you know Mr Maleisi?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot remember him.

MR BERGER: Where is the North Gate in relation to the Kwamadala main gate?

MR MTHEMBU: As far as I'm concerned I think North Gate is about four or more kilometres from Madala.

MR BERGER: And the East Gate is just outside the entrance to Kwamadala Hostel, is that right?

MR MTHEMBU: It is inside.

MR BERGER: Inside the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Inside the firm, the hostel is outside.

MR BERGER: So if people were moving in the direction of the East Gate would they be leaving Kwamadala or entering Kwamadala?

MR LAX: Sorry Mr Berger, how could they be entering or leaving Kwamadala if they were approaching the East Gate, he said the East Gate was outside Kwamadala, it was outside and Kwamadala was outside of the property.

MR BERGER: The East Gate is on the Iscor premises.

MR LAX: Your original question wasn't ever answered and that was is the East Gate adjacent to Kwamadala?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is the nearest gate.

MR LAX: So all I'm asking is if 800 people were moving in the direction of the East Gate, is it possible to say whether they were moving towards Kwamadala or away from Kwamadala?

MR MTHEMBU: East Gate is behind Kwamadala, a person who is moving from Kwamadala cannot see East Gate.

MR BERGER: Alright. Mr Nel immediately proceeded to the East Gate and he patrolled along the eastern boundary. Now according to him he found nothing there and he proceeded to the Kwamadala main gate where he found Mr Steyn and Mr Schneider from Iscor together with you?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: And you were asked at that point whether all the residents were present in the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: You said yes.

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: Now this must have been after the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: I heard that that took place after the attack.

MR BERGER: Before that you were in your room near the main gate?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR BERGER: Where were you?

MR MTHEMBU: I was in my bedroom, my house number was 0, then from 1 when you go past room 19 with a very big toilet that is inside the building, it's quite a distance. If I'm not mistaken I think this is the side double to the sides of the hall, a distance from my house to that gate, to that main gate of Kwamadala Hostel.

CHAIRPERSON: It's approximately, what, 75 metres?

MR SIBANYONI: If we accept that that's 30 times 2 that's 60 plus 50.

MR MTHEMBU: Mr Chairperson, if I'm not mistaken, it is not less than 800 metres from my house to the main entrance of the Kwamadala Hostel.

MR BERGER: You must have been very far from the main gate then?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: About 25 times the length of this room?

CHAIRPERSON: He said perhaps 2 times and a half.

MR BERGER: And then he said 800 metres?

CHAIRPERSON: Sorry, we're just putting distance over the ...[indistinct]. It is your evidence that it is not less than 800 metres?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that's what I said.

MR BERGER: At the criminal trial you said that if a siren had been sounded you would have known it?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And if an attack had been launched on Boipatong you would have known it?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: Was that evidence the truth?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes it is still true.

MR BERGER: So then the evidence from your co-applicants that a siren was sounded must be a lie because you never heard a siren.

MR MTHEMBU: The siren was supposed to be standard but it looks like the people were running away from me because they knew that I was going to tell Iscor though I was not at work on duty at the time, I would tell them that something was happening. So if there was such a number of people and buildings like that, from the position that I was maybe the siren could have started somewhere else, far away from where I was. Excuse me Mr Berger, this Kwamadala Hostel had residents of about a thousand and something. The beds and the houses that were in there were about 144. This building was big and if this building was in a ...[indistinct] to the other buildings inside the building itself that would make me not to hear the siren. I am not running away from the truth, I would not say that there was no siren but if perhaps if it was sounded at a place where I was far away from I did not have a friend at the time, everything that was happening there would happen but the people would know very well that there was this person who had been troubled if the people do not tell the truth.

MR BERGER: Mr Mthembu, you evidence which you confirmed as correct was if a siren had been sounded "I would have heard it" meaning "I never heard it" so therefore no siren was sounded. That was your evidence which you say is still the truth?

MR MTHEMBU: All I'm saying is this, I did not hear the siren because it was sounded as usual, I would hear it, even the meeting itself was not planned, don't forget that, two things took place at the same time, everything was not planned according to the rules. According to the rules siren would be sounded after the people had been given permission to convene a meeting, that meeting was not planned the residents of Kwamadala did not plan the meeting but the siren itself is something that is sounded whenever necessary, please understand me on that point.

CHAIRPERSON: Is the fact of the matter this, you do not dispute from what you're saying now that the siren could have gone off without you hearing it?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is true Chairperson.

MR BERGER: Did you say this is true today?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: How is it possible that every other resident of the hostel heard the siren except for you?

CHAIRPERSON: Well is that the evidence Mr Berger that everyone else in the hostel heard the siren excepting for this witness?

MR BERGER: The evidence is that every resident of the hostel was called to the stadium.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, it is one thing to call the residents to the hostel, it is one thing for them to hear the siren.

MR BERGER: I'll rephrase the question.

CHAIRPERSON: You see, what's been put to you is this, your co-applicants who have given evidence so far, all of them, tell us they heard the...[indistinct] and as a result of that they went down to the stadium. Now why is it that you are - you didn't hear?

MR MTHEMBU: This is the situation Chairperson, today they are telling the truth, some things that they know very well to me because all the things that they were doing they were doing it on their own, I was in the dark, I did not get information. If I was told that or even if this whole thing was planned I would have that knowledge. Even now I'm still telling the truth, this is the only truth that I'm telling today.

MR BERGER: Were there people living near to you amongst the accused of the criminal trial?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR BERGER: Let me ask you this, you said at the criminal trial that if there had been an attack on Boipatong you would have known about it?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: Are you now saying that that evidence is not correct?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I'm still saying that.

MR BERGER: But there was an attack on Boipatong and you claim to have no knowledge of it?

MR MTHEMBU: The evidence that there was an attack at Boipatong, I heard that on the 18th in the morning that 37 died. I agree with that but no one told me at that time. As I was not present it's difficult for me, Mr Berger, to know things that took place during my absence. That is why I'm still telling the truth that I was not at Boipatong. Perhaps I wouldn't disagree if I was told as a resident but I was regarded as a person who was safeguarding the firm and if the people were trying to do something maybe they would regard me as a person who would disturb that process.

CHAIRPERSON: That's not the question Mr Mthembu, I'll gather that what's been put to you is what you said in the trial and that is if there had been an attack at Boipatong you would have known about that, do you understand the question?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: What counsel wants to find out from you is that evidence true?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is true.

CHAIRPERSON: We all know and we've already heard that there was an attack at Boipatong. We heard your evidence that you were not present during the attack. What is being put to you is this, as you are giving evidence in court, you told the court that if there was an attack at Boipatong you would have known about it. Do you get the question?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: What is your response?

MR MTHEMBU: My response is this, I was not told, I was left behind. As today the residents of Kwamadala Hostel had come back, they did not reveal that information to me and that shows that whatever they intended to had broken their hearts and now they know that they're not innocent.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mthembu, just listen to the question. You've repeatedly told us that they kept you in the dark about the attack on Boipatong is that right?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: That is why prior to going to Boipatong to attack they didn't tell you.

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: You only became aware for the first time on the 18th the day after the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: The fact of the matter is that there was an attack in Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I know now.

CHAIRPERSON: Which took place under your nose?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: And which you were not aware of prior to it's taking place?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: I don't want pursue further with the matter I think the record speaks for itself. I don't know whether you want to pursue this point?

MR BERGER: No I won't. I won't Chairperson.

Not only as I understand your evidence, not only were you not aware before the attack that there was going to be an attack on Boipatong but you say that before the attack you had no idea whatsoever, no knowledge whatsoever that there was even going to be an attack on anyone in any community of the Vaal, am I right? You had no idea?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: I want to ask you about some of the answers that you gave in the further particulars. If I understand your evidence correctly the way I read it, as far as the political structures of the IFP and the hostel were concerned, the chief politician in the hostel was Prince Vanana Zulu, am I correct?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: Everyone in the hostel who was a member of the IFP was politically answerable to Prince Vanana Zulu, the supreme political head in the hostel.

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And he in turn was answerable only to leaders of the IFP beyond the hostel, am I correct?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: So if Mtwana Zulu gave an order, a political order, such as there should be no attack on Boipatong, that order was binding on all IFP members in the hostel and - sorry?

MR MTHEMBU: Correct.

MR BERGER: And no one else in the hostel had authority to disobey that order, is that correct?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct but he knew that we were not at IFP region, we were at the premises of Iscor.

MR BERGER: Yes, but there were very specific IFP structures within the hostel and all IFP members were answerable to those IFP structures, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And if the supreme leader of the IFP in the hostel Mtwana Zulu says there shall be no attack on Boipatong until I come back from leave then no one had the authority to go over his head and launch an attack, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: Now on the day after the attack who told you there had been attack on Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: One of the women that I don't her name, she phoned me in the morning of the 18th because I had to call early at work because I was woken up during the night and I was told about the 37 people who were killed at Boipatong. There was a large number of people who came to attack the Kwamadala Hostel. She refused to tell me her name.

MR BERGER: Was this early in the morning?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: When did you discover that the residents of Kwamadala had been the attackers?

MR MTHEMBU: I heard from that morning, I suspected because as Paul Schneider woken me up the people who came in like Mr Khanyile and the others who were coming in the usual way but they did not want me to easily notice that they had done something. I started suspecting from then.

MR BERGER: And by the 18th you knew that the Kwamadala residents were responsible for the attack?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And when you gave evidence in the criminal trial you said that the Kwamadala residents were not responsible for the attack, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: Because if they had been responsible for the attack you would have known?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: So you deliberately misled the trial court on that point am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR BERGER: You misled the trial court to protect your co-accused, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR BERGER: Or what would you call it if not misleading the trial court?

MR MTHEMBU: I gave the court all I knew even today I still maintain that. The attackers who are the people who said something else it was dark, I did not know what was happening. Remember Mr Berger that I was among the people who were in the hit list, people who were to be killed. I think there was information that leaked, some information that leaked in that process.

MR BERGER: Did you tell the trial court that by the 18th June 1992 you were aware that the Kwamadala residents had attacked Boipatong?

MR MTHEMBU: At that time I did not have knowledge but I later got to know and as I'm looking at the facts now it appears and after hearing Mr Khanyile's evidence, he was one of the people who got through the gate on the 17th on the night. I could not point a finger at him.

MR BERGER: Let's go to the 18th June. You say that Themba Khosa came on the 19th not the 18th?

MR MTHEMBU: I said so, I said what I can still remember well and what we did with Mr Themba Khosa it was on the 19th, I know very well what he did on that particular day. I do not dispute the fact that he was not there on the 18th, everything was still new to me. They were asking everything, they were asking me some questions, I cannot dispute that fact.

MR BERGER: Could it be that you are mistaken and let me tell you why. Mr Mkwanazi for example gave evidence just before you and he confirmed that Mr Themba Khosa was present on the 18th with Humphrey Nglovo. Mr Themba Khosa himself on a radio interview last week confirmed that within hours of the news of the attack on the 18th he was at Kwamadala Hostel on the 18th.

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I agree that I have made a mistake if that's the case.

MR BERGER: Now on the 18th when Themba Khosa came, Humphrey Nglovo came, you say that Ms Anina van der Westhuizen was also there?

MR MTHEMBU: That is why I can talk about the 18th, I beg your pardon on the 19th, I can make a mistake about the 18th. Let us not talk about the dates, the 18th, but I remember very well on the 19th, I remember very well what happened on the 19th.

MR BERGER: Were you not at the meeting on the 18th when Themba Khosa was there?

MR MTHEMBU: No I can't remember.

MR BERGER: At that meeting where Themba Khosa was and Humphrey Nglovo, you say that you never heard Themba Khosa say that all the goods must be burned, all the evidence must be burned?

MR MTHEMBU: I said that as I've already told that I apologise for what happened on the 18th.

MR BERGER: No, no, you don't have to apologise.

CHAIRPERSON: Are you saying that you cannot recall what took place on the 18th?

MR BERGER: No I cannot remember what took place on the 18th.

CHAIRPERSON: You see because the evidence has been that another meeting was called, all the men went to the stadium, this is now the day after the attack, you don't remember that?

MR BERGER: I remember but all the things that happened on the 18th were new on my mind.

CHAIRPERSON: Were you on duty on the 18th June?

MR BERGER: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: At the gate?

MR BERGER: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you go to the stadium when the meeting was called?

MR BERGER: I went there it was in the morning, I went there to address but there was not a stadium, it's just an arena.

CHAIRPERSON: And you were present in the arena with hundreds of men when Themba Khosa addressed them or Humphrey Nglovo?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I was once there, only once. Not only once more than once.

MR BERGER: And during that meeting somebody, let me put it just at that for the time being, somebody gave an order that all the loot from Boipatong must be burnt? Do you remember that?

MR MTHEMBU: No I cannot recall but I've heard that if I was there I would remember.

MR BERGER: No you were there because in your further particulars, question 5.1, you say they came with Attorney Anina van der Westhuizen, that's Themba Khosa and Humphrey Nglovo? One of them, I can't remember which one of the two said that we must co-operate with the police?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I agree Mr Berger.

CHAIRPERSON: I think what he says, he didn't hear, is the part dealing with the burning of the loot.

MR STRYDOM: Chairperson also that answer does not necessarily - sorry.

CHAIRPERSON: Is that right Mr Mthembu?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR STRYDOM: Question 5 reads as follows:

It does not - they said it points to the 18th, could also be the 19th the witness has been referring to.

CHAIRPERSON: But I think Mr Berger is aware of the fact that what this witness has been repeatedly saying is that he is sure about the 19th but he is not sure about the 18th but in any event I think the point has been cleared, yes.

MR BERGER: Yes I am aware of that but Mr Mthembu, what you're saying is if Themba Khosa says he was there on the 18th, you're not going to dispute that?

CHAIRPERSON: No, I won't dispute that.

MR BERGER: If Mr Mkwanazi says that he attended a meeting on the 18th at the stadium or the arena where Themba Khosa was present and Humphrey Nglovo was present, you're not going to dispute that?

MR MTHEMBU: No I won't dispute that.

MR BERGER: During the course of that day round about midday or the early hours of the afternoon, we know that all the loot from Boipatong was burnt, all the evidence that linked the attackers to Boipatong was burnt and destroyed. You don't dispute that, am I right?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot dispute that.

MR BERGER: And are you saying that at the time you were not aware at all of the fact that there was this burning going on?

MR MTHEMBU: I did not have knowledge.

MR BERGER: When was the first time that you heard that evidence from Boipatong had been burnt?

MR MTHEMBU: I heard that for the first time here in this TRC hearing.

MR BERGER: You never heard about it during the criminal trial?

MR MTHEMBU: No, I did not hear anything.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you say you were isolated?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I'm saying that.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you say you were isolated?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I said I was isolated.

MR BERGER: I'm sorry Mr Mthembu, are you saying you never heard the evidence given during the trial?

MR MTHEMBU: That testimony was never given, I did not hear them testifying to that effect. The other gentleman did not tell the truth there in court that here they've already indicated that they are telling the truth.

MR BERGER: It is correct is it not that you were present in court throughout the criminal trial?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I was present.

MR BERGER: And you heard the evidence given in court throughout the criminal trial?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mthembu, forgetting for one moment about what your co-applicants said at the trial, namely that they denied that they were guilty, was there evidence that some of the items that had been stolen from Boipatong were you know, were burnt? In court?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I heard that evidence in court.

MR BERGER: Didn't you just tell the Committee that the first time you heard evidence about goods being burnt was during these hearings?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I said so. The witnesses in court, that's what they said but here, even themselves, they made such utterances.

MR BERGER: Mr Ntuli was on duty at the gate to the Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: At the criminal trial page 3624 you were asked:

INTERPRETER: Can the speaker please repeat the first point?

MR BERGER: Okay. I summarise it.

in other words, the East Gate which is different from the main gate to the Kwamadala Hostel and it is different from the Iscor patrols, the East Gate itself was manned on a 24 hour basis and your answer"

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is still true.

MR BERGER: And how far was that post from the main gate of Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: I think it was a full kilometre from East Gate to main gate of Kwamadala Hostel.

MR BERGER: Are you certain about that because I've been to the East Gate and it certainly does not look like a kilometre from the main gate?

MR MTHEMBU: I am certain about that because there is a curve. If you are facing the gates standing on the road you can see though you are not yet at the gate, you can see.

MR BERGER: If I show you Exhibit M1 which is a photograph would you be able to point out the main gate to the hostel and East Gate and if you could also point out where you room was?

I'll hand you my copy of M1. Can you first mark the main gate with an A?

MR MTHEMBU: ...[no translation]

MR BERGER: And then could you mark the East Gate with a B?

And then could you mark your room with a C? Thank you Mr Mthembu.

MR STRYDOM: The witness hasn't marked the main gate of the hostel, that must be marked with an A.

MR BERGER: Please.

MR STRYDOM: Main gate entrance.

MR MTHEMBU: I am not very clever as far as this subject is concerned but I have tried my best.

MR BERGER: Thank you Mr Mthembu. ...[inaudible] the marks, if I can just make them clearer for everybody.

CHAIRPERSON: Are these marked A,B,C?

MR BERGER: Ja but it's unclear, I'll try to make it clearer.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay, if you'll just indicate what A stands for, B and C, are they marked?

MR STRYDOM: A was the East Gate.

MR LAX: A was the main gate.

MR BERGER: A was the main gate, B is the East Gate and C is Mr Mthembu's room. Your attorney has a green highlighter, perhaps that would help?

MR STRYDOM: Just next to - it points to the circle, the circle is actually the point where A should be.

MR BERGER: You say in your statement at 163 that on the night of the incident I was awoken by Paul Schneider from Iscor Security. Did he come into the hostel to your room to wake you up?

MR MTHEMBU: No, someone, a person who was at the gate he was sent down.

MR BERGER: So you then went to the gate and you met Paul Schneider?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: And he said to you that there's a group of people on Frikkie Meyer Boulevard who are apparently coming to attack Kwamadala Hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: Now this is sometime between 10.30 and 11 o'clock at night, is that right?

MR MTHEMBU: I did not check the time but I did not dispute that.

MR BERGER: The reason that I put that time is because I'm looking at an affidavit deposed to by Theunis Steyn employed by Iscor Security, it's Exhibit L13 and L14 and he gives a time of 10.30 when he was in the radio room and then he says that he and Paul Schneider moved to the Kwamadala Hostel where he spoke to a certain Moses, a leader of the Inkatha members and he asked him, this is Mr Steyn, he says:

Now he must be referring to you?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes he was referring to me.

MR BERGER: And then he says we then went to the East Gate of Iscor and he puts a time there at 10 minutes past eleven. So his conversation with you must have been some time between 10.30 and 10 past 11 at night?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I agree because I did speak to him.

MR BERGER: And at that point he says to you there's a large - well this is Schneider - who says to you there's a large group of people who are apparently about to attack Kwamadala Hostel.

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And at that time the conversation is going on at the main gate at the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: So that if we know those weren't people coming to attack the hostel, they were attackers returning to the hostel, correct?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: So if they had returned to the hostel through the main gate, you would have seen them there and then?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: You say I did not go and look, so you didn't go and look to see this group coming into the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: But you were at the gate?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And the people never came in through the main gate?

MR MTHEMBU: Some came in through the main gate, that was later.

MR BERGER: How many came through the main gate?

MR MTHEMBU: Though I cannot remember the number, I think there are more than ten. They were coming in groups. They were with Vincent Khanyile who was one of us or who is one of us.

MR BERGER: And none of them had any evidence of having been on an attack, none of them had weapons or bloodied clothes or loot or did they?

MR MTHEMBU: Some had assegais but I cannot remember seeing the firearms but they were wearing coats.

MR BERGER: And the hundreds of other attackers? They never came through the main gate?

MR MTHEMBU: It might happen that they used the main gate but I am not certain whether they all used the main gate because

Paul Schneider had woken me up and he told me to stay there and he said they were going to investigate.

MR LAX: Sorry, did I hear correctly that Paul Schneider told you to stay at the main gate while he went to investigate?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR LAX: Thank you.

MR BERGER: Did you ask Vincent Khanyile where he had been? Why was he coming back to the hostel at such a late time?

MR MTHEMBU: No I did not ask him.

MR BERGER: Why not?

MR MTHEMBU: I was only - there was a person who was sitting there but I was only there to tell about what I had seen.

MR BERGER: Didn't you say to Vincent Khanyile "have you heard there's a whole group of people coming to attack us?"

CHAIRPERSON: Did you speak to Vincent?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I did speak to him.

MR BERGER: What did you say to him?

MR MTHEMBU: I told him that the security of Iscor said a group of about 200 to 300 people was seen, they seemed like people who were coming to attack the Kwamadala Hostel but they were still going to investigate that.

MR BERGER: And you weren't concerned at all about this group of 200 to 300 people coming to attack Kwamadala Hostel because you went back to sleep? Is that what happened?

MR MTHEMBU: I opened the nearest rooms because from the main gate the residents had occupied the block downward from my side. No one was staying there from my side except Mdwana or Vanana Zulu who was not present at the time. I asked them because I wanted to go back to the gate again and as I was told to stay there I had to go back there and stay there.

MR BERGER: No Mr Mthembu, you've just been told by Iscor Security that there are two to three hundred people coming to attack the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: You don't go and look to see what's happening?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR BERGER: You are told by Iscor Security to remain at the gate.

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: So with an attack on the hostel imminent you go to sleep?

MR MTHEMBU: I did not go back and sleep, I waited because people had tune radios, they could communicate with the others because our hostel was the property of Iscor and it was surrounded by two fences, it was not just in the open space.

MR BERGER: What about the main gate, were you not afraid that these attackers might come through the main gate and attack you sleeping in the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: No I was not scared of that because I was already told to wait there because these people were armed, the Iscor Security were armed.

MR BERGER: Was the Iscor Security waiting at the main gate to protect you in case of an attack?

MR MTHEMBU: No they had gone, they first communicated through the tune radio.

MR BERGER: Do you confirm what you say in your statement, the people did not come to the gate?

"I again went to sleep and later I was awakened by people

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I confirm that Paul Schneider came to relieve me and he said he was looking for a light because these people were lying on the grass because it looked like on the road towards Vanderbijlpark there was a place and it looked like these people were lying there, lying flat on the ground, that they're only there facing the gate that was next to Iscor. The person who would only attack, there was a person who knew the place very well and it's a person who would open the hole there and I went back to sleep and Vaal Commando came to awaken me.

MR BERGER: Yes but who came from the Vaal Commando to wake you up?

MR MTHEMBU: They stood at the gate and they sent Mr Ntuli, I don't know that person, it's the person that was not known to me.

MR BERGER: And you were called to the gate again, you went to the gate and you spoke to this soldier from the Vaal Commando?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And this person told you again or also told you that there people who were gathering at the robots?

MR MTHEMBU: No he did not say that to me, he said towards the road there's grass there, not at the robots, at the lawn.

MR BERGER: Let me read to you what you say in your statement:

MR MTHEMBU: No that is not what happened.

MR BERGER: Alright, the people from the Vaal Commando told you that those people out there who were coming to attack Kwamadala were still there?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes they said they were going to get a lamp that they would shoot in the air so that they can see the people who were there.

MR BERGER: And you were so concerned about this potential attack on Kwamadala that you went to sleep again?

Bottom of page 163.

MR MTHEMBU: I was given an instruction that this matter was in the hands of the Iscor Security and Vaal Commando. They know that we were going to die like cockroaches, we were going to die, we wouldn't let them attack them but what we used to do, we were told not to do but inside we were told to sit down and I wouldn't wake the people up, I had to go back and sleep though I was not sleeping in my room.

MR BERGER: Isn't it Mr Mthembu you knew they were not coming to attack Kwamadala, you knew they were hostel residents coming back to Kwamadala, that's why you went to sleep, that's why you weren't concerned? In other words you didn't fear any attack because you knew there was no attack?

MR MTHEMBU: I was scared but as a security guard I was told to work with them.

MR BERGER: You say that if Themba Khosa had come on Sunday the 14th June you would have known?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I was supposed to know. Yes I agree that I was supposed to know that.

MR BERGER: Because there wasn't a meeting that took place in the hostel that you weren't aware of?

MR MTHEMBU: I've already told you Mr Berger that each and every meeting I would be the one who would authorise such meetings, even if the reason for the meeting was something else or otherwise. On that particular time I would know that the arena would be occupied by people attending a meeting.

MR BERGER: But you don't know about a meeting two weeks before the attack on the 3rd June, do you?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot remember.

CHAIRPERSON: Sorry Mr Berger. Is the position that meetings within the halls had to be authorised by you?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

CHAIRPERSON: So if there is any meeting that's going to take place you should have been told?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: But you don't recall any meeting on the 3rd June 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot remember Mr Berger because what would appear it would be easy for them to communicate through their protocol and they would come to the office. It's not each and everyone who would request of ask for permission for a meeting. It would be IFP meeting or Youth Brigade. They would tell or they knew what members were allowed to go and ask for permission to convene a meeting, not just anyone.

MR BERGER: You see if you were being sidelined as you say you were then there could have been a meeting on the 3rd and the 10th and the 14th and the 17th, all of which you were not aware of? Isn't that right?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR BERGER: Did you say that Vanana Zulu was your neighbour at the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And his room was near the gate, wasn't it?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: You're still working at Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: Have you made any attempt to locate the hostel records or the registers or any documentation which might cast light on the position in June 1992?

MR MTHEMBU: Unfortunately I did not check because the registers would mention that he was still employed by the Iscor.

MR BERGER: Mr Mthembu you say you haven't tried to get any registers?

MR MTHEMBU: I tried.

MR BERGER: The last time you saw your registers, they were in the possession of the police, is that right?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot recall if I did see them, they took them during my absence because they were at the gate at the time, I don't know when were they taken away but I later realised that the registers were no longer there.

MR BERGER: Do you remember giving evidence at the criminal trial about three police colonels who had taken your registers?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I remember, there's a short one, I cannot remember his surname, he once mentioned this.

MR BERGER: Was that Davidson?

MR MTHEMBU: There is another one but I cannot remember but I think it was Grove or Groove, something like that.

MR BERGER: I beg your pardon, let me read to you the evidence that you gave at the criminal trial and I'm sure it will refresh your memory.

CHAIRPERSON: Is it not possible just to put what this witness said at the trial which of course is not concerning us today so as to shorten these proceedings?

MR BERGER: Yes Chairperson.

Do you know a Colonel Greeff?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I remember him.

MR BERGER: And Davidson?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot remember him but there were three of them.

MR BERGER: And then there was a short one who liked to speak Zulu?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR BERGER: And his name was Du Pont?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: The Greeff that you referred to, was that not the man who was here on Friday?

MR MTHEMBU: No it was, no he doesn't look like him in appearance, he doesn't look like him.

CHAIRPERSON: Well did you say that he was - he appeared somebody older, the one who appeared before us?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR BERGER: Chairperson I have no further questions. Thank you Mr Mthembu.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Malindi?

MR MALINDI: I have no questions, Chairperson.

MS CAMBANIS: No questions.

MR MAPOMA: Thank you Chair, no questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Any re-examination Mr Strydom?

MR STRYDOM: No re-examination.

MS PRETORIUS: No re-examination.

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DA SILVA: May it please you Mr Chairman?

Mr Mthembu, a question was put to you by my learned friend Mr Berger, where it was put to you that there was an area around Kwamadala was patrolled by the Vaal Commando?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR DA SILVA: Now were you aware that there might be military vehicles in the vicinity of Kwamadala which did not belong to the Vaal Commando?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR DA SILVA: How would you differentiate between vehicles which belonged to the Vaal Commando and other military units?

MR MTHEMBU: The Vaal Commando people were different as far as I'm concerned.

MR DA SILVA: Different in which respects?

MR MTHEMBU: They had different vehicles that were smaller, sometimes they would use that type of a vehicle. The commando would not speak to people they would do whatever without saying anything to the people.

MR DA SILVA: Now if you had to - your co-applicants spoke of suitcases. If you had a suitcase from a Vaal Commando and say from Lenz Military Unit, how would you know the difference between these vehicles?

MR MTHEMBU: As it was mentioned you would see them even if they were inside the vehicle.

MR DA SILVA: I don't understand that Mr Mthembu, you were there, please explain to the Committee how you would know the difference between a vehicle from the Vaal Commando and for instance the Lenz Military Unit?

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mthembu, these commandos and these security, these military officers, did they use different motor vehicles?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Tell us what was the difference or are you not able to tell us?

MR MTHEMBU: The car that was used by the Vaal Commando was a van, smaller with seats inside, it was smaller. The other would not talk to people, they would just come with their big vehicle with dark uniform and they would just go back to wherever, they wouldn't discuss anything with us.

MR DA SILVA: The vans that you are describing is that what is normally known as a riot bakkie? A yellow Toyota van with perspex around the back, is that what you're talking about?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR DA SILVA: Now are you saying that the Vaal Commando did not use these riot bakkies?

MR MTHEMBU: That's what I used to see that most of the time we would talk like workers of Iscor of different departments but these with suitcases they would not discuss anything with us.

MR DA SILVA: Now what I want to know from you, is the Vaal Commando, you've answered several questions in regard to the Vaal Commando, did they use suitcases and did they use riot bakkies or what did they use?

MR MTHEMBU: I have mentioned that what it looks like. I'm going to say what Mr da Silva wants because I've already mentioned that their cars were different.

ADV SIGODI: Sorry Mr da Silva. Do you know who was responsible or where the suitcases came from or which unit they belonged to?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR DA SILVA: I'll try and shorten the proceedings Mr Mthembu, if you had a suitcase, a brown suitcase standing in front of you, my instructions are that Lenz Military Unit and Vaal Commando both used suitcases. I want to know from you how would you differentiate them?

MR MTHEMBU: Mr da Silva, I'm here to apply for amnesty, I talk about something that I know. I'll not mention anything about something that I don't know because you want me to differentiate things that you have combined yourself.

MR DA SILVA: Mr Mthembu, isn't it that you can't tell the difference and if you saw a brown vehicle that looked like a suitcase you'd make the assumption it belonged to the Vaal Commando, isn't that the point?

MR MTHEMBU: No I do not know the difference but I've already mentioned that we used to discuss with the others there was nothing knew and we would discuss with the others but there was this other group that we wouldn't discuss anything but that was not a problem to me.

CHAIRPERSON: You see I think what counsel is trying to put to you or find out from you is this, can you tell from a distance whether that motor vehicle is a Vaal Commando motor vehicle or whether it is a motor vehicle used by the military? We know from your evidence that the other group used to come to you and you would talk to them, do you understand that?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: But I think the question is are you in a position to make that distinction from a distance without having to talk to the people. Do you understand the question?

MR MTHEMBU: No I'm not in a position to tell.

MR DA SILVA: Are you in a position to say which route the Vaal Commando patrolled?

MR MTHEMBU: No I cannot tell because the day you would see it you would only see the vehicle only at the gate, you wouldn't see where it was coming from. You wouldn't know whether it has taken the Boulevard or coming from right inside the Iscor, so I cannot tell the difference.

MR DA SILVA: Now you gave testimony in regard to Exhibit M1, the plan, can you please look at that again?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR DA SILVA: Now you drew point B which is the East Gate right at the bottom of the page? Is that correct?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR DA SILVA: Now isn't point B the East Gate, isn't it actually off the photograph, it doesn't appear on the photograph, isn't that why you drew it at the bottom of the page?

MR MTHEMBU: Mr da Silva I told you that I don't know much about the map, I'm not very good in describing the map.

MR DA SILVA: What you're saying is you took a guess, you assumed point B was there and that's where you put it down and you might be incorrect?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR DA SILVA: Now in regard to the plan will you ...[intervention]

CHAIRPERSON: Just hold on a minute, are you saying that you made a mistake?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I've made a mistake.

MR DA SILVA: Now if you look at that same Exhibit, the plan, look on the extreme left hand side, you'll see there's an A and a B, do you see the B on the left hand side?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MR DA SILVA: Now if you see the point that B indicates, according to the schedule annexed to this Exhibit, that is the main gate, would you agree with that? The main gate to Kwamadala?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I agree.

MR DA SILVA: So the point that you've indicated on that plan is A being the main gate is not the same point as B?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR DA SILVA: Now in regard to the people that visited you or spoke to you at the gate after the attack, I understood your evidence to be in the early cross-examination by Mr Berger, that you spoke to Mr Paul Schneider hours after the attack, that was what you testified, is that your recollection? Are you able to give an estimate of how long after the attack you spoke to Mr Schneider?

CHAIRPERSON: Do you know when the attack took place?

MR MTHEMBU: No I do not know.

MR DA SILVA: Are you able to estimate at all when you spoke to Mr Schneider what time it was?

MR MTHEMBU: I did mention that I had a watch Mr da Silva but when I was woken up I did not check the time.

MR DA SILVA: So you're not able to say what time you spoke to Mr Schneider?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR DA SILVA: How long after you spoke to Mr Schneider did you speak to the member of the Vaal Commando?

MR MTHEMBU: It was after a long time. I think it was more than an hour.

MR DA SILVA: Now you were asked a question what was the conversation that took between yourself and this person from the Vaal Commando and you started explaining about grass on the road. Could you explain what was the conversation that took place between yourself and this member from the Vaal Commando?

MR MTHEMBU: Those were the instructions that came through Iscor Security that there were people who were seen crossing the road, Frikkie Meyer Boulevard, who were attackers who were coming to Kwamadala Hostel and then I was given a message, I was instructed to sit there and stay there and I was waiting for him to come and tell me what would happen thereafter and after that he told us not to move there, they said everything was in their hands and they knew that there was only one entrance from Kwamadala Hostel. There were other cars that he pointed that were next to the railway line because one of the Iscor bakkies was there already. He mentioned also that they were looking for a lamp because it looked like these people were there lying on the lawn and they wanted to get a lamp so that they could easily see those people.

MR DA SILVA: So are you saying that the member of the Vaal Commando told you that he was looking for a lamp because he suspected the people were hiding in the grass, is that what your answer is?

MR MTHEMBU: That is what I was told.

MR DA SILVA: Now the person that you spoke to who you assumed to be a member of the Vaal Commando, how was he dressed?

MR MTHEMBU: I cannot describe, my mind was not stable, my mind was thinking fast at the time.

MR DA SILVA: Are you not able to describe this man's clothes at all? Was he wearing shorts, was he wearing a t-shirt? What was he wearing?

MR MTHEMBU: It was winter and it was cold, I did not see this t-shirt, I apologise for the fact that I cannot describe his clothing because I was shocked at the time because I was told to stay there because the attackers were coming.

MR DA SILVA: So you can't even describe the colour of this man's clothes, is that correct?

CHAIRPERSON: Mr da Silva, he has repeatedly told us he is not in a position to tell us what clothing. Let's move on please.

MR DA SILVA: As the Chairman pleases.

You can't describe whether this person is an officer or a non-commissioned officer can you?

MR MTHEMBU: I did not notice his rank, I do not know.

MR DA SILVA: Isn't it possible that you spoke to somebody else but not a member of the Vaal Commando?

MR MTHEMBU: Unfortunately, all I'm saying is what I heard, he told me that he was working for the Vaal Commando. I am not saying things out of my mind.

MR DA SILVA: My instructions are that there were members of the Vaal Commando after the attack at the Kwamadala main gate but that they spoke to nobody and there was nobody in sight. Do you have any comment in that regard?

MR MTHEMBU: Will you please repeat your question?

MR DA SILVA: I'm saying to you that my instructions are that after the attack there were members of the Vaal Commando at the Kwamadala main gate, there was nobody in sight and they spoke to nobody so I'm saying to you that you're mistaken, you did not speak to a member of the Vaal Commando?

CHAIRPERSON: Or when the person said to him he was from the Commando he was not telling the truth?

Did you understand the question?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: What's your answer?

MR MTHEMBU: My answer is what Mr da Silva is saying is not true.

CHAIRPERSON: And you're basing that on what this person told you, that you spoke to?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes that is correct.

MR DA SILVA: I have no further questions Mr Chairman.

FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MS TANZER: Just two questions Mr Chairman.

Can you clarify that no record of the refugees who were living at the hostel were ever presented to Iscor, was that your evidence that we heard in cross-examination.

CHAIRPERSON: He did not say that, he said he showed them the register.

MS TANZER: As I understood it Mr Chairman the record of the refugees were not shown.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you keep a register of the refugees?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Did you make that register available to Iscor?

MR MTHEMBU: I used to have it all the time if I'm going to the meetings.

CHAIRPERSON: But did you make it available to them?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes.

MS TANZER: So in effect they would have these records today?

MR MTHEMBU: I'm not sure as to their procedure but I did my work, I did my job.

MS TANZER: Now also the amount of refugees you said they - or people, they were living in the hostel by June 1992. You mentioned in examination it was about 300 then in cross-examination it went to an excess of 1000?

CHAIRPERSON: No, those were the sum total of people who resided at the hostel.

The 1000 that you've mentioned was it the refugees only?

MR MTHEMBU: All the people who were residing at Kwamadala Hostel, that was a number of all the people.

MS TANZER: And after the attack on Boipatong was there no instructions by Iscor to clamp down on the refugees that you allowed to live in the hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: They requested many times that all the people who were not working for the Iscor should vacate and get another place to stay because Iscor was communicating with the government that Iscor should have their own burden and the government should take care of it's own burden.

MS TANZER: No further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Sibonyoni?

MR SIBANYONI: Thank you Mr Chairperson.

Mr Mthembu at what stage or during which year did you start keeping record of the people staying at Kwamadala Hostel, I'm asking you that question because according to Khanyile's testimony, people just invaded the hostel without any permission. Do you understand my question?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I understand your question sir. I started working as a housing officer in 1991 and I started working like that, that is why Mr Khanyile has his own view because there's a lot of us, there's office secretary and the men responsible for the gates and the other person and myself.

MR SIBANYONI: Now you said Nosenga told you that he was sent by the ANC to plant bombs in the hostel. Did he just say that or did you in fact see those bombs?

MR MTHEMBU: I did not see the bombs. Nosenga as a person who was speaking Sotho and looked hungry. There were lots of things that you would notice in him, I sent him to a group with people who were more like him, the youth and the people who would stay there with him and they would discuss. I did not have time to look after the refugees, I had a job as a housing officer as I was earning my salary.

MR SIBANYONI: Last question, you said the police used to bring people there and ask that you should accommodate them. Were there such many people who were brought there?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes there were a lot of people who would be brought by the police but most of them, more that those that were brought by police, those were the people who would just come and say the police referred them to Kwamadala Hostel because they did not have accommodation.

MR SIBANYONI: Thank you Mr Chairperson, I have no further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Advocate Sigodi?

ADV SIGODI: No questions Chairperson.

MR LAX: Thank you Chairperson.

Mr Mthembu there were just two small aspects. The first relates to the security and the shifts and so on. I was just wanting to understand the relationship between when shifts started and where the people were patrolling and so on. Was the purpose of the security so that people could be accompanied on their return from work and not be attacked or - do I understand it correctly?

MR MTHEMBU: No.

MR LAX: What was the purpose then, just general security?

MR MTHEMBU: The Iscor Security, as our hostel was a property of Iscor and the route from Iscor would go past our hostel just to see to inspect the place. If there something going wrong they would contact the relevant people not that they were doing something beyond that but it was just suggestions like people who were working for the same company.

MR LAX: Okay so the issue of shifts and so on that was just the shifts that the security personnel worked, had nothing to do with the rest of the other workers?

MR MTHEMBU: The shift of Iscorians, the employees of Iscor.

MR LAX: I'm still no closer to understanding but it's not that important. The second aspect was I understood you to be saying when Mr Berger was asking you about attending meetings at the arena, that you went there to address them in one of those meetings, is that right?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes on the 18th in the morning when I got a message, when I got a telephonic message that 37 people had died in Boipatong so there was a group of people who would be coming to attack at Kwamadala, that was one of the meetings that I addressed as far as I'm concerned.

MR LAX: So you called a meeting on the morning of the 18th?

MR MTHEMBU: That is correct.

MR LAX: Did you have the siren run that morning to call the meeting.

MR MTHEMBU: The speaker was in my hand on that particular day.

MR LAX: And what did you tell the people who came to the meeting?

MR MTHEMBU: I told them if I'm not mistaken I think as they were coming in, as there were about 15, I told them that I received a call saying that Boipatong area was attacked, 37 people had died and the residents from Boipatong were all over the place and they were at a meeting, they held a meeting at the stadium and they came and they intend to come to Kwamadala Hostel to attack. I asked the person who was giving me that message, she refused to tell me but I could still detect that the tone was a lady's voice.

MR LAX: So there were only fifteen people at that meeting?

MR MTHEMBU: Yes I can say so if I'm estimating.

MR LAX: Okay and what did you decide to do about this threat to your hostel?

MR MTHEMBU: I wanted them to tell one another because we couldn't get all the people at the meeting because it was still early in the morning and it was cold and I was on my way to the office, I was in a hurry to get to the office and do my job.

MR LAX: So you weren't concerned about the threat at all, you just told a few people and you went off to do your job?

MR MTHEMBU: I was shocked even the night before, I was scared and I couldn't stay with people who have already heard that an attack was imminent. I also went to fetch my assegai, I still have that assegai, even today.

MR LAX: Now the last question related to when you spoke to Khaneyile at the gate, when you saw him coming in, you said some of those people were armed with their spears?

MR MTHEMBU: There were not many people, it was just a group of young men but you could see the spears underneath though they were coming in groups you wouldn't see clearly because they were wearing coats.

MR LAX: Well didn't that strike you as odd, here they are, coming back late at night with spears under their coats?

MR MTHEMBU: I have said Mr Lax that I was scared, I was shocked, I was shocked because I was woken up by Iscor Security during the night because it became clear that whatever was taking place was beyond the person who was at the gate, it was beyond that person's control. That was happening for the very first time for the Iscor Security to come and wake me up in my room.

MR LAX: Thank you Mr Mthembu.

CHAIRPERSON: Is there anything arising?

MS PRETORIUS: No.

MR STRYDOM: No further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you.

MR DA SILVA: Mr Chairperson, may I be permitted just one question?

CHAIRPERSON: Arising from?

MR DA SILVA: From Mr Lax's question please Mr Chairman.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes.

FURTHER CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR DA SILVA:

Mr Mthembu you said that when the people returned they were wearing big coats

and you saw them carrying spears. Did you see anybody carrying a microwave oven or T.V.s or videos or anything like that coming through the gate?

MR MTHEMBU: Unfortunately I did not see that.

MR DA SILVA: I have no further questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Mr Mapoma?

MR MAPOMA: No questions.

CHAIRPERSON: Malindi?

MR MALINDI: No questions.

MS CAMBANIS: None thank you Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Mthembu, thank you, you may stand down.

MR MTHEMBU: Thank you.

CHAIRPERSON: Because we are about to rise would you mind just sitting down until we rise?

Mr Strydom, who is your next witness?

MR STRYDOM: Richard Dlamini.

CHAIRPERSON: Richard Dlamini, very well.

MR BERGER: Chairperson through you, could I ask my learned friend if we could just have a few more names of Mr Dlamini in the order in which he intends to call them, if he can?

MR STRYDOM: Chairperson there are only a few left so I think Richard Dlamini then Paulos Mbatha and then Petrus Mdiniso.

CHAIRPERSON: There is still this outstanding matter relating to the other applicant, is that Gubega I think it is? What is the position regard to Mr Gubega.

MR STRYDOM: Chairperson, I had a discussion with my learned friend Mr Berger.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes?

MR STRYDOM: And he said if he is on the same footing as the others he won't pursue his objection.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes I'm aware of that.

MR STRYDOM: And that's the discussion, I showed him certain documents, the documents have been faxed through to Cape Town and he was prime facie happy with those so he can give an indication if he still wants to oppose his application or not.

MR BERGER: Chairperson, the only point I said to Mr Strydom was there was talk about an earlier application, if that falls away then you've already then made a ruling, we can't take it any further than that.

CHAIRPERSON: Yes, were your enquiries in regard to whether or not he had made an earlier application together with the other fifteen?

MR BERGER: No apparently he made an application on his own.

CHAIRPERSON: On his own, okay and all you were waiting for was to be shown that application?

MR BERGER: Yes.

CHAIRPERSON: Have you been shown his application?

MR BERGER: I don't know what the status is of that earlier application.

CHAIRPERSON: Mr Chairman, the situation is that his application was made together with all the other applicants. When a fax was sent from my instructing attorney's office with 36 pages, including that 36 pages, the application of Kubeka. The other application we're talking about is the one we can't find so I'm not relying on that application, the application I'm relying upon is the one that was sent like all the other applicants applications.

CHAIRPERSON: The original applications.

MR STRYDOM: The original applications.

CHAIRPERSON: Well that's what Mr Berger is looking for isn't it?

MR BERGER: No Chairperson, that's that half baked application.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay.

MR BERGER: And I don't take that any further.

CHAIRPERSON: Which was subsequently supplemented, is that what you're saying? Just like the rest of the other - or just like some of the applicants did.

MR STRYDOM: Yes that's indeed so, very late in the day but it was supplemented.

CHAIRPERSON: Okay now where is that?

MR STRYDOM: That's the documents I handed up on the previous occasion, Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: So is there an issue still?

MR BERGER: No Chairperson.

CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Very well we will start - there was a suggestion that we start at 9 o'clock and I decided that we - we decided that we should start at half past 9. We will go back to that 9 o'clock. I take it that that offer still stands? We will rise now, we will reconvene tomorrow morning at 9 o'clock.